PantherLotus
Professional Schmuck
Well that's a bold claim.
it's a natural conclusion to the the question: if there are, where are they?
Well that's a bold claim.
Thanks for the update but the article didn't mention anything about conclusive evidence with regards to Tabby's Star. It appears that scientists are providing yet another hypothesis (this time using mathematical modeling) that so far seems to fit with what we're observing. A conclusive solution has not been provided.
The dream lives.
Assuming one can't travel faster than the speed of light, it's extremely unlikely that a "civilization" would seek to travel far away unless it did so as a whole. If they spread separately, they will experience different things and mutate, not necessarily just physically but socially, culturally, mentally. Their knowledge will start to differ from one another, and soon enough they would be so different as to potentially have competing agendas. What one would consider true, another could consider false because they don't have the same knowledge. This can only be avoided if you can travel or send information faster than light, in which case vast distances don't prevent the "civilization" from staying homogeneous.
This is true even if said civilization became machines or anything else. It's why Von Neumann probes don't make any sense, unless DNA is Von Neumann probes that were sent out to eventually evolve into intelligent species that would re-discover knowledge stored in some data banks somewhere and pick up the torch from there.
Thanks for the update but the article didn't mention anything about conclusive evidence with regards to Tabby's Star. It appears that scientists are providing yet another hypothesis (this time using mathematical modeling) that so far seems to fit with what we're observing. A conclusive solution has not been provided.
The dream lives.
it's a natural conclusion to the the question: if there are, where are they?
it's a natural conclusion to the the question: if there are, where are they?
We are monkeys who are just barely getting past the radio signal communication stage, if you think we have the tech or scientific understanding to locate the super civilizations out there then you are quite naive about where we are in our history.
To use our current tech, look out into the cosmos, and come to the conclusion "welp, we must be it" is akin to looking out your bedroom window and trying to see a piece of kelp in a trench at the lowest part of the ocean and coming to the conclusion that there is none because you can't see it from your current state.
The question isn't necessarily about us. It's more like "if there is such advanced life, why haven't they contacted us".
Well that's a bold claim.
We are monkeys who are just barely getting past the radio signal communication stage, if you think we have the tech or scientific understanding to locate the super civilizations out there then you are quite naive about where we are in our history.
To use our current tech, look out into the cosmos, and come to the conclusion "welp, we must be it" is akin to looking out your bedroom window and trying to see a piece of kelp in a trench at the lowest part of the ocean and coming to the conclusion that there is none because you can't see it from your current state.
We don't know but human technological limitations mean we can't say yes or no to that question. Only know-it-alls think they have an answer.
no. this is a paradox. not a question with an answer. there is no conclusion. it's a set of facts that conflict with other facts. that's it. that's why it's a paradox.
So... it just got weirder: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QlQc7XYxmk
https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.02535
A group of astronomers looked for signs of intelligent life on over 5600 stars close to our planet. More precisely, they looked for sources of laser light that couldn't be produced naturally.
While there was no actual positive sign for any of the targets, they got some potentially 'false positives', and guess which star showed up... yup.
So... it just got weirder: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QlQc7XYxmk
https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.02535
A group of astronomers looked for signs of intelligent life on over 5600 stars close to our planet. More precisely, they looked for sources of laser light that couldn't be produced naturally.
While there was no actual positive sign for any of the targets, they got some potentially 'false positives', and guess which star showed up... yup.
super civilization does not mean 'able to FTL'
light speed may be a hard limit
These bumps. I hope we get a definitive answer one day.
So... it just got weirder: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QlQc7XYxmk
https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.02535
A group of astronomers looked for signs of intelligent life on over 5600 stars close to our planet. More precisely, they looked for sources of laser light that couldn't be produced naturally.
While there was no actual positive sign for any of the targets, they got some potentially 'false positives', and guess which star showed up... yup.
I knew it. I never lost faith.
Phycisists Hate Him!Given the rapid changes in understanding of physics in the last century, i find it hard to believe that there isn't some trick around the speed of light.
So... it just got weirder: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QlQc7XYxmk
https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.02535
A group of astronomers looked for signs of intelligent life on over 5600 stars close to our planet. More precisely, they looked for sources of laser light that couldn't be produced naturally.
While there was no actual positive sign for any of the targets, they got some potentially 'false positives', and guess which star showed up... yup.
So... it just got weirder: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QlQc7XYxmk
https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.02535
A group of astronomers looked for signs of intelligent life on over 5600 stars close to our planet. More precisely, they looked for sources of laser light that couldn't be produced naturally.
While there was no actual positive sign for any of the targets, they got some potentially 'false positives', and guess which star showed up... yup.
So... it just got weirder: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QlQc7XYxmk
https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.02535
A group of astronomers looked for signs of intelligent life on over 5600 stars close to our planet. More precisely, they looked for sources of laser light that couldn't be produced naturally.
While there was no actual positive sign for any of the targets, they got some potentially 'false positives', and guess which star showed up... yup.
🌚🌝
So... it just got weirder: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QlQc7XYxmk
https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.02535
A group of astronomers looked for signs of intelligent life on over 5600 stars close to our planet. More precisely, they looked for sources of laser light that couldn't be produced naturally.
While there was no actual positive sign for any of the targets, they got some potentially 'false positives', and guess which star showed up... yup.
So... it just got weirder: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QlQc7XYxmk
https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.02535
A group of astronomers looked for signs of intelligent life on over 5600 stars close to our planet. More precisely, they looked for sources of laser light that couldn't be produced naturally.
While there was no actual positive sign for any of the targets, they got some potentially 'false positives', and guess which star showed up... yup.
It's not impossible for a star to produce lasers by itself:Why are they 'false positives'? Aren't they just positives?
Why are they 'false positives'? Aren't they just positives?
We found no such laser emission coming from the planetary region around any of the 5600 stars.
There are some ways to move between two points at a speed people would consider FTL without actually moving through space at FTL, which is what is dissalowed. The most popular is the Alcubierre Warp Drive, which basically cheats and solves the Einstein Field Equations around a negative mass.Given the rapid changes in understanding of physics in the last century, i find it hard to believe that there isn't some trick around the speed of light.
Super cool, thanks for the update.
Strange coincidence that it would be this star, but if I'm correct it's been labeled a false positive a few times already in different tests. Fun nonetheless. And I'm sure there are technologically superior dudes and dudettes out there, but who knows if they are in our galaxy and when.
They are signaling "LOL TRUMP" in morse.
I'm stupid. What does that actually mean?