WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Internet's primary oversight body approved a plan Wednesday to create a virtual red-light district, setting the stage for pornographic Web sites to use new addresses ending in "xxx"
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers said it would begin negotiations with ICM Registry Inc., run by British businessman Stuart Lawley, to iron out technical issues and prices for the new Web addresses.
Adult-oriented sites, a $12 billion industry, probably could begin buying "xxx" addresses as early as fall or winter depending on ICM's plans, ICANN spokesman Kieran Baker said.
The new pornography suffix was among 10 under consideration by the regulatory group, which also recently approved addresses ending in "jobs" and "travel."
ICM contends the "xxx" Web addresses, which it plans to sell for $60 a year, will protect children from online smut if adult sites voluntarily adopt the suffix so filtering software used by families can more effectively block access to those sites.
The $60 price is roughly ten times higher than prices other companies charge for dot-com names.
"It will further help to protect kids," said John Morris, staff counsel at the Washington-based Center for Democracy and Technology. Morris predicted some adult sites will choose to buy "xxx" Web addresses but others will continue to use dot-com.
Source: http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/internet/06/01/internet.porn.ap/index.html?section=cnn_topstories
Nothing too shocking here, but how practical is it to charge 10x as much for a .xxx domain? If the goal is, in part, to "protect kids" I'd imagine the rates should be comparable to .com suffixes to encourage widespread adoption although, as the article notes, some sites will continue to use the .com suffix regardless. I don't altogether see much practicality coming out of increasing the use of suffixes in the commercial sector, as given how embedded .com is in the public's mind, I think most sites will organizations will simply continue to use it.