This is bullshit, why didn't they use the Pirelli test car? The FIA need to ban Mercedes and throw them out of the championship.
Pirelli don't have a car.
Of course they do. At first they had a 2009 Toyota, now they're using a 2010 Renault R30 and this year they bought a 2011 HRT.
Which obviously isn't helping with the 2013 spec cars. They do need a current spec car to be able to test with.
Of course they do. At first they had a 2009 Toyota, now they're using a 2010 Renault R30 and this year they bought a 2011 HRT.
That doesn't justify testing tyres on one of the lead cars.
They know that, but they can't do anything about it. I was just disputing the claim that they don't have a car.Which obviously isn't helping with the 2013 spec cars. They do need a current spec car to be able to test with.
Pirelli Motorsport director Paul Hembery says the F1 tyre supplier would prefer to use a more modern car for its testing programme.
...
The same tyres behave very different when using a car from 2010, he was quoted as telling Total Race. The aerodynamic balance of the car is very different and that acts on the tyres. This year the teams have suffered problems, especially with the front tyres, but there has also been overheating with the rears.
We did not encounter these problems when testing because the car is two years old - but that is the only car we can use. It was a huge challenge to get hold of that car. I would obviously prefer one of the current test cars, but that is not going to happen.
Teams need about 18 months to fully develop a car, so even using one from last year is not possible. Developing the different compounds needs to be very precise and it is very difficult to get everything right when we are not testing with a suitable car.
Who should they test tyres with?That doesn't justify testing tyres on one of the lead cars.
They know that, but they can't do anything about it. I was just disputing the claim that they don't have a car.
This is what they said last year.
E: it looks like they already sold the HRT on eBay (as a charity auction). It's kinda telling. :lol
Who should they test tyres with?
It is believed that there was a similar test with Ferrari after Bahrain. There will be other tests as well with other teams as the season progresses but it seems that Red Bull is making a fuss because it was not doing the testing…
Thus it seems there is less of a story than the gabbling in the paddock suggests.
Schumi.Also, who was driving Mercedes car during this test?
"We found out second-hand last night," said Horner, when asked by AUTOSPORT about the situation. "We now need to deal with it through the proper channels, so that is what we will be doing.
"I can understand Pirelli wanting to test the tyres, as they have obviously got issues with the tyres. What is disappointing is that it has been done in a not transparent manner.
"A three-day test has taken place with a current car on tyres that are going to be used in the next grand prix. Irrelevant of what you call it, that is testing."
Horner suggests that although an agreement may exist in Pirelli's contract with the teams to allow individual tests, that is not enough grounds for it to believe Mercedes was allowed to test.
"I think there is confusion between what is contractually permissible and what a team when it enters a world championship is allowed to do within the sporting regulations," he said.
"It is a situation that we need clarification on, so our position is we are going to request that clarification."
AMuS reporting that other teams were testing with older cars (Ferrari used 2010 car in Bahrain) and Mercedes used this season's car. This is why Ferrari is also protesting.
Horner on the issue
Horner suggests that although an agreement may exist in Pirelli's contract with the teams to allow individual tests, that is not enough grounds for it to believe Mercedes was allowed to test.
I am getting Content Encoding Error when accessing threads. Anyone with same problem?
Bottas showing off
I am getting Content Encoding Error when accessing threads. Anyone with same problem?
FOM considers online streaming after 2015, when most of current TV contracts expire:
http://www.autoweek.com/article/20130525/f1/130529825
Mercedes have discovered a spider infestation in Hamiltons car this morning.
FOM considers online streaming after 2015, when most of current TV contracts expire:
http://www.autoweek.com/article/20130525/f1/130529825
in 240p and mono soundFOM considers online streaming after 2015, when most of current TV contracts expire:
http://www.autoweek.com/article/20130525/f1/130529825
It is so fucking stupid that someone could come to the conclusion that only having his sport available in the UK through a pay service for primary access would be a good idea.
Surely that is good for the sport right?!?! Derp.
Nice! If the price isn't insane, I'd happily buy access to that directly from the website. And if that story is accurate, you'd be able to pick your own viewpoint, too. Want onboard from a particular driver? Pick it! That'd be neat.FOM considers online streaming after 2015, when most of current TV contracts expire:
http://www.autoweek.com/article/20130525/f1/130529825
If they can't reliably stream telemetry from the onboard electronics to the teams, how can they possibly hope to stream *anything* over the internet?FOM considers online streaming after 2015, when most of current TV contracts expire:
http://www.autoweek.com/article/20130525/f1/130529825
I don't know why they don't do what Motogp does. A few times a year, when there is a 2+ week break, they stay at the circuit Monday and sometimes Tuesday. Testing on mass would have to be cheaper, shared marshaling and medical costs, maybe bernie could open his wallet and help!
Sky f1 is the HRT of the TV world