Permanent.
Who knows about future "Ultra Turbo EX Whatever" editions, if such future editions ever exist, but this initial release is just PS4.
Street Fighter 5 for PS4 & PC teaser trailer
- Thread starter UnluckyKate
- Start date
Permanent.
Who knows about future "Ultra Turbo EX Whatever" editions, if such future editions ever exist, but this initial release is just PS4.
mugoldeneagle03
Member
Is it just me or did no one complain nearly as much during the PS2/3 ages about exclusivity? Or did I just miss it...
Also seeing how 95% of 3rd party "exclusives" end up on the other console anyways I wouldn't be terribly worried XB1 owners.
Also seeing how 95% of 3rd party "exclusives" end up on the other console anyways I wouldn't be terribly worried XB1 owners.
Orochinagis
Member
I guess Capcom went the Activision route and is giving exclusive games to each platform.
Ewww. Why would you want this?!
Pathfinder
Member
They're not wrong. Capcom had how many different versions of SF2, SF3, SF4, etc?
It's more likely than not that we will see some flavor of SF5 on Xbox One at some point in time, just not this initial one.
Tomb Raider will be.
Dead Rising has always been MS though, so they are catering to existing fanbase.
And Monster Hunter is probably Cappy's biggest franchise now and it's only on 3DS.
Would be nice, very nice. But not a chance in hell of it happening.
The trailer itself makes a big deal about exclusivity.
I'm assuming the more platforms they want to keep it from, the more money they'd have to pony up to compensate for that loss of potential revenue. That's assuming the agreement was indeed them moneyhatting for exclusivity, and not a Bayonetta 2 scenario where Sony was the sole reason the game exists - but I have a difficult time believing that considering the fact that there's a PC version.
The 360 was the superior console for Capcom games last generation though and received all of the bigger fighting games up until the last year or so.
NinjaMouse
Member
Yep...I agree. Personally, I think it makes the whole thing a little more fun. As an XBone owner who recently bought a Wii U, I was thinking this morning, "well, I guess I've got to put aside some pennies for a PS4 now...dammit". In the end, I want more reasons to buy one.
Chobel
Member
DAMN!
SolidSnakeUS
Member
Wasn't it like 2 years ago or so when EVO would go primarily Xboxes? I'm sure it's going to have to change again.
Same. I am happy with games like Bayonetta 2 as that would not have been made without Nintendo, but something like this would have been made regardless, so in reality it is just stopping many people from playing the game, unless they buy a new console.
I'd argue that this doesn't keep things competitive or "keep gaming alive and well". I'd argue that innovation within games as well as platform features and services is what can do that. All this is doing is getting people to throw money at each other to hold a game or others in a penalty box for a while, or indefinitely, more frequently. It hardy improves everything else other than providing something to market
Coulomb_Barrier
Member
There's a couple reasons why this is not as bad as MS and Tomb Raider:
1. PS4 doesn't have half the install base/marketshare of the Xbone, so the majority of console owners aren't getting blown out with this deal like was the case with TR. It also makes a lot more fucking sense because of the current console marketshare. TR deal doesn't make any sense whatsoever! :/
2. Street Fighter has never had the vast majority of the fighting game hardcore on Xbox, it's always been on Playstation and associated with PS. So again, the hardcore fans of the series aren't getting bummed out like was the case with TR, which was also a traditional PS franchise. I don't think you can say the same with SF and Xbox, in all honesty.
But I know that doesn't make this deal any harder to swallow if you are a Bone owner.
GG looks so much better art wise. Not sure why Capcom wouldn't go for that. SF 3 remains the last one eith great art direction.
Xion_Stellar
People should stop referencing data that makes me feel uncomfortable because games get ported to platforms I don't like
No that proves my point Dead Rising 2 did come to PS3 and Monster Hunter started on PS2 and was exclusive to PS2 and PSP (with the exception of Monster Hunet Frontier for PC in Asia at the time) before switching to Nintendo Cosonles I'm just saying that Capcom sporadically changing hats like this is not new.
is it not possible technically?
Why?
Freshmaker
I am Korean.
Probably until Super or Turbo or Super Turbo etc. Whatever they call the first major revision.
Possibly, but did TR even get announced for any platforms when it was first revealed?
But RE6 fell short of sales expectations and SFIV outsold it by a decent amount, iirc. I'm sure they could have funded it, but Sony probably offered to pay or help pay for it.
No, you know why you're a fanboy. I've seen your posts and you've been called out for your posts several times.
nephilimdj
Member
backgrounds look so good, made by 8ing?
ThoughtsOfSpeaking
Banned
Wait.
Forget the Xbox one...everyone got so wrapped up in system wars crap that something far more important was missed.
THERE WAS NO MENTION OF AN ARCADE VERSION. AT ALL.
Forget the Xbox one...everyone got so wrapped up in system wars crap that something far more important was missed.
THERE WAS NO MENTION OF AN ARCADE VERSION. AT ALL.
Aside form the year where Sony sponsored Evo I believe SF4 and Marvel have always been run on 360 due to PS3 having lag issues with certain characters and stages.
::mind blown::
You're right (haha). It has to be coming right!?!? Would seem strange for it not to.
This is a good point, it makes people hungry, if Assassins Creed went Xbone only, that would force Sony's hand and they'd make a game completing for the people who want to play that type of game
Both Sony and MS need to carve out an identity for themselves to stop themselves just being seen as "weak PCs"
I'd rather they fund new IP than buy out stuff like with Tomb Raider and potentially this, though
gioGAF
Member
MEGA-fucking-TON son!
Of course that is assuming this is a true console exclusive for at least a year. During that time span, the community will already be set on PS4 and releasing it on the bone will only catch stragglers and casuals.
Hopefully this shows that Japanese companies will get behind the Sony console again and provide us with a wealth of content. That they will focus on what they do best instead of forcing what they believe the "West" wants in a game. Too many stupid games last generation from Capcom and other Japanese publishers. They should feel more at ease with the development costs since, dare I say it, the King is back!!!
Of course that is assuming this is a true console exclusive for at least a year. During that time span, the community will already be set on PS4 and releasing it on the bone will only catch stragglers and casuals.
Hopefully this shows that Japanese companies will get behind the Sony console again and provide us with a wealth of content. That they will focus on what they do best instead of forcing what they believe the "West" wants in a game. Too many stupid games last generation from Capcom and other Japanese publishers. They should feel more at ease with the development costs since, dare I say it, the King is back!!!
Oh right, forgot that was timed. Well, I also hope the subsequent 14 versions of SFV will come to the Bone. These are two franchises that at the start of this generation I think most of us expected to stay on both platforms.
WordsintheWater
Member
3. Rise of the Tomb Raider is a sequel to a game that released on PS3 and Xbox360 last generation and had a definitive edition released for PS4 and Xbox One
wapplew
Member
I think they just go for boarder appeal.
Why would that specific trailer have to tell you that information, considering where it will be shown? The Arcade version is incredibly likely, but doesn't need to be in that trailer at all
notworksafe
Member
Hard to test an F2P game in an arcade.
Can't wait for that announcement to get people worked up. Capcom and Ono did their F2P test run with Deep Down, now it's time to apply that to SF.
Slap a new coat of paint on SF4, charge $5 for stages, taunts, ultras, costumes, characters, and BP boosts and they are good to go.
For point 2, the SFIV series is most popular on the 360 compared to the PS3 and PC versions. Even in Japan where the 360 was a flop their players preferred the 360 version. The hardcore just go to where the best version is.
Sure, let's keep making facts up to justify the exact same behaviour from different companies. I own both consoles and that doesn't make me less disappointed.
So SF5 being exclusive is a sign things are changing for the better? Ok now.
People need to stop with this "associated with the PS brand" bullshit when it comes to SF. If its associated with anything its the arcade, then the home versions were on every console.
Sf4 was a multi game released on almost everything. All of those points are incorrect
SuperSonic1305
Member
This may be the saltiest thread since DQ9. Everyone should already know you wait 4 or 5 re-releases before buying Street Fighter anyway. I got burned buying SF4 at launch. It won't happen again.
Projectjustice
Banned
Jesus stop that noise. Keep that F2P out of SF.
ThoughtsOfSpeaking
Banned
If there is no arcade version, im going to lean more towards this not being made without Sony.
It would be travesty regardless. A console only Street fighter? Perish the thought.
Yeah right, like you personally know me. But keep acting like you do.
You know why I've been bashing MS since E3 2010? Because of the shit that they do (& still do, as a matter of fact). And the reason why you & the rest have been "calling me out several times" is because you can't handle the truth everytime someone like myself speaks out facts about your beloved company (& I've been one of those who were against Sony back in 2005-2008 with the way that they've handled both PSP & PS3).
Capcom are the masters of 4th Factioning (Glory Hunters to you Non-Planetsiders) then, only going to those who will give them the glory.
I wonder if this would happen (or cost Sony more probably) if Xbox managed to start off a bit better.
Maybe if Capcom sold Mega-Man to Nintendo, they'd get some money...just a thought.
360's ease of development definitely made it the choice for all character action and fighting games. Can't say they have that advantage this gen.