zero_suit said:It's a legitimate argument. Did Sampras have any rivals that owned him or at least had a winning record against him?
In majors, Federer is 2-5 against Nadal, 7-13 overall.
Sure, Federer has the numbers, but can you really say he's the GOAT when he basically has no answers for Nadal?
Not really a legitimate arguement... most people agree that Nadal is clay GOAT and if you take out the clay meetings, Fed is 5-4 against Nadal and 2-2 in majors.
Also, Sampras would always lose to nobodies in clay tournaments (and non-clay ones too), so he never got the chance to lose to great clay players multiple times. If Fed lost in the early rounds of clay tournaments like Sampras, he would have never got the chance to meet Nadal in finals and the head to head would be closer. Also, Nadal is 5 years younger than Fed. What if Agassi was the same age as Sampras... how would things have turned out?