Funky Papa
FUNK-Y-PPA-4
Who was that in SOA?
I don't recall any of that in SoA, but man on man rape played an important part on The Shield.
Who was that in SOA?
Who was that in SOA?
Although it didn't immediately grab me like SOA i was thoroughly entertained and was kept interested.I didn't hate it. I'm interested to see where the plotline with the main character's new adoptive family goes. But this is far far away from the better medieval-themed shows out there.
I had the subtitles on, so I can't help you there.I can't tell if it's because the accents are really good or really bad, but half the time I was unable to understand what people were saying - could someone with a better ear for this sort of thing let me know which? Barring Gemma, who was terrible but coherent. It's like season 3 of Sons all over again.
I got confused when the main character became the executioner because the other guy with him was the real executioner, right?
And why does it seem like the Knight wields more power/influence then the dead baron?
Ouch!2 million fast national numbers.
Looking forward to see how Sutter reacts to the critical and audience reaction. Should be fun.
Ooof. It bombed.
Hard to argue with that.Good.
It looked cheap, was littered with cliches, most of the cast sucks, and the first hour was so dull that only atrue TV GAF championcompulsive geek like myself would've made it past that. The only person who had any presence at all and looked like he was having a little bit of fun was Stephen Moyer. The lead makes Kit Harington look like Bryan Cranston.
Someone tell me about Landgraf and that sterling FX quality, I need a good laugh. The last three dramas they've aired are this, Tyrant, and The Strain.
Hard to argue with that.
I think most people are good with GoT and don't want to watch anything else. lol
2 million fast national numbers.
More via the link.The Bastard Executioner had a somewhat modest opening in the ratings Wednesday night. The two hour premiere debuted to 2.1 million viewers and a 0.8 among adults 18-49.
By comparison, last year FX premiered The Strain to 4.7 million viewers (8 million after encores were added), Fargo opened to 2.7 million and Tyrant similarly debuted to 2.1 million viewers. The year before, The Americans and The Bridge both debuted to around 3 million in the overnights. So Bastard is firmly on the low side of FX series openers in recent years.
Obviously, these ratings will rise, and perhaps dramatically so, via DVR playback and repeats, which continue to have a growing impact on series performance.
The Bastard Executioner is creator Kurt Sutters follow-up series to his hit Sons of Anarchy. Set in the early 14th century, the story follows a knight (Lee Jones) in King Edward Is army who tries to escape the horrors of war.
Bastard has taken some lumps by critics, with EW giving it a C. At the Television Critics Assocations press tour In August, FX chief John Landgraf defended Bastard and urged critics to be patient, noting Sons of Anarchy likewise had a slow start.
Okay, a 0.8 isn't bad in the cable landscape today, but I'm sure FX had loftier expectations. Though I'm sure that number will drop.
Didn't the first episode of SOA do like 2-2.5 million? I didn't think SOA even did great numbers till season 2 and then raising again in season 3.2 million fast national numbers.
Yep. Not to sound like a broken record, since I know I've probably made this comment a bunch of times, but I really want to see where the numbers are at around episode 5-6. Like you, I'm almost certain they'll drop, and perhaps by a lot.
While the comparison is a bit long in the tooth, TBXs premiere was steady viewershipwise with the 2.53 million who tuned in for the September 3, 2008 debut of Sutters previous series Sons Of Anarchy. That 10 PM premiere on a Wednesday got a 1.2 rating among the key demo. Closer to home, the September 9, 2014 seventh and final season opener of SOA had a then record 6.2 million total viewers with 4.1million among the 18-49s. That result went up to 9.25 million viewers and 6.1 million among the demo in the Live + 3 results FX loves. The December 9, 2014 finale of SOA set a new record for the series and FX with 6.4 million total viewers with 4.2 million among adults 18-49, according to Nielsen. That rose to an audience of 9.26 million and 6.07 million in the demo in Live + 3.
FX are expected to release Live + 3 results for TBX, which stars Lee Jones as the cutting lead, Stephen Moyer and Katey Segal, among others, later this week.
So what happened over at FX? How does USA make a Mr. Robot and they make this and sex&drugs&denisleary'smidlifecrisis?
So what happened over at FX? How does USA make a Mr. Robot and they make this and sex&drugs&denisleary'smidlifecrisis?
Also I had trouble telling everyone apart at times.
You clearly have not watched Mr. Robot. Please rectify that.FX still makes great TV and I certainly prefer it to the superfluously designed USA shows. Shows just Married, You're the Worst, The Strain and The Americans amongst others are definitely better anything USA have to offer.
You clearly have not watched Mr. Robot. Please rectify that.
And dead souls, why did you have to remind me of sex&drugs. I'M STILL WATCHING IT![]()
And dead souls, why did you have to remind me of sex&drugs. I'M STILL WATCHING IT![]()
You know who had a lot of charisma yet never got credit for it as far as semi-recent FX goes? And seemed like he'd have none prior to the show airing (and in the early going)? Holt McCallany. Lights Out.I actually think the show is more similar to 'Outlander' than anything - UK setting; budding rebellion against the corrupt authoritarian figure(s); a charismatic, yet cruel and sexually fluid knight who serves as the main antagonist; village healer who everyone thinks is a witch...
Anyway, I thought the premiere was alright.
Random thoughts:
The pacing was definitely off - the two hour premiere felt about an hour too long and I think they could have easily cut most of the scenes from the first episode without losing anything of value.
I was fine with the level of violence - I expected there to be a lot of gore and whatnot in an FX series about an executioner. There were only a couple moments that struck me as edgy for the sake of it - the unborn child getting sliced out of its mother's womb and then laid to rest on her chest, for instance, was ridiculously over the top.
Like in FX's last few dramas, the male lead lacks charisma and screen presence. This is a problem. Nailing the casting (especially when it comes to the lead) is one of the most important things a show can do.
We must both be hypnotized by Bob Kelly pantomiming the drums.At least it's done this week. I've watched it all too.