I'm going to settle this Birdman/Boyhood debate once and for all:
Nightcrawler was better than both of them.
This one's even better.
Whiplash, too, was better.I'm going to settle this Birdman/Boyhood debate once and for all:
Nightcrawler was better than both of them.
Surprised American Sniper got shat over. Kinda what happened to Lincoln, but even worse.
I'm glad J.K. Simmons got an oscar for Whiplash but what about the main star of the movie? Not even a nomination. I thought he was brilliant.
How did Neil Patrick Harris do?
And speaking of Mexican media overreacting:
They are comparing winning Best Movie to winning a World Cup. I'm cool that Iñárritu won it, but talk about latching to someone else's success.
IMO Birdman deserves the best movie oscar more than Boyhood but both of those are far worse when compared to Nightcrawler.
Poor Jake at least deserves one oscar for best actor. He is never going to get an oscar nomination if a role like that will not even win.
J.K. Simmons winning an oscar for best supporting roll is well deserved, though.
The Best Actor category was way too competitive this year. People like Gylenhaal and David Oyelowo didn't even get a nod.
Which is kinda baffling since Bradley Cooper made it in.
And speaking of Mexican media overreacting:
They are comparing winning Best Movie to winning a World Cup. I'm cool that Iñárritu won it, but talk about latching to someone else's success.
While I thought Redmayne and Jones (who was even better) were the two best things about the Theory of Everything, it just goes to show the easiest way to a best acting oscar is still to ape a well known real life figure.
It was pretty bad, terrible writing. Another thing though is that, more than ever, the audience is so uptight. I know, surprise surprise, Hollywood is full of oversensitive people who can't laugh at themselves or anything else even remotely controversial, but it feels like its worse than ever. It's like they just sit there and murmur and gasp anytime anyone dares to say anything a little out of line. The show is more and more of a drag to watch, and I think it makes hosting nearly impossible since the audience basically gives you nothing.How did Neil Patrick Harris do?
You know that's the Latin American way. ALWAYS latch on to the success of your countrymen as if they were always representing your nation. :lol
Shirley Temple didn't make the tribute... that's... wow.
Shirley Temple didn't make the tribute... that's... wow.
Keaton was robbed.
I'm glad J.K. Simmons got an oscar for Whiplash but what about the main star of the movie? Not even a nomination. I thought he was brilliant.
It was a very standard ceremony. Three of my favourites from last year; Gone Girl, Nightcrawler and Interstellar were all shafted anyway.
When your "gimmick" is a crazy film style with long extended shots artfully executed over an awesome bombastic all-percussion score, I think you can call it what it is. A great film. The story was intriguing, surrealist, and entertaining.
Boyhood's "gimmick" existed completely outside the actual art of film-making. It was a run-of-the-mill coming of age story that fizzled out around 90 minutes into the film. It was shot consistently in the same boring style. It's story was "nothing matters," just like Birdman utilized those themes, except Birdman was actually interesting and daring.
Boyhood's risk and art is a business and scheduling feat wrapped around an average plot. It's a okay to good film. I don't believe it deserved to win, but that's my opinion.
People are free to disagree.
The point of Boyhood is not "nothing matters", it's the exact opposite: everything matters. Every moment, no matter how small or trivial or seemingly insignificant, has meaning.
Had Boyhood's story been about how nothing matters, I'm sure Linklater would have chosen a much easier production method.
My favorite part of Boyhood is when she divorces the third husband. I thought he was still around, but the film was so much of an afterthought to the filmmakers you're supposed to assume a rough day with a beer on the porch means divorce.
Yeah, I had no idea what was going on. Both my girlfriend and I were confused by that. In one scene he's harping on Mason for being late and talking about it being his home and then a couple of scenes later she's selling the home.
They mention the divorce as an afterthought.
The film had a lot of problems. I liked it but I do not think it deserved to be there.
And speaking of Mexican media overreacting:
They are comparing winning Best Movie to winning a World Cup. I'm cool that Iñárritu won it, but talk about latching to someone else's success.
My favorite part of Boyhood was the ridiculous scene of the stepfather bobbing in and out of traffic while drunk, I laughed heartly at that scene, in fact that whole storyline of that stepfather was extremely poorly done.
What was poorly done about it?
I suppose the acting was the main problem with that storyline, it just wasn't strong enough by any of the actors to present it self as natural within the rest of the film. It was the first part of the film that tried to show much more depth of the characters and I think it failed.What was poorly done about it?
I suppose the acting was the main problem with that storyline, it just wasn't strong enough by any of the actors to present it self as natural within the rest of the film. It was the first part of the film that tried to show much more depth of the characters and I think it failed.
I completely forgot Patricia was even nominated for her performance in the film till she won.
That like most scenes in the film felt like stuffs kids that age would talk and bullshit about but watched like the actors were reading off cue cards. I mean the dialogue was not great writing either but I didn't find any of the movie to have great dialogue.The worst scene in Boyhood, by far, is the teens talking about women and beer in that unfinished house. It was laughably bad.
I'm not just talking about the kid who played Mason not bbeing a strong enough actor to bring any realism to those scenes, the mom and the stepfather as well.I actually thought the actor playing Mason was doing a pretty good job of being a teen at that age. I don't know how much of that was acting though.
My favorite part of Boyhood is when she divorces the third husband. I thought he was still around, but the film was so much of an afterthought to the filmmakers you're supposed to assume a rough day with a beer on the porch means divorce.
It's almost like he turned out to be another mean drunk or something.
Also, they never showed us when Mason got his ears pierced. Plot hole!!
Its mediotiempo.com, a sports medium, obviously they would compare the win with something related to sport (i mean...http://www.mediotiempo.com/bitacora.php?id_partido=1 haha) , you're being manipulative, most of the media are taking normally the victory of Inarritu and Chivo Lubeski:
http://www.elnorte.com/aplicaciones.../aplicaciones/articulo/default.aspx?id=472053
http://www.milenio.com/hey/cine/Hacen-historia-Oscar_0_469753032.html
http://www.eluniversal.com/arte-y-e...alez-inarritu-gano-el-oscar-como-mejor-pelicu
http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2015/02/23/sociedad/043n1soc