• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Spike Lee rails against Gentrification: "We been here. You just cant come and bogart"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Spike Lee basically went on a tirade against wealthier, new arrivals of disrespecting the culture of pre-dominantly black areas. He also asks questions about facilities suddenly being better in per-dominantly black areas after the influx of white arrivals. I recommend listening to all his answer here

Here's the full transcript (I recommend listening to the audio because it has the Spike Lee flair which can't be felt from reading the text.):
[Audience member: You mentioned gentrification with some slightly negative connotations and I wondered if you'd ever looked at it from the other side? Which is that, if your family was still in that $40,000 home that's now worth $3.5m to $4m…]

Lee: Let me, let me, let me, let me just kill you right now.

[OK, go for it.]

There was a bullshit article in the New York Times saying the good of gentrification. I don't believe that.

Here's the thing: I grew up here in Fort Greene. I grew up here in New York. It's changed. And why does it take an influx of white New Yorkers in the south Bronx, in Harlem, in Bed Stuy, in Crown Heights for the facilities to get better? The garbage wasn't picked up every motherfuckin' day when I was living in 165 Washington Park. P.S 20 was not good. P.S 11. Rothschild 294. The police weren't around. When you see white mothers pushing their babies in strollers, three o'clock in the morning on 125th Street, that must tell you something.

[And I don't dispute that … ]

Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. And even more. Let me kill you some more.

[Can I talk about something?]

Not yet.

Then comes the motherfuckin' Christopher Columbus Syndrome. You can't discover this! We been here. You just can't come and bogart. There were brothers playing motherfuckin' African drums in Mount Morris Park for 40 years and now they can't do it anymore because the new inhabitants said the drums are loud. My father's a great jazz musician. He bought a house in nineteen-motherfuckin'-sixty-eight, and the motherfuckin' people moved in last year and called the cops on my father. He's not — he doesn't even play electric bass! It's acoustic! We bought the motherfuckin' house in nineteen-sixty-motherfuckin'-eight and now you call the cops? In 2013? Get the fuck outta here!

Nah. You can't do that. You can't just come in the neighborhood and start bogarting and say, like you're motherfuckin' Columbus and kill off the Native Americans. Or what they do in Brazil, what they did to the indigenous people. You have to come with respect. There's a code. There's people.

You can't just – here's another thing: When Michael Jackson died they wanted to have a party for him in motherfuckin' Fort Greene Park and all of a sudden the white people in Fort Greene said, "Wait a minute! We can't have black people having a party for Michael Jackson to celebrate his life. Who's coming to the neighborhood? They're gonna leave lots of garbage." Garbage? Have you seen Fort Greene Park in the morning? It's like the motherfuckin' Westminster Dog Show. There's 20,000 dogs running around. Whoa. So we had to move it to Prospect Park!

I mean, they just move in the neighborhood. You just can't come in the neighborhood. I'm for democracy and letting everybody live but you gotta have some respect. You can't just come in when people have a culture that's been laid down for generations and you come in and now shit gotta change because you're here? Get the fuck outta here. Can't do that!

And then! [to audience member] Whoa whoa whoa. And then! So you're talking about the people's property change? But what about the people who are renting? They can't afford it anymore! You can't afford it. People want live in Fort Greene. People wanna live in Clinton Hill. The Lower East Side, they move to Williamsburg, they can't even afford fuckin', motherfuckin' Williamsburg now because of motherfuckin' hipsters. What do they call Bushwick now? What's the word? [Audience: East Williamsburg]

That's another thing: Motherfuckin'… These real estate motherfuckers are changing names! Stuyvestant Heights? 110th to 125th, there's another name for Harlem. What is it? What? What is it? No, no, not Morningside Heights. There's a new one. [Audience: SpaHa] What the fuck is that? How you changin' names?

And we had the crystal ball, motherfuckin' Do the Right Thing with John Savage's character, when he rolled his bike over Buggin' Out's sneaker. I wrote that script in 1988. He was the first one. How you walking around Brooklyn with a Larry Bird jersey on? You can't do that. Not in Bed Stuy.

So, look, you might say, "Well, there's more police protection. The public schools are better." Why are the public schools better? First of all, everybody can't afford — even if you have money it's still hard to get your kids into private school. Everybody wants to go to Saint Ann's — you can't get into Saint Ann's. You can't get into Friends. What's the other one? In Brooklyn Heights. Packer. If you can't get your child into there … It's crazy. There's a business now where people — you pay — people don't even have kids yet and they're taking this course about how to get your kid into private school. I'm not lying! So if you can't get your kid into private school and you're white here, and you can't afford it, what's the next best thing? All right, now we're gonna go to public schools.

So, why did it take this great influx of white people to get the schools better? Why's there more police protection in Bed Stuy and Harlem now? Why's the garbage getting picked up more regularly? We been here!

All right, go ahead. Let's see you come back to that.

[I agree with every single thing you said.]

Nah, nah, nah, nah.

[I let you talk, now let me talk. My one sole point though is wealth creation in the African-American community, something that we've traditionally been locked out – you bought a house in the ghetto and in three generations the house was worth nothing in the ghetto. So, for those homeowners that did stick in in Bed Stuy – my parents moved in it was an all Jewish neighbourhood there, so I've seen it through everything – so for those people that did stick in, now we have an opportunity for wealth creation that we've been locked out of. So now while it may not help the renters, and everything you said was absolutely true, what about that one aspect of wealth creation for people that have paid those taxes, that have fought to keep the crime down on their blocks, and all the other things they did to maintain… because the white folks are not moving back because it's the ghetto, they're moving back because they are beautiful blocks full of beautiful brownstones that have been well maintained by people of colour.]

Yes, but here's a thing to deflate your answer. The people you talked about are not a great number. Number one, a lot of these people have not kept their taxes so they can't afford to keep the house. Number two, when these real estate guys come around and open a suitcase with a bunch of money they're gonna sell it. I mean these people you're talking about are elderly. And they get the money, their money goes a lot further down south. Black people by droves in New York City, it's called reverse migration. They're moving to Atlanta, they're moving to North Carolina. They got a house, they got a lawn, they got a backyard, they have less taxes… New York City's a hard place and so if you've worked all your life and you're retired, they're selling their houses and I don't blame them. I can't say to them, 'you can't sell your house'. They're like, 'Fuck you, Spike'.

You have to do some research, and look at the numbers. The black American population of New York City is going down. There's reverse migration.

What we have is that… and it's something that De Blasio's gonna… I mean he can't get the snow off the streets, but still… what we need, we need affordable housing for everybody. People can't afford, I mean, here's the thing… the further away from Manhattan. Brooklyn Heights is the most expensive neighbourhood. Then you got Park Slopes, Fort Greene, Cobble Hill, Clinton Hill and then, you know, it works like this… the rents get cheaper the further away you go from Brooklyn. And the reality is, after the sand on Coney Island, it's the motherfucking Atlantic ocean.

So, where you gonna go? Where you gonna go? Puerto Ricans say the same thing. A lot of people said 'well, we're gonna move to Bucks County. Or move back to Puerto Rico'. People can't afford to live here anymore. And if people can't afford to live then it's going to be the [words unclear] like you. There used to be a time you could… when $2 and $1, you could get by. You can't do it anymore. So, if New York City is not affordable then the great art that we have is not going to be here, because people can't afford it.

So, I know what you're saying, but I don't see a lot of good coming from gentrification for the people living in those neighbourhoods. We got a new neighbourhood in the South Bronx now, what do we call it? What? SoBro. It's a scam! It's shenanigans, trickery, people being bamboozled, leather string, run a-muck. What they call Bushwick now?

[East Williamsburg. And it starts around Rochester now, it's crossed Brooklyn.]
 

Yaboosh

Super Sleuth
Gentrification is tricky as hell. I mean, what can you do? It can suck something major, but how can you stop it? When an area becomes trendy, and this can happen for all sorts of reasons, people with money will move there and businesses will follow.
 
Gentrification is tricky as hell. I mean, what can you do? It can suck something major, but how can you stop it? When an area becomes trendy, and this can happen for all sorts of reasons, people will move there and businesses will follow.

I approve of this post.
 

water_wendi

Water is not wet!
Spike Lee can change my mind about anything. i thought gentrification was pretty bullshit but hearing his explanation of it i think it might not be so bad after all.
 
Racism is alive and kicking in this country



The first black president had to show his birth certificate to the country to prove to amurricans that he wasn't born in some African jungle in Kenya. Think about that embarrassing fact for a second.
 
Gentrification is tricky as hell. I mean, what can you do? It can suck something major, but how can you stop it? When an area becomes trendy, and this can happen for all sorts of reasons, people with money will move there and businesses will follow.
One of the reasons Spike Lee pointed out is hipsters:
The Lower East Side, they move to Williamsburg, they can't even afford fuckin', motherfuckin' Williamsburg now because of motherfuckin' hipsters. What do they call Bushwick now? What's the word? [Audience: East Williamsburg]
 

CLEEK

Member
I can understand opposition to gentrification for financial reasons. Inflating house prices, so the local population can no long afford to buy or rent there. Low wage workers forced to live further out, increasing commute time and travel costs. But if a suburb is in a prime location, close to business centres, this is inevitable.

What I don't understand is when you get opposition to it for class/race purposes. They're effectively complaining that an area of a city is become safer, with better amenities. Oh the humanity!

In both the UK and Australia, I've lived in suburbs that had a history of social deprivation. But over the years/decades, as more people moved in for work purposes, or young families move in as the houses are more affordable, the quality of the suburbs increased, Where as in a decade or two in the past, the area would be know for high crime rates, now they're safe. This benefits the entire population of people living there, new and older residents alike.

Plus, you know, Spike Lee is just a racist troll.
 

Slayven

Member
I can understand opposition to gentrification for financial reasons. Inflating house prices, so the local population can no long afford to buy. but if a suburb is in a prime location, close to business centres, this is inevitable.

What I don't understand is when you get opposition to it for class/race purposes. They're effectively complaining that an area of a city is become safer, with better amenities. Oh the humanity!

In both the UK and Australia, I've lived in suburbs that had a history of social deprivation. But over the years/decades, as more people moved in for work purposes, the quality of the suburbs increased, Where as in a decade or two in the past, the area would be know for high crime rates, now they're safe. This benefits the entire population of people living there, new and older residents alike.

Plus, you know, Spike Lee is just a racist troll.

that his point A few hipsters show up and suddenly there are resources for that area , resources that would have improved the area with the current population. But they were not seen as deserving it.
 
Continued gentrification has meant the house I bought in June 2012 has increased in value by around 60-70k (neighbor in similar house just sold). So m digging it. But I have zero cares about history that is less than 100 years as far as houses go.
 

kick51

Banned
LIP9W1y.jpg



(probably created by a hipster)
 

Dragon

Banned
Yeah no. Sorry Spike. That's not how the country has worked in the past. Now you want to rail against facilities, police not responding the same to predominantly black neighborhoods, that's one thing. Complaining about white people moving into your neighborhood is just fucking stupid.
 

CLEEK

Member
that his point A few hipsters show up and suddenly there are resources for that area before, resources that would have improved the area with teh current population. But they were not seen as deserving it.

Gentrification is not caused by 'a few hipsters'. They're just an easy target. When you get areas 'improve' through an influx of more wealthy people, it's not just baristas with sleeve tattoos. But general professional staff of all races, young families, etc..

If you live in a city with high house prices, new home buyers will look to move to affordable areas. Which in time, will improves the standing of the area.

Gentrification is an inevitable aspect of population growth and housing markets.
 

reckless

Member
that his point A few hipsters show up and suddenly there are resources for that area , resources that would have improved the area with the current population. But they were not seen as deserving it.

Richer people pay more taxes and attract higher class business...
 

Crayons

Banned
Noooo our neighborhoods are getting better :( What about my poor culture? I remember when this neighborhood was unsafe, now you can walk at 3AM with a baby in a stroller!
 
Yeah no. Sorry Spike. That's not how the country has worked in the past. Now you want to rail against facilities, police not responding the same to predominantly black neighborhoods, that's one thing. Complaining about white people moving into your neighborhood is just fucking stupid.

that's not what he's complaining about. he's complaining that only until AFTER white people moved did basic services improve (and drastically) but not before.

I can understand opposition to gentrification for financial reasons. Inflating house prices, so the local population can no long afford to buy or rent there. Low wage workers forced to live further out, increasing commute time and travel costs. But if a suburb is in a prime location, close to business centres, this is inevitable.

What I don't understand is when you get opposition to it for class/race purposes. They're effectively complaining that an area of a city is become safer, with better amenities. Oh the humanity!

In both the UK and Australia, I've lived in suburbs that had a history of social deprivation. But over the years/decades, as more people moved in for work purposes, or young families move in as the houses are more affordable, the quality of the suburbs increased, Where as in a decade or two in the past, the area would be know for high crime rates, now they're safe. This benefits the entire population of people living there, new and older residents alike.

Plus, you know, Spike Lee is just a racist troll.

but it only ever benefits one group of people only. always.
 

pj

Banned
I'm always confused about what the "culture" is that we're losing when poor neighborhoods are gentrified. I lived in crown heights which is in the early stages of gentrification and all my neighborhood had was hair salons, bodegas, chinese food, and store front churches. What is the world losing when those places start getting replaced with bars and coffee shops?

It sucks that people are displaced by horrendous rents. I am eventually going to be priced out of Fort Greene, just like I was priced out of Williamsburg. I just don't buy the culture argument. I also don't buy the "you didn't discover it" point that spike raises. Black people have only been in most of these neighborhoods for < 50 years. They displaced whoever came before them, and they displaced the people before that
 
Hawaiians are dealing with this too as property goes up.

The fact that neighborhoods are going to change is just a part of our social structure. People want to live in desirable areas. Proximity to labor, climate, etc etc. How do you stop migration for these reasons? Why is it wrong that people migrate?

To me the problem is the system in place that affects people of color in disproportionate ways. There's not enough wealthy minorities. If we accept that everyone is equal, and we should accept this, then there has to be something systematically causing / aiding the cause of this disproportion. That and the lack of social safety nets for the people being displaced (poor).
 

CLEEK

Member
but it only ever benefits one group of people only. always.

Yes. The group of people who live there.

Gentrification is not a new thing. It's not a process designed by the evil cabal of white people to further torment the lives of black people. Depending on the city/suburb, gentrification happens in historically white areas too.
 

whytemyke

Honorary Canadian.
You know it's easy for him to bitch but is he putting wealth back into the community?

Gentrification is such a first world problem it's almost insulting to hear people bitch about it. You don't hear anyone in Detroit bitching about it. Know why? Cuz making room for an Applebee's is better than burying your dead kids.
 

IceCold

Member
This happens in many poorer neighborhoods. Artsie people move in due to low rent, then demand of the area increases due to it being hip. Then the artsie people leave the area because they can't afford living there anymore, and you are left with rich people living in a neighborhood that lost its coolness factor. At some point I assume the rich people will leave the neighborhood, demand will decrease, and the cycle will continue.
 

Yaboosh

Super Sleuth
You know it's easy for him to bitch but is he putting wealth back into the community?

Gentrification is such a first world problem it's almost insulting to hear people bitch about it. You don't hear anyone in Detroit bitching about it. Know why? Cuz making room for an Applebee's is better than burying your dead kids.


Being forced out of your lifelong neighborhood because of skyrocketing rents clearly sucks though.
 

water_wendi

Water is not wet!
Are basic services in a particular neighborhood paid for by only that neighborhood? Wouldn't general services be paid for by the city as a whole?
If an area is poor and has no business pull the city can neglect and there is nothing people can do. If there is a lot of money in the area with business people who can use the influence and clout that money brings to make things happen. If the area was wealthy to begin with and the city ignored them despite them being flush with money then a case can be argued that its a racial issue. Otherwise the reason for why things have changed is plain as day and its not because the city wants to help the white people. Green is the only color that matters.
 

Quixzlizx

Member
Are basic services in a particular neighborhood paid for by only that neighborhood? Wouldn't general services be paid for by the city as a whole?

If poor people become disenchanted by a lack of services and move out of the city, the city's finances are unchanged, or perhaps even slightly improved if they were poor enough to use social services.

If rich people become disenchanted by a lack of services and leave, the city loses its tax base.
 
Clearly they should all move into $32 million dollar mansions in the Upper East Side like Spike.

He does make some good points though. But I think he's looking at it with a slanted view. There are merit and culture is forever changing and developing anyways.
 

Crayons

Banned
How sad that this is what you took away from all this.

Feel free to call me ignorant from the comfort of your middle class neighborhood. I'm not gonna cry when my neighborhood gets better. I don't look at the heroin needles on the ground and say "Wow, such rich culture! This is worth protecting!

Being against gentrification is being against capitalism itself.
 
I think the situation in SF and Silicon Valley is showing that white, middle class people aren't all that happy about gentrification either. I don't really see it as something that you can fight against, though the public services picking up just because the neighbors got richer is fucking bullshit, that shouldn't be happening.
 

Ahasverus

Member
Yeah, I've always hated how native americans were removed from their lands.
Oh wait.

However, I'm concerned for the black/minority groups fighting. Their neighborhoods were their only safe heaven from discrimination, and probably many of those families can't just be "relocated" withuot facing racism. That's a real problem.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom