Dreams-Visions
Member
This.
To try and zero in on one actor as the crux of the prequel trilogy debacle is a foolish errand. The films don't work because they tell rather than show, and they're a sterilized, lazy CGI fest.
Let's face it: Lucas had far too much control over these movies, no producers to reign him in and was a lazy director who wanted to rely on CGI. The script, as we all know, was garbage. The characters aren't relatable. Also, he got away with choosing unknown cast and crew in the past, but it bit him in the ass with Christensen. The guy was not some diamond in the rough; he was an subpar teen actor with basically no range or subtlety who was asked to carry a lot of water for the movie. Go back and watch Hamill's work with Yoda when he's dying. That's a potentially silly scene, but he makes you believe. Big difference.
I don't place it squarely on Christensen (as that's what I'm arguing you shouldn't do), but he wasn't able to handle what the role required. That said, all actors were sabotaged by bad set design, too much CGI and a non-existent script. The whole endeavor was a money-making venture that had "artistic merit" as a distant companion.
A fine assessment.
All of which makes me wonder about people who "loved" the prequils. I wish I could see what they saw and not...well...the reality of things. I inherently want to love everything that presents itself as Star Wars. It pains me that I can't watch and enjoy 3 cannon films like I could with the original trilogy.