Super Smash Bros Wii U & 3DS Thread 4: New Year, Old Arguments
- Thread starter IntelliHeath
- Start date
But it's still in development! The nose could get fixed >.>
theprodigy
Member
#TeamViridi
wait what
wait what
#TeamReal, yo. Mark it.
Pop-O-Matic
Banned
SkullHydra
Member
That's some bogus! The game is still in development. We've seen several small changes to Link's face already.
Same here. Getting a picture early seems unlikely, but I think it's like 60-40 of Palu being playable vs not.
Solid SOAP
Member
I just don't understand why the show is so awkward, it's like it's not real gameplay just close-up shots of Mario & Palutena.
Sounds reasonable, the bet should be about this Palutena in the pictures rather than her just being in the game in general.
Is that really fair though? The game is still in development, and clearly Palutena isn't ready to be revealed yet, otherwise she would have been shown off already. I say it should count as a win if there are many clear similarities between the leaked model and the final one.
BigEvilTurtle
Banned
#TeamReal
Hyperactivity
Banned
Baron von Loathsome
Member
Palutena's nose has to be edited into their avatar.
Megidolaon
Member
*checks Smash thread for the first time in a few days*
Wait there's still a debate about that screen? I thought it was confirmed fake!? So there's a chance Palutena is actually playable? Hot dawg!
Wait there's still a debate about that screen? I thought it was confirmed fake!? So there's a chance Palutena is actually playable? Hot dawg!
BigEvilTurtle
Banned
*checks Smash thread for the first time in a few days*
Wait there's still a debate about that screen? I thought it was confirmed fake!? So there's a chance Palutena is actually playable? Hot dawg!
Where did you hear that it was confirmed fake?
I don't see why that arbitrary rule should apply. It's still in development and it could easily be tweaked between now and the reveal. Slightly different lips wouldn't mean that the leak was fake at all.
They have to adopt iDOLM@STER avatars.
There are worse punishments.
IntelliHeath
As in "Heathcliff"
I'm looking at those reactions. I don't think teams would work since people would blame it on models being updated since it's in development.
It's easy to predict what Palutena would dress in the game.
I don't notice anything like that so I'm not sure if it's good idea to do team real and team fake if the models are "subjected" to be changed.
I'm talking about leaked Palutena Model itself. Palutena being in game is no brainer to many people out there, but I'm not confident enough to see her being in the game as 100% sure.
How is it fair if the fake model is just actually made up by leaker, and Sakurai's model just happened to be very similar because Kid Icarus Uprising were inspired by Brawl's models with some adjustments.
It's easy to predict what Palutena would dress in the game.
I don't notice anything like that so I'm not sure if it's good idea to do team real and team fake if the models are "subjected" to be changed.
I'm talking about leaked Palutena Model itself. Palutena being in game is no brainer to many people out there, but I'm not confident enough to see her being in the game as 100% sure.
How is it fair if the fake model is just actually made up by leaker, and Sakurai's model just happened to be very similar because Kid Icarus Uprising were inspired by Brawl's models with some adjustments.
MisterHero
Super Member
Palutena would be nice. I'd rather have Impa though.
Fine. You have to adopt Miki avatars. Can't get any worse than that.
That's not a punishment (especially if I get to use Makoto)
Regarding the model again, I think it should count as a win if the majority of the model is the same, and the final model is clearly the model shown in the leaked photos. It's not fair if the model literally looks the exact same with a tweaked nose and TeamReal takes a loss.
Megidolaon
Member
Oh I saw a video of it on Youtube and all the comments were saying it was confirmed fake, so I just erased it from my mind. But yeah, random commenters are no confirmation of course. I just assumed. I'm happy it might be real. Palutena's a cool character.
Well I'm sure this pose
Would be a simply indicator of whether the final model (assuming she gets it) is the same one as seen in the leaked photos.
Would be a simply indicator of whether the final model (assuming she gets it) is the same one as seen in the leaked photos.
Technically this is about the pictures rather than believing Palutena will be in game. So you can be #TeamFake and still hope for her.
Uncle0wnage
Member
To refute the cloud post from the last page, I have shown you what it really looks like overlayed.
Mushroomer25
Member
I'll go for #TeamFake on this one. It looks very legitimate, I just have a rule of absolutely never trusting Smash "leaks".
To refute the cloud post from the last page, I have shown you what it really looks like overlayed.
Good job.
CombustingFetus
Neo Member
#TeamItDoesn'tMatterIfItIsRealOrNotBecausePalutenaWillProbablyBeInRegardless
Eh. The bit of cloud that I pointed out is missing is still missing. You can see it slowly disappearing with the fade.
But in my post I actually say I feel her lifeless model is what seals the deal for me.
Really all I'm doing to showing reasons why you should just assume it's real to prevent people getting disappointed.
Even if the clouds are static images that ignore angle, don't they still scale with distance? The fake shot is way more zoomed in than the one you're overlaying it on.
Totally agreed.
Uncle0wnage
Member
But really, no confirmation or deconfirmation can be extrapolated from the clouds.
The clouds won't scale very much in comparison to the models because they are a skybox, the let's say 50 ft we zoomed in from a normal camera angle is like 50 feet zoomed in of 5000 ft to the edge of the skybox. So we went from 55 to 5 feet away from the characters, but only 5050 to 5000 away from the skybox, the scaling would be negligible.
The clouds won't scale very much in comparison to the models because they are a skybox, the let's say 50 ft we zoomed in from a normal camera angle is like 50 feet zoomed in of 5000 ft to the edge of the skybox. So we went from 55 to 5 feet away from the characters, but only 5050 to 5000 away from the skybox, the scaling would be negligible.
Fidelis Hodie
Infidelis Cras
I'll sign up for team real. It's just too good.
foxuzamaki
Doesn't read OPs, especially not his own
#teamagnostic.
