• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Texas Abortion Limits Struck Down by U.S. Supreme Court

Status
Not open for further replies.
*knock knock*

It's just your reminder about how important the SCOTUS is, how important filling that vacant seat is, and how your vote this November matters.

Even if congress is tied up, the SCOTUS can still Get Shit Done.
 
Fucking THANK YOU. Goddamn Supreme Court, you're rulings are like thirty-eight percent okay, I'm so glad this one was positive. People trying to roll back reproductive rights on the state level win a good portion of the time, and I'm glad they didn't in such a largely binding case.
 
If this court gets a 5-4 or even maybe 6-3 liberal majority, they are gonna mow down every conservative precedent in this country.
 
Holy shit I always just thought that abortion was legal in this country and that was the end of it. I had no idea these kind of obstructions existed in some states.

Oh yeah, they've done everything but ban it in a lot of states. Here in Mississippi, we only have one abortion clinic, and they barely meet the stupid requirements that try to force them out because of the doctor's there who give a ton of their time, money, and energy to keep it open.
 

FelixOrion

Poet Centuriate
Cl9rBMUWAAAenJX.jpg


sonned

they got
tumblr_lxpcadRmqA1qiohboo1_250.gif
'd
 

tcrunch

Member
Hopefully they can keep it up with whatever other stupid legislation pro-lifers try to deny women access to both abortions and healthcare.
 
Really surprised to see Kennedy side with the Liberal justices on an issue that involves abortion.

He did the same thing when the court validated Obamacare. I bet a lot of conservatives are feeling buyers remorse over him, but fuck those guys. Kennedy values common sense over ideolotry.
 

Jhriad

Member
Too bad a lot of clinics have already long since shuttered in Texas. Where I live a Pro Life organization intentionally moved into the abandoned Planned Parenthood building as soon as they left.
 
Too bad a lot of clinics have already long since shuttered in Texas. Where I live a Pro Life organization intentionally moved into the abandoned Planned Parenthood building as soon as they left.

Definitely sucks for those in Texas but luckily the damage from this law didn't make it to the other 49.
 

BriGuy

Member
That's good news. I thought for sure I was going to see another 4 to 4 tie today.

I wonder if the proponents of these "safety measures" would also get behind new laws shuttering all gun stores not immediately adjacent to police stations. You know, to be safe.
 

_Ryo_

Member
Thank Jesus!

Was such bullshit restrictions that literally put millions of lives at risk. I'm glad to see some sanity prevail in the SCOTUS today.
 
If this court gets a 5-4 or even maybe 6-3 liberal majority, they are gonna mow down every conservative precedent in this country.

Looking at the ages of the current justices, if the next president serves two terms and congress holds up Garland's nomination until the next president takes office like they're posturing to do, the court could realistically be 7-2 in either direction.
 

Link

The Autumn Wind
Thing is if you want to prevent abortions you probably would be better off making things sex education, birth control, and other prophylactics more widely available.
Except Republicans are against all of those things too. Funny that.
 

Jenov

Member
Great ruling! Very happy to hear this, it was obvious how underhanded these laws were becoming, and would have been a gross misjustice to allow them to continue.
 

digdug2k

Member
Just curious, because everyone is making it sound like there is a big reason why it's more harmful than beneficial: what is wrong with holding a clinic to "surgical" standards? Is that just ridiculous for what happens during the procedure or something?
Yes, its ridiculous for what happens during the procedure. The radio said the Justices even pointed out that there are less strict standards for things like colonoscopys, and there's 100x greater risk of someone dying during a colonoscopy (but you won't see any laws to change that because it would put a huge burden on people and create a larger public health risk to restrict them more).

Its like saying "Every doctors office should really have clean rooms for each patient, so that they don't spread their colds to one another" which then instantly leads to shutting down all doctors offices in the state.
 

Beartruck

Member
The particularly bizarre thing about this proposition is it would actually disproportionately increase the number of new US citizens born from Mexican families, which seems at odds with the goal of tighter immigration control.
Are you suggesting GOP positions are counter productive and destructive to even their own goals? How dare you sir. /s
 

Coolluck

Member
nah, even texan lawyers wouldn't lie directly to the supreme court. they spun it as well as they could but it was so obvious that even kennedy wasn't swayed.

the other good one was when texas said nobody in the rural western part of the state would lose access to abortions since they could go to new mexico, at which point ginsberg noted that new mexico doesn't have these regulations and asked why it was ok for texas women to use those clinics if this was really about women's health.

She was talking about El Paso which isn't rural but just basically New Mexico and not Texas. But yeah, I loved that quote.
 
nah, even texan lawyers wouldn't lie directly to the supreme court. they spun it as well as they could but it was so obvious that even kennedy wasn't swayed.

the other good one was when texas said nobody in the rural western part of the state would lose access to abortions since they could go to new mexico, at which point ginsberg noted that new mexico doesn't have these regulations and asked why it was ok for texas women to use those clinics if this was really about women's health.
Isn't it a crime to commit perjury when testifying before the Supreme Court? Or could Texas officials have tried to be vague enough to claim ignorance on the matter? I was reading articles that some of the materials on their findings were suspiciously redacted. Wouldn't surprise me given this lot. But this was the case involving Wendy Davis. correct?

And how would this scenario play out had Scalia been alive? And if Scalia were present to cast a vote, might this have even affected how Kennedy had voted? He's usually been quite hostile in regards to abortion rights. That's usually been the irony of Kennedy... that he's courteous to gays but quite indifferent to reproductive issues.
 

Rayis

Member
I'm still very upset about the DAPA/extended DACA ruling but at least they did this right. That was another stupid bullshit from Texas.
 

FyreWulff

Member
Just curious, because everyone is making it sound like there is a big reason why it's more harmful than beneficial: what is wrong with holding a clinic to "surgical" standards? Is that just ridiculous for what happens during the procedure or something?

1) You don't need full surgical standards to do it

2) A lot of the standards were bullshit like doors had to be a specific width, but doors aren't made to those widths because doors generally have a pretty standard width tiers (almost became an architect, so i'm a dork that can pretty much guess what a door is for by it's width ), so clinics would have to close over pure cosmetic reasons

tl;dr basically be suspicious every time the GOP pushes for an entire book of regulations, something they don't believe in, because suddenly it's okay for women's health.

And how would this scenario play out had Scalia been alive? And if Scalia were present to cast a vote, might this have even affected how Kennedy had voted? He's usually been quite hostile in regards to abortion rights. That's usually been the irony of Kennedy... that he's courteous to gays but quite indifferent to reproductive issues.

I think Kennedy is have a little bit of a "right side of history" tour going on, but technically it plays to his era of conservative views. It truly was overstepping of regulation.
 

FyreWulff

Member
just fyi, some of the 'surgical facility' requirements:

- it specified the exact tiles you had to use
- it required a certain number of parking spots (treatment facilities are always determined by bed capacity, not how many cars they can park)
- specific a specific size for the recovery rooms
- required bathrooms for each waiting room
- required clinics to install public pay phones inside






- regulated the angle the water comes out of the water fountain
 
Absolutely disgusting that states continue to effectively lie directly to their constituents about what legislation is and why it's being implemented. Beyond happy to see SCOTUS shoot that nonsense down.
 

Oblivion

Fetishing muscular manly men in skintight hosery
How is this even a case? Republicans have NEVER claimed to care about women's health when it came to abortion, and in fact, many have even argued that it doesn't matter what happens to the mother as long as the child can be saved. But now, all of a sudden, for as far as I can tell, literally the first time ever the argument being brought up from that side is that they're doing all these bullshit regulations on THEIR behalf? Seriously?

Not to mention the tiny problem with how closing down nearly every abortion clinic helps women any better at all?
 

Jeels

Member
just fyi, some of the 'surgical facility' requirements:

- it specified the exact tiles you had to use
- it required a certain number of parking spots (treatment facilities are always determined by bed capacity, not how many cars they can park)
- specific a specific size for the recovery rooms
- required bathrooms for each waiting room
- required clinics to install public pay phones inside






- regulated the angle the water comes out of the water fountain


Small government at work!
 
yeah this is actually a much bigger win than the 5-3 vote looks like. Both Alito and Roberts would have sent it back to the lower courts for clarifications and stuff. So really only Thomas was for the limits

Be careful thinking of it this way. Kennedy has changed his mind during the decision writing portion of an abortion case before, and it's entirely possible that the Alito/Roberts/Thomas dissent was written like that to try and draw Kennedy to their side, knowing that would induce a 4-4 split where the lower court's decision would remain.
 

Hazmat

Member
I was thrilled to wake up to this news this morning and I still can't really believe it. This is great news for Texas woman, and really for Texas in general.
 

captive

Joe Six-Pack: posting for the common man
just fyi, some of the 'surgical facility' requirements:

- it specified the exact tiles you had to use
- it required a certain number of parking spots (treatment facilities are always determined by bed capacity, not how many cars they can park)
- specific a specific size for the recovery rooms
- required bathrooms for each waiting room
- required clinics to install public pay phones inside






- regulated the angle the water comes out of the water fountain
do you have a link for this? Would love to share it.
 

HK-47

Oh, bitch bitch bitch.
even if you dislike Hillary, the chance for wholesale changes to abortion, LGBT, campaign finance, redistricting, etc that her presidency would usher in just because of a few supreme court seats is a-fucking-mazing

Dont forget clean energy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom