The Amount of Hillary Hate Scares Me

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is patently false. I'm mildly supportive of Bernie (which is more than I can say of any other candidate in the past decade), but I actively dislike Hillary. When she's the nominee, I will not vote for her on election day. Yeah, she's better than any Republican alternative, but a single vote matters naught anyway, so I'd not vote for her out of principle (the same way I would vote for Bernie out of principle)

This is the problem with the Democratic party.
 

hawk2025

Member
This is patently false. I'm mildly supportive of Bernie (which is more than I can say of any other candidate in the past decade), but I actively dislike Hillary. When she's the nominee, I will not vote for her on election day. Yeah, she's better than any Republican alternative, but a single vote matters naught anyway, so I'd not vote for her out of principle (the same way I would vote for Bernie out of principle)


Congrats -- your principles have the potential to shit on people's real, relevant, struggling rights.
 
This is patently false. I'm mildly supportive of Bernie (which is more than I can say of any other candidate in the past decade), but I actively dislike Hillary. When she's the nominee, I will not vote for her on election day. Yeah, she's better than any Republican alternative, but a single vote matters naught anyway, so I'd not vote for her out of principle (the same way I would vote for Bernie out of principle)

No, a single vote absolutely matters. That's your voice, that's your civic duty in the process.

Again, this is Sanders talking:

In America, we should be celebrating our democracy and doing everything possible to make it easier for people to participate in the political process. Election Day should be a national holiday so that everyone has the time and opportunity to vote. While this would not be a cure-all, it would indicate a national commitment to create a more vibrant democracy.

We should not be satisfied with a "democracy" in which more than 60 percent of our people don't vote and some 80 percent of young people and low-income Americans fail to vote. We can and must do better than that.

Vote. Dear God, even voting Green is better than nothing.
 
He will appoint judges that will render Bernie's agenda dead. And not just for 2016. Corporate money becomes enshrined into our process; Citizens United stands for decades. The Voting Rights Act stays dead. Marriage equality goes on shaky legal ground via "religious freedom" bills. Corporations remain legal persons.

This does not poison the well of progressivism for just the next 4 years. This is for decades.

And - not shockingly - no one has countered this.
Most of this happens even if Hillary is president, IMO

But yes, it would be worse with a Republican.

No, a single vote absolutely matters. That's your voice, that's your civic duty in the process.

Again, this is Sanders talking:



Vote. Dear God, even voting Green is better than nothing.
.

At least vote for your local people and house/senate, folks. Write in a protest vote for the presidency if you must.
 

NeoXChaos

Member
This is patently false. I'm mildly supportive of Bernie (which is more than I can say of any other candidate in the past decade), but I actively dislike Hillary. When she's the nominee, I will not vote for her on election day. Yeah, she's better than any Republican alternative, but a single vote matters naught anyway, so I'd not vote for her out of principle (the same way I would vote for Bernie out of principle)

vote.
 

Sobriquet

Member
Senator Clinton loves trade deals

Candidate Clinton hates trade deals

This pattern happened with NAFTA and it repeated TPP

Who know what stance President Clinton will take.

Uh... Hillary was First Lady when NAFTA went through.

Most of this happens even if Hillary is president, IMO

But yes, it would be worse with a Republican.

None of that will happen if Hillary is President. All of that will happen if a Republican is elected. Not sure about Trump though.
 
Most of this happens even if Hillary is president, IMO

But yes, it would be worse with a Republican.

None of this happens if Hillary is President.

Please. Look up Citizens United. Please. Take a look at the person the group was trying to prevent from becoming President. Hint: her name rhymes with Tillary Hinton.

As to the topic, Hillary has dealt with shit for the last twenty years. She's been vilified for her hair, daring to have ambitions as a First Lady more important than trading cookie recipes, for taking up legislation to reform health care. She's been smeared and slandered. And guess what?

She's still standing. She can take the shit that is heaped her way and she can do it with dignity. It's going to take a lot more than some fervent Reddit posters to take her down. If the GOP couldn't do it after twenty years, it's just not going to happen.
 
This is patently false. I'm mildly supportive of Bernie (which is more than I can say of any other candidate in the past decade), but I actively dislike Hillary. When she's the nominee, I will not vote for her on election day. Yeah, she's better than any Republican alternative, but a single vote matters naught anyway, so I'd not vote for her out of principle (the same way I would vote for Bernie out of principle)
Just remember that's what conservatives want you to do. Not voting makes their vote matter more.
 

Tabris

Member
Come on people, Hillary will definitely pass TPP. Her donors want it. She'll have a talk track about it being too far along the process / losing trade to China / etc.
 
This is patently false. I'm mildly supportive of Bernie (which is more than I can say of any other candidate in the past decade), but I actively dislike Hillary. When she's the nominee, I will not vote for her on election day. Yeah, she's better than any Republican alternative, but a single vote matters naught anyway, so I'd not vote for her out of principle (the same way I would vote for Bernie out of principle)
And this is the kind of mentality I'm referring to in making this thread.
 

pigeon

Banned
Both the far left and far right didn't like it because it was more of a corporatist thing. The point of it was to benefit big business because it lowered trade barriers.

Lowered trade barriers benefit every American.

Lowered trade barriers are how we got the iPhone.

Lowered trade barriers are part of why you have a computer to make this post at all.

The kneejerk ideological hatred of free trade on the left recently is pretty disheartening. Lowering the global standard of living is not the right way to move towards socialism. It's actually the opposite.
 

Hylian7

Member
I'm a Bernie supporter too, and don't particularly care for Hilary, but I don't hate her. If she gets the nomination, I will vote for her as she is far better than those other assholes.

I really hope Bernie gets the nomination though.
 
She's been pretty consistent with her views for the last 20+ years. Of course there are some outliers. I've been hearing that she's untrustworthy from the Republicans for as many years. Now liberals are using it as well.

Partly correct. She was consistent in her views for most of the period after Bill's Presidency until 2012/2013 or so, when many of them suddenly reversed.

She is notable for not supporting gay marriage until as late as 2013. The exact timing of her flip on this is not really known.

She has long supported free trade agreements until 2012 when she flipped on TPP.

She voted for invasion of Iraq and then reversed her position on that. We all know this. It's amazing that John Kerry couldn't get away with this in 2004 but everyone's giving Hillary a free pass on this in 2016.

And Obama did not vote against the Iraq invasion because he couldn't. He wasn't a Senator yet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXzmXy226po
Obama opposing the invasion of Iraq in 2002, before he was a Senator. He says clearly he would have voted against it.
 
This is patently false. I'm mildly supportive of Bernie (which is more than I can say of any other candidate in the past decade), but I actively dislike Hillary. When she's the nominee, I will not vote for her on election day. Yeah, she's better than any Republican alternative, but a single vote matters naught anyway, so I'd not vote for her out of principle (the same way I would vote for Bernie out of principle)
What would Bernie do?
 
I personally don't have an issue choosing Clinton over Trump since the latter is obviously going to bury this country. I just don't like that she will likely get the nom again in 2020 and set up what amounts to a clinton/bush revolving door for the past 30 years broken up by Obama. It just leaves me uninspired to really give a shit about the presidential election. I'll still be voting down ticket but living in NYS the presidential election has already been decided for the democrats.

However, If I did live in a red state I would obviously swallow my pride and feelings and do my part to keep a republican out of the white house, especially Trump. Since I don't, I can just vote down ticket and try to swing the rest of the government back to somewhere near sanity.
 
Even I know at this point that if bernie gets the nom its over. He will get smeared as an atheist socialist that wants to being communism.

Hillary has to be the one, even if you dont like it.
 

Tesseract

Banned
There is a much bigger chance that Bernie fans will not vote at all, than vote for Trump just to spite Hillary.

Those largely being young voters, who do not have a great record of actually turning up. Hillary's own baggage wont make it easy to energize that crowd. I cannot think of a politican in the west with more baggage than Hillary has accumulated. But i dont expect them to turn up and then vote Trump in any significant numbers.

Its very difficult to win another election after 8 years, the "grass is greener" effect will always be there and difficult to maneuver around. A lot of people simply arent happy and some are out right angry, to tell them to just take another 4 years of the same is a hard pill to swallow, no matter how much you hate Republicans, Trump etc.

Donald is going to eat a lot of Bernie supporters, there's no way around that. He's an unbought man who singlehandidly both won the republican primary and rekt the GOP forever. Young people eat that shit up. He's gonna pivot center with a sickly strange graceful trumpet of big new Yorker style beatdowns. No bought institution, person will be safe.

punished donald dumpter, a tremendous fusion of fdr and and lbj and raegan and vegeta and Jed from the West wing starring Martin sheen as Jed let Trump be trump
 

ThisGuy

Member
This is patently false. I'm mildly supportive of Bernie (which is more than I can say of any other candidate in the past decade), but I actively dislike Hillary. When she's the nominee, I will not vote for her on election day. Yeah, she's better than any Republican alternative, but a single vote matters naught anyway, so I'd not vote for her out of principle (the same way I would vote for Bernie out of principle)
What about gays getting married? Or turned away from business? What about progress with police brutality against blacks? It's been my experience that repubs are team blue wall. What about immigrants? What about the poor? What about women's rights? Foreign policy? Refugees?

What about them? The democrats, Hillary included, may not do the best job, but what kind of job do you think the Republicans will do? One vote may not matter but you're not alone in feeling this way. Your issues matter too, but if yours are not met maybe consider the issues of others, your vote will directly help them. Maybe consider it.
 

Russ T

Banned
Hillary is what is wrong with American politics. I also think Obama was weak too. You've had weak politicians bowing down to big money interests for the last 3 decades in the US. Which has led to the decline of your country for the average citizen.

One day I hope to have my southern brothers join the rest of the modern western world in our "socialist" quality of life. But it won't be through someone like Hillary.

If your income is above the median income in the US (and in a safe position not susceptible to ebb and flow of deregulated Wall Street) and you're selfish by not caring for the rest of your fellow Americans - ignore everything I just said because your lifestyle is great and Hillary is a great choice for you.

This post nails it.

She's not as bad as the GOP, not as bad as Trump, Cruz, Rubio... but she's still bad. EDIT: To clarify, she's, like, way way way way way better than anyone in the other party. At the very worst, she's status quo, rather than outright hurtful like those guys.
 
I personally don't have an issue choosing Clinton over Trump since the latter is obviously going to bury this country. I just don't like that she will likely get the nom again in 2020 and set up what amounts to a clinton/bush revolving door for the past 30 years broken up by Obama. It just leaves me uninspired to really give a shit about the presidential election. I'll still be voting down ticket but living in NYS the presidential election has already been decided for the democrats.

However, If I did live in a red state I would obviously swallow my pride and feelings and do my part to keep a republican out of the white house, especially Trump. Since I don't, I can just vote down ticket and try to swing the rest of the government back to somewhere near sanity.

giphy.gif


Yes, vote in your state and local elections! VOTE!
 

Cindro

Member
I've actually been going back and forth with a friend over this very issue.

Trump's path to the nomination has already emboldened all these latent racists and I feel that him winning would only validate them. That might not be a problem for your heterosexual white male voter, but for other like myself it's a big deal. The difference between Hilary and Trump is that Trump is trying to pass legislation banning Muslims from entering the country. Hilary is not. Trump is trying to push the idea that brown people are either illegal immigrants or terrorists. Hilary is not. By not voting and someone like Trump wins, I feel you are indirectly responsible for the outcome.

I'm voting for Bernie Sanders in the primaries, but if Hilary gets the nomination my vote is absolutely going to her.

These kinda Sanders voters couldn't possibly give a fuck about anyone who's being targeted by the rhetoric on the right. They just want to see their guy win. Children.

Let's not even talk about the ones who say they'll just vote for Trump if Bernie doesn't win. Boggles my mind.

This is the problem with the Democratic party.

Congrats -- your principles have the potential to shit on people's real, relevant, struggling rights.
These arguments are just the worst.

Have any of you bought an Apple product, even a single song on iTunes? Congrats, you've contributed to the suicide of workers in Apple's unethical overseas factories!

Do any of you ever shop at Walmart? Wow, how terrible of you - you must adamantly strive to oppress minimum wage workers!

Have any of you ever driven a car? Jee, your actions have shit on the health of our planet!

I honestly don't even know how to take these posts seriously - if I had the power control America, of course I'd do everything I could to make it as fair and as comfortable for all. But I never will, and pretending my single vote for Hillary in November (in a state that is always Blue no matter what anyway) will "hep the cause" in any perceptible way that is above statistical zero is the most laughably asinine thing I've read in a long time.
 
What about gays getting married? Or turned away from business? What about progress with police brutality against blacks? It's been my experience that repubs are team blue wall. What about immigrants? What about the poor? What about women's rights? Foreign policy? Refugees?

What about them? The democrats, Hillary included, may not do the best job, but what kind of job do you think the Republicans will do? One vote may not matter but you're not alone in feeling this way. Your issues matter too, but if yours are not met maybe consider the issues of others, your vote will directly help them. Maybe consider it.
FUCK YOU, I GOT MINE™
 
They didn't accept anything. These are the current options presented. You can't make up new candidates out of nowhere. For a socially progressive President, you have either Sanders or Clinton. That's it.

I'm unsure what magic wand you wish to wave to make a new candidate appear at this point in the process.

If Sanders loses, I'll vote for Clinton, because in the end, the GOP candidates are appalling and will do their best to take away the rights of the folks I highlighted before.

Again, it comes down to polling. The Democratic Party wouldn't support Hillary if she was polling at 10%. They also wouldn't support similar Hillary style candidates in the future if she lost in the general election with 30% of the vote. So you enable such candidates by doing the "lesser of two evil" approach bc it prevents the bottom from falling out of her numbers. Yeah, it's probably too late in this cycle, but what about future election cycles?

My position is that "these are the current options presented", in your words, because of the "lesser of two evils" mindset.
 
I personally don't have an issue choosing Clinton over Trump since the latter is obviously going to bury this country. I just don't like that she will likely get the nom again in 2020 and set up what amounts to a clinton/bush revolving door for the past 30 years broken up by Obama. It just leaves me uninspired to really give a shit about the presidential election. I'll still be voting down ticket but living in NYS the presidential election has already been decided for the democrats.

However, If I did live in a red state I would obviously swallow my pride and feelings and do my part to keep a republican out of the white house, especially Trump. Since I don't, I can just vote down ticket and try to swing the rest of the government back to somewhere near sanity.

Please do.

And that goes for everyone here. Even if you maintain your position not to vote for either the Democratic or Republican nominees this fall, I encourage every American of voting age here to vote downticket nonetheless. Vote local.
 

Dice

Pokémon Parentage Conspiracy Theorist
Me if America chooses Trump or Establishment

On the one hand, I'm amazed at the pessimism Hillary supporters have at what could be done if we all actually went by our principles rather than trying to game theory tiny wins. On the other hand, I'm amazed at the optimism with which Hillary voters seem to have in regard to our country and the world holding on okay with more of the status quo trajectory. I don't believe she would make even a little progress, I believe the engines of destruction in establishment politics have us running headlong into a wreck so fast that it completely outpaces anything she is trying to settle for. I see me and the country and world getting fucked in some measure by her or Trump. We're simply out of time to be dicking around with this lesser of two evils bullshit. It isn't about taking the necessary hit, it's about getting the fuck out of the way of the oncoming train. If America wants to settle for that because they are too scared to even try for what is right, then that's it.

As for trying to put blame on persons such as myself in the outcome of a Trump win, I find that completely ridiculous. If committed reform voters can be blamed for a Trump victory because they didn't settle for establishment, the people who voted establishment when they would have preferred reform simply because they had no faith in reform succeeding can be blamed for making the reform option so weak.

If you're going to try that game theory bullshit there are two realities you also need to reconcile to the situation. First, you accept the fact Trump voters are absolutely not backing down from anti-establishment and choose to adjust your vote accordingly, but then you see Bernie supporters likewise absolutely not backing down from their anti-establishment stance and don't adjust for them but instead blame them? That makes no sense.

Second, Trump could be seen as locking in to destruction, or he can be seen merely as a disruption. Remember how there was a huge backlash in the midterms toward GOP that blocked up many of Obama's motions? That can swing right back if people are so horrified with Trump, and that could likewise give momentum to a stronger reform movement. Would this accelerationism work? Who the fuck knows! That's why game theory is bullshit and you should vote for what is right. But if you're going to be all about game theory you need to acknowledge how Trump could be more effective for accelerating reform than sticking with the deathly slow establishment method.

Vote. Dear God, even voting Green is better than nothing.
That's what I'm doing if Bernie is out.
 
Yes, vote in your state and local elections! VOTE!

I made sure this last November that everyone in my house had voted. We managed to get rid of a local shitlord running for DA that had no business running in the first place let alone be in politics as long as she had. Felt really great. Suffolk county almost had a few close calls but eventually stuck with their incumbents. At least Nassau county is starting to wake up to the bullshit and lies.
 
I personally don't have an issue choosing Clinton over Trump since the latter is obviously going to bury this country. I just don't like that she will likely get the nom again in 2020 and set up what amounts to a clinton/bush revolving door for the past 30 years broken up by Obama. It just leaves me uninspired to really give a shit about the presidential election. I'll still be voting down ticket but living in NYS the presidential election has already been decided for the democrats.

However, If I did live in a red state I would obviously swallow my pride and feelings and do my part to keep a republican out of the white house, especially Trump. Since I don't, I can just vote down ticket and try to swing the rest of the government back to somewhere near sanity.

On the bright side of the bolded, it's almost certainly going to finally end in 2024 - Chelsea doesn't seem to have aspirations for the office and the Bushes' last chance was a big, fat mess just dropped out.

But yeah, in places like NYS you're definitely well in the right to only vote downticket, imo - the City's gonna clinch the presidential election by itself, so you might as well make your vote matter in other ways.
 
On the bright side of the bolded, it's almost certainly going to finally end in 2024 - Chelsea doesn't seem to have aspirations for the office and the Bushes' last chance was a big, fat mess just dropped out.

But yeah, in places like NYS you're definitely well in the right to only vote downticket, imo

Still got George P. Bush around. I bet he'll run in the 2020s.
 
I don't hate Hillary, but I sure as Hell don't trust her.
I'd much rather have her than any GOP candidate though, but I'd take a lump of coal over any GOP candidate.
 

Suite Pee

Willing to learn
I figure most of the Hillary hate will be overcome by terror at the thought of having Trump as president.

*visits post year later, cries*
 
You can't be serious about wanting to change the country if your ideals begin and end with voting for a president. Get this: You are always going to have to choose between the lesser of two evils when it comes to that. No candidate is going to be perfect, no one candidate is always going to promote and be for all of your ideals. I recommend picking one or the other because the alternative could be a lot worse but that's entirely up to you.

What actually changes things is voting locally. Vote for a governor that shares your vision, vote for a representative that wants to change your area for the better, vote for the mayor that has a plan to keep your city growing. Living or dying on the president makes you look politically ignorant and will only make you unhappier in the end.

Changing the country at a federal level is SUPER HARD. It's much less so locally.
 
To the OP, take solace in this.

We heard a lot of the same sort of rhetoric from Clinton supporters in 2008. "Obama won't get the female vote! They'll stay home or write in Hillary's name! Vote Hillary!"

When she lost the nomination and she went all in on endorsing Obama and campaigning for him, what happened? Obama won the female vote in the general.

I don't doubt that Sanders when Clinton inevitably wins (which I think is safe to say now) will do everything he can to get his supporters out to vote for Clinton... and I don't doubt that the vast majority of his supporters will do just that.
 

Cindro

Member
No, a single vote absolutely matters. That's your voice, that's your civic duty in the process.

Again, this is Sanders talking:



Vote. Dear God, even voting Green is better than nothing.
Voting green is better than nothing? Voting green would be just as ineffective for Hillary, which seems to be the whole point of this thread. Of course Sanders wants to encourage the importance of a vote - that doesn't mean that in actual reality there's any reason to do so other than for symbolic reasons.


Just remember that's what conservatives want you to do. Not voting makes their vote matter more.
I assure you, the delegates from my state will not be tied in a deadlock with my vote as the deciding factor.

What about gays getting married? Or turned away from business? What about progress with police brutality against blacks? It's been my experience that repubs are team blue wall. What about immigrants? What about the poor? What about women's rights? Foreign policy? Refugees?

What about them? The democrats, Hillary included, may not do the best job, but what kind of job do you think the Republicans will do? One vote may not matter but you're not alone in feeling this way. Your issues matter too, but if yours are not met maybe consider the issues of others, your vote will directly help them. Maybe consider it.
All causes I obviously feel strongly about. But I can make far more of a difference on those issues in my personal life, just by having conversations with people about them, than I ever could by voting for Hillary.
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
This is patently false. I'm mildly supportive of Bernie (which is more than I can say of any other candidate in the past decade), but I actively dislike Hillary. When she's the nominee, I will not vote for her on election day. Yeah, she's better than any Republican alternative, but a single vote matters naught anyway, so I'd not vote for her out of principle (the same way I would vote for Bernie out of principle)

To not vote is an active decision to not have your opinion heard.

If you actually think your vote doesn't matter, why would you vote for Bernie? No one gives a shit about your principles in the end--only your vote matters. And it does matter.
 
Voting green is better than nothing? Voting green would be just as ineffective for Hillary, which seems to be the whole point of this thread. Of course Sanders wants to encourage the importance of a vote - that doesn't mean that in actual reality there's any reason to do so other than for symbolic reasons.

Voting Green for president as long as it gets you to the polls and voting for state and local elections while you're there is at least better than not voting at all.
 
Voting green is better than nothing? Voting green would be just as ineffective for Hillary, which seems to be the whole point of this thread. Of course Sanders wants to encourage the importance of a vote - that doesn't mean that in actual reality there's any reason to do so other than for symbolic reasons.




I assure you, the delegates from my state will not be tied in a deadlock with my vote as the deciding factor.


All causes I obviously feel strongly about. But I can make far more of a difference on those issues in my personal life, just by having conversations with people about them, than I ever could by voting for Hillary.

That same sort of mentality is responsible for people under 30 being really under represented. Because enough of them think voting is pointless. If they start turning out in large numbers and become a sought after voting block, you would see way more politicians targeting the under 30s with policies that appeal to them.

That's how it works. If you're vindictive or fickle with your vote or you never bother voting... you'll never get representation.

And you aren't going to change the system from the top down. As others have said, vote in every election you can, from the town elections up to the presidential ones.
 
He will appoint judges that will render Bernie's agenda dead. And not just for 2016. Corporate money becomes enshrined into our process; Citizens United stands for decades. The Voting Rights Act stays dead. Marriage equality goes on shaky legal ground via "religious freedom" bills. Corporations remain legal persons.

This does not poison the well of progressivism for just the next 4 years. This is for decades.

And - not shockingly - no one has countered this.

It's clear that a great many people have (and elsewhere) no clue how the US political system works. The Supreme Court has the power to overturn legislative acts and yet people here are arguing we should just let the Republicans have this election because it'll somehow lead to some fantasy progressive president getting in office and magically fixing everything. Never mind they'd likely be faced with a 6-3 conservative majority on the Supreme Court. Never mind that the president can only sign legislation if Congress passes it. Never mind the power held by state governments. Too many people believe the president will fix everything and anything that happens that doesn't live up to our ideals is the president's fault. Just look at the people blaming Obama for the US not having single payer healthcare.
 
Ok. Hillary scares me. Hillary supporters scare me. I believe she is a complete fake. She is absolutely politics as usual. That I feel that way must baffle some of you because you think I'm wrong for whatever reason, just as you supporting her is baffling to me. One of us is right and one of us is wrong.

This is Hillary and her stances (or is it? who knows!):

She voted for the Iraq war...but is now against.
She was against gay marriage...but now is for it.
She was against illegal immigrants...but is now for them earning a path to citizenship.
She voted for the Patriot Act. Twice. Hey some consistency!

And the list goes on. She is a complete fraud imo. And people don't care because Bernie is "unelectable" or can't get anything done or some other nonsense that you've been force fed.
 

hawk2025

Member
Me if America chooses Trump or Establishment

On the one hand, I'm amazed at the pessimism Hillary supporters have at what could be done if we all actually went by our principles rather than trying to game theory tiny wins. On the other hand, I'm amazed at the optimism with which Hillary voters seem to have in regard to our country and the world holding on okay with more of the status quo trajectory. I don't believe she would make even a little progress, I believe the engines of destruction in establishment politics have us running headlong into a wreck so fast that it completely outpaces anything she is trying to settle for. I see me and the country and world getting fucked in some measure by her or Trump. We're simply out of time to be dicking around with this lesser of two evils bullshit. It isn't about taking the necessary hit, it's about getting the fuck out of the way of the oncoming train. If America wants to settle for that because they are too scared to even try for what is right, then that's it.

As for trying to put blame on persons such as myself in the outcome of a Trump win, I find that completely ridiculous. If committed reform voters can be blamed for a Trump victory because they didn't settle for establishment, the people who voted establishment when they would have preferred reform simply because they had no faith in reform succeeding can be blamed for making the reform option so weak.

If you're going to try that game theory bullshit there are two realities you also need to reconcile to the situation. First, you accept the fact Trump voters are absolutely not backing down from anti-establishment and choose to adjust your vote accordingly, but then you see Bernie supporters likewise absolutely not backing down from their anti-establishment stance and don't adjust for them but instead blame them? That makes no sense.

Second, Trump could be seen as locking in to destruction, or he can be seen merely as a disruption. Remember how there was a huge backlash in the midterms toward GOP that blocked up many of Obama's motions? That can swing right back if people are so horrified with Trump, and that could likewise give momentum to a stronger reform movement. Would this accelerationism work? Who the fuck knows! That's why game theory is bullshit and you should vote for what is right. But if you're going to be all about game theory you need to acknowledge how Trump could be more effective for accelerating reform than sticking with the deathly slow establishment method.


This is so patently ridiculous in so many ways.

You make ridiculous, illogical points and dismiss Nobel-winning research in the same post.


I have no words. So, so ridiculous.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom