Alpha testing, Sony boys get the beta.
Definitely not this one as its not an xbox published game.
Can someone please tell me who / what this is from?
Switch 2 is the real winner getting the 1.0 version.
Yeah, I just didn't like the loop. Go out and explore/loot. Go back to base and spend 75% of cash made looting on repairs.Unfortunately for everyone this game is just not all that great.
It's the videogame equivalent of this gif:
To this day I still don't know who any of these guys you and other posters link in this site are. Like I can tell the name because you've posted them here, but as for why their opinion matters to me more than a recently added GAF poster with 2 posts… neither have more weight than the other.Has this shill ever been right or truthful?
Its an immersive, thick atmosphere kind of a game. If you're someone who just wants to run n gun, you won't like it. If you play slowly and enjoy exploring a really nice looks world, its great.
That's exactly how I like to play personally. Really getting sucked into the environment, taking my time, exploring everywhere. Maybe I need to get into this series. Thanks.
You're overthinking it. They talk shit and we laugh at there shit when they get exposed.
Thank you I was going to say SNL so glad I didn't look a fool.
Still no A-Life. I don't even see how they can call it an alpha. It's objectively the least sophisticated STALKER game. We're going backwards.
8 months announcement but "late 2025" means likely November release. 1 year after, I wonder what green rats have to say about that?
What does that mean? Why can't people clearly state their ideas. What is a "slimy platform thing"? Be specific.
It's a reference that showcases Spencer's usual hypocrisy.
It's a reference that showcases Spencer's usual hypocrisy.
You're preaching to the choir. The hypocrisy is that Spencer often calls out timed exclusives, yet he continues doing it himself as Stalker 2 was a known timed exclusive. Thus, people are also calling him out now that the exclusivity window is closed and the game is getting ported.….but this is completely different, though. How does this illustrate a slimy platform thing? It's a game being ported to another console. That literally only benefits people. Timed exclusives have been a thing for 20+ years. How is more people being able to play a game a slimy console thing?
Exclusive DLC for a multi platform game being only on one version is very slimy. Which is what he is stating he is against, in the post you shared. What does that have to do with this game being ported?
But it's not timed exclusives. It's timed exclusive DLC for a game out simultaneously on multiple platforms. Which I agree is super cringe. Glad it's dying off.
www.destructoid.com
I'm not here to argue, I'm just explaining the reference since you asked. If you disagree, feel free to take it up with the original poster.
The lies who said this man with his straight face every fucking single time. What it's more annoying he always tried to appear as the good guy. What asshole.Is it a case of Phil Spencer, lie dispenser?
Multiple times he has said he doesn't like them or in one case in 2015 'isn't their long term strategy' yet here we are in 2020 yet another conference "console world exclusive". We see it every E3 and this years conference.
Here are some links
'Paying for third-party exclusives isn't our long term strategy,' says Xbox's Phil Spencer
Not ‘core’ to Xbox strategy Paying for third-party exclusives isn’t part of Microsoft’s long-term strategy, says Xbox boss Phil Spencer. ...Phil Spencer dislikes timed exclusives
Many have pointed out Xbox's history, however.www.gamereactor.eu
What exactly is going on here. He hates them, but realises yet again they have no FP...
Are we going down this route now where xbox fans are normalising deals for exclusives again? Is there something you want to tell us?….but this is completely different, though. How does this illustrate a slimy platform thing? It's a game being ported to another console. That literally only benefits people. Not to mention the developer themselves. Timed exclusives have been a thing for 20+ years. How is more people being able to play a game a slimy console thing?
Exclusive DLC for a multi platform game being only on one version is very slimy. Which is what he is stating he is against, in the post you shared. What does any of that have to do with this game being ported?
How is talking about helldivers 2 exclusivity related to DLC? The context of that comment is not DLC. It was Ryse and Helldivers 2.
Sure but the context is that Phil/xbox does them while hypocritically complaining about them. This is one of them in the thread. They also didn't say a word when it cost them very little to lock up CoD, GTA content exclusivity in past generations. Nor full games like Mass Effect, Bioshock, Titanfall etc.
The first two games were also horribly broken and people think of them fondly because of literally YEARS of modding.
They probably left the pics from the reveal trailer before the downgrade.
