Lmao, you guys come at this from a position of ignorance.
The PC version of Cyberpunk received great reviews. The major furore was for the console version that shipped in a fundamentally broken state.
There are 17 perfect scores for CP2077 on PC Metacritic. Overall landed at 86% MC.
Metacritic aggregates music, game, tv, and movie reviews from the leading critics. Only Metacritic.com uses METASCORES, which let you know at a glance how each item was reviewed.
www.metacritic.com
Let’s not attempt to revise recent history here.
1. You are overreacting
2. I ll revise whatever i want but this is not even a matter of revision. This is a fact I've seen happened - Cyberpunk got way more hate than Stalker 2, and the negativity was towards all platforms. Maybe a little more on consoles, but the PC version was slammed too.
Stalker 2 is way more broken and got less hate. You can argue, but it's a fact.
Stalker 2:
-has barely functioning core mechanic (A-Life)
-much more animation glitches that Cyberpunk
-Stalker 2 crashes all the time
-requires people to wait for the shader compilation every time they load the game
-and also Stalker 2 has broken quests the cannot be completed.
Stalker 2 feels like an early beta version.
1.1. patch made thousands of fixes. you can look here
https://www.neogaf.com/threads/stal...t-to-this-point.1678700/page-2#post-269930745
This game is sooo broken that the devs had to make almost 2000 fixes month after the release. Overall they will probably make tens of thousand of fixes. Cyberpunk never had to fix this much, cause it always were less broken.
3. Did you open your link? Critics can suck my ass, Cyberpunk on PC STILL has a yellow user rating of 7.6. Years after the game was "fixed" and received a lot of positive reviews for being "fixed".