So, based on what the lawyer has told the media:
Cops were called by neighbour / complaint of underage drinking.
Cops arrive and gunfire is heard.
The kids hurriedly leave the party after hearing gunfire.
The kids are challenged by a cop while they are on foot and run to the car.
The kids reverse away from the cop that challenged them but there are two more cops at the end of the alleyway.
The cop that challenged them shoots into the car killing the front passenger.
The car does not stop at this point but stops a block later when the other kids realise the passenger is shot.
https://www.google.ca/amp/www.nydai...hoots-15-year-old-boy-party-article-1.3121142
Tragic.
Why wouldn't they cops use a car to block the alleyway? Why would a cop shoot in the direction of other cops?
It's understandable that the kids were scared and ran, even after being challenged while they were on foot. Hopefully the footage sheds some light on the situation.
Dallas News reported the vehicle had started driving towards officers in an aggressive manner when the officers opened fire.
Jordan Edwards was hit by a bullet fired through a passenger window
This sheds a bit more light but is still vague. When they were confronted, was it face to face or did the cop yell at them from a distance? Did they even hear or see the cop? Did the cop see them clearly? What did the cop communicate? If the cops were called because of a house party, where's the racial component?
Like I said, all of this screams of incompetence rather than profiling. What the fuck was the cop thinking when they decided to shoot at a fleeing vehicle full of teenagers.
Does passenger window mean side window (not windshield)?
Considering I've never in my life heard of part of a windshield referred to as either a passenger or driver side window, I'm going with side window for now.
seriously what's the point to shoot at a moving car? If they planned to run you over (which i doubt), even if you kill the driver, it doesn't mean the car stops...
and even then, the other in the car are still there and innocent (not that the driver was not innocent) and you still shoot like you're in a goddamn videogame
fucking incompetent bastard
because a vast majority of white people are taught from a very early age that:
Cops are to be trusted
Cops are here to help us if we need them
Cops an authority figure and thus you do what they say when they say (Read: if they say jump you say how high)
throw in a little black on the victim(everyone is at least a little racist), it happened at 11pm (nothing good ever happens after X time) and the no angel defense its all very effective for creating sympathy for cops.
I could be wrong, but my guess is that shooting at tires is also a no-no because if you miss and hit the road at an angle, you have a good chance at a richocet. But I dunno.why not shoot the tires? Or is that not allowed for some reason?
I'm actually entering a law enforcement related field shortly and will learn firearms material for the position. Will be interested to see what the training states. That said, not in America so it may be different.
Fact that none of the kids were charged with anything instantly debunks the bullshit "driving in an aggressive manner" thing.
How is it clear? For one, seeing kids at night from a distance does not mean he knew whether or not they were black. Even in daytime, it could have been unclear depending on the distance and what the kids are wearing. And even if the cop did know the kids were black, it's far from "clear" that the shooting was racially motivated. I'm not denying there's a systemic issue of racial profiling with our cops but in this specific instance, there's not enough evidence as of yet to point to racism as a cause for the shooting. The officer could be the biggest piece of racist shit on the planet but the events don't point to that being the reason he shot. What it does indicate is that there was no reason to open fire and the officer had an itchy trigger finger. That alone is enough reason to be outraged without assuming this is solely due to racism.Dude,if the cop saw the kids go to the car it makes it a clearer case of profiling, because he would have seen they are black...
Same bullshit. Firing into a car should be illegal unless the people in the car are shooting at you. Too many times, these 'brave' pussies throw themselves into the path to justify firing their weapons.
If you are brave and courageous, stand before a jury and don't hide behind a blue wall.
This is a pretty good if what we're being told is the truth.
Anyway we need to change the our cop hating culture, this tragedy wouldn't have happened if they didn't try to run. They weren't involved in underaged drinking so they didn't even need to run.
Kid doesn't even look 15, Jesus
How is it clear? For one, seeing kids at night from a distance does not mean he knew whether or not they were black. Even in daytime, it could have been unclear depending on the distance and what the kids are wearing. And even if the cop did know the kids were black, it's far from "clear" that the shooting was racially motivated. I'm not denying there's a systemic issue of racial profiling with our cops but in this specific instance, there's not enough evidence as of yet to point to racism as a cause for the shooting. The officer could be the biggest piece of racist shit on the planet but the events don't point to that being the reason he shot. What it does indicate is that there was no reason to open fire and the officer had an itchy trigger finger. That alone is enough reason to be outraged without assuming this is solely due to racism.
This is very true. People taking about 'making it about race' are usually scared to address the true issues. The 60's sure did make people scared. What are they scared of? Open, honest discussion? Lie, what really happens if we make it about race? Does someone die if we make it about race? It's there a kidnapping or assault? Are taxes raised if we make everything about race?Earlier in this thread, you said people were "trying to make this about race." People are refuting your dismissal of the significance of the teens' skin color because at some point, the skin color of the victim affects the course of events invariably. If it doesn't prompt the 911 caller to make the call in the first place, it makes the police assume the worst upon hearing/seeing the soon-to-be victims' skin color. If the police aren't aware of the race of the victims, then the existing perpetuated stereotypes of black and brown people are used to help justify the killings. If the killings can't be justified, then racist police supporters will still harass the family of the victim, directly or indirectly. If the killer cop is actually brought to justice, this becomes an anomaly relative to the norm because of the victims' skin color.
No one has to try to "make it about race" in the country the shooting occurred in. At some point, race becomes a part of it without anyone trying to force it into the discussion.
You can't dismiss the existence of racism and the grossly disproportionate killings of black and brown people in the U.S. by police; you cannot. In turn, you accomplish nothing by going out of your way to assert that this event has nothing to do with racewe have all been born into a world where race has been made to matter and ignoring that change and nothing. You are wasting everyone's time trying to rewrite the contextrace always matters in these situations.
So not only did they kill an innocent person by firing recklessly into a vehicle, they never found out who was shooting at the party. Really shitty policework here.So, based on what the lawyer has told the media:
Cops were called by neighbour / complaint of underage drinking.
Cops arrive and gunfire is heard.
The kids hurriedly leave the party after hearing gunfire.
The kids are challenged by a cop while they are on foot and run to the car.
The kids reverse away from the cop that challenged them but there are two more cops at the end of the alleyway.
The cop that challenged them shoots into the car killing the front passenger.
The car does not stop at this point but stops a block later when the other kids realise the passenger is shot.
https://www.google.ca/amp/www.nydai...hoots-15-year-old-boy-party-article-1.3121142
Tragic.
Why wouldn't they cops use a car to block the alleyway? Why would a cop shoot in the direction of other cops?
It's understandable that the kids were scared and ran, even after being challenged while they were on foot. Hopefully the footage sheds some light on the situation.
Show me where I did the bolded. If we want to shift the discussion to racial inequality in the criminal justice system, we certainly can, but that's a completely different discussion. Of course race will play a role from the very beginning but that does not mean the actual shooting was motivated primarily by race as many are asserting without evidence. People are already condemning this as such when we have no solid evidence pointing us in that direction. We don't even know if the dispatcher was told what race the these kids were. The police get called about house parties all the time! Maybe new evidence will surface but you can't try to prosecute based on discrimination for all cases of police misconduct simply because the victim is a minority. That's a great way to let cops walk away without penalty for gross misconduct.Earlier in this thread, you said people were "trying to make this about race." People are refuting your dismissal of the significance of the teens' skin color because at some point, the skin color of the victim affects the course of events invariably. If it doesn't prompt the 911 caller to make the call in the first place, it makes the police assume the worst upon hearing/seeing the soon-to-be victims' skin color. If the police aren't aware of the race of the victims, then the existing perpetuated stereotypes of black and brown people are used to help justify the killings. If the killings can't be justified, then racist police supporters will still harass the family of the victim, directly or indirectly. If the killer cop is actually brought to justice, this becomes an anomaly relative to the norm because of the victims' skin color.
No one has to try to "make it about race" in the country the shooting occurred in. At some point, race becomes a part of it without anyone trying to force it into the discussion.
You can't dismiss the existence of racism and the grossly disproportionate killings of black and brown people in the U.S. by police; you cannot. In turn, you accomplish nothing by going out of your way to assert that this event has nothing to do with racewe have all been born into a world where race has been made to matter and ignoring that change and nothing. You are wasting everyone's time trying to rewrite the contextrace always matters in these situations.
Guilty people get off free if you charge them and can't prove guilt. The public also becomes disillusioned if every case involving a minority is suddenly a case of discrimination when there's no evidence to support such an accusation. As much as it pains you, making every case about race actually does have tangible harmful effects.Can someone tell me what the fuck actually happens if we make everything about race? A cat dies or an angel doesn't get their wings?
Yeah, I'm not sure how the cops could've known the ethnicity of the van's passengers given the time and the van driving in reverse (presumably toward the police vehicle).Wasn't the car driving in reverse at night?
Guilty people get off free if you charge them and can't prove guilt. The public also becomes disillusioned if every case involving a minority is suddenly a case of discrimination when there's no evidence to support such an accusation. As much as it pains you, making every case about race actually does have tangible harmful effects.
Guilty people get off free if you charge them and can't prove guilt. The public also becomes disillusioned if every case involving a minority is suddenly a case of discrimination when there's no evidence to support such an accusation. As much as it pains you, making every case about race actually does have tangible harmful effects.
Just another day in the good ol US of A.
Seriously, fuck your police force down there. Bunch of incompetent fucks.
RIP little guy.
The actual conviction rate for hate crime cases since 2010 is about 10%. More than half of cases are turned down due to lack of evidence. Pursuing hate crime charges without strong evidence is a waste of time and resources.I'm not sure if you have any evidence to support anything you said here.
SHOOT THE TIRES OUT
Policemen are the only group in America that can legally get away with murder.
Let that sink in a bit.
I was having this convo with a friend of mine and it is drastically different in canada, in my city there was a lady doing some type of stunt/staement downtown she wore one of those glass doll masks and held a gun up and pointed it to herself and people, in the end it was a real gun no loaded but a cop went out of his way and tackled her to the ground instead of shooting or even tazing her
See title.
Think: Bet it was a black child.
Check thread.
Yup.
Cop is a coward and hopefully justice will be served upon him. I'm not confident in that however.
Show me where I did the bolded.
So? This thread isn't a court of law, people acknowledging that race plays a part in these killings aren't sentencing the officer to death.Of course race will play a role from the very beginning but that does not mean the actual shooting was motivated primarily by race as many are asserting without evidence.