DerZuhälter
Member
Audience: "You can't possibly make Superman less patriotic and relatable!"
WB: "Hold my beer..."
WB: "Hold my beer..."
I thought joss whedon was suppose to salvage the DCU ?
Just a question, is this paved out as a 'Superman is now a communist and evil' sort of deal or is it played more interestingly?
John Schnepp from collider seems to think Josh Whedon is actually there to make Justice League 2 after fixing 1.What gave you that idea? He's finishing Justice League right now as a favor to WB and Snyder, for obvious reasons, and I doubt his Batgirl movie will set the direction for the entire DCEU.
I don't think he wants that kind of pressure anymore.
I thought joss whedon was suppose to salvage the DCU ? This sounds so bad and wrong for superman right now.
John Schnepp from collider seems to think Josh is actually there to make Justice League 2 after fixing 1.
Just a question, is this paved out as a 'Superman is now a communist and evil' sort of deal or is it played more interestingly?
DC does realize that the one film people actually liked from them was the one that wasn't a deconstruction, right? That feels like something they should keep in mind.
DerZuhälter;241947802 said:Audience: "You can't possibly make Superman less patriotic and relatable!"
WB: "Hold my beer..."
Well, Superman shouldn't be patriotic imo.
Hopefully Henry Cavill.who will play superman?
Doing it purely as an "Elseworlds," instead of just a new solo Superman film in the DCEU would be a little frustrating for me, as someone who wants to see just a really well-made classic Superman story on the screen.
Why do they hate Supes?
I have the opposite opinion to you. I'd like to see Elsewods because I'm not a comic book reader and haven't seen these stories before. I've seen the Donner and Superman Returns films and want something new...
As long as it doesn't include Russian Batman. That never made sense to me.
Batman's nightmare in BvS could easily be retcon to be red son. Shits already right there. Retcon and be done with it.
Why do they hate Supes?
One, how about we get superman right before doing weird superman.
Trust me I would love a crime synidcate of america movie as much as everyone else who wants to see ultraman snort krypto-cocaine. But that works once you have an established character who has done well in the medium for quite a while.
Also, might be the... best time for that... maybe.
That's my point though. There's so much rich material to pull from in more "traditional" Superman stories that hasn't been utilized for the films. They could do something really great with a Brainiac story, they could do something inspired by All-Star Superman, they could do Bizzaro, or President Luthor (something that could also be quite timely).
Lots of wonderful ways to offer something new, without going in this direction yet. Which, I don't feel like is a bad direction, but isn't the right direction for the character right now. As another poster said, you gotta construct before you can deconstruct. It'd be like doing "Logan" in 2005. Wouldn't nearly have had as much impact if done so early on.
It's also got the usual Mark Millar pants on head stupid ending.He's not evil. He's still Superman - wanting to help the most people he can, however he can - just raised as an authoritarian. No real heroes or villains.
It's a pretty basic "power corrupts" story. More interesting in theory than in practice. But the skeleton is good if you like Superman in concept.
It's also got the usual Mark Millar pants on head stupid ending.
It's also got the usual Mark Millar pants on head stupid ending.
Never really got this line of thinking. You can pretty much deconstruct or whatever as long as the movie is well-made. What made Logan have such an impact was because it was a damn fine movie.
Flash literally appeared after that scene to warn bruce about something. Could be darkseid, could be him fucking up the timeline. They could absolutely retcon the flash screwing up the timeline thus expanding the DCEU.Except there is no modern day Soviet Union. It wouldn't make sense.
The only improvement the movie would need to the original story is the depiction of Wonder Woman.
It was a Mark Millar story, so she was treated as a disposable object.
There is no way they are seriously considering this.
Logan is a great movie, but a big part of why it works as well as it does is because of the decades-long relationship viewers have with Hugh and Patrick as Logan and Charles. People grew to love their interpretation of the characters, so it made everything that happens in that movie exponentially more heart-breaking.
Now, a Red Son movie probably isn't going for the gut-punches that Logan was.. Yet, I think for a movie like this to have an impact, people have to actually care about Cavil's take on Supes, which I'm not wholly convinced most folks do at this point.
heh, the ending is what I like most about the story.
(It was actually Grant Morrison's idea)
Yep.Look, this would be pretty cool, but I feel like it is the sort of thing you do AFTER you have a solid foothold with audiences and they let you do crazy shit.
This is the equivalent of Marvel doing Guardians before Thor.
So this was Zack Snyder's account all alongBecause he sucks.