The Google Veo 3 AI video generator now incorporates sound. It might have crossed the uncanny valley

you're not going to bait me into making a completely waste of time effort for you bruv, you just keep believing that's what real life looks like.

yet you're STILL replying lmao wasting more time you could be explaining it. If I'm knowledgeable about something, truly knowledgeable, I can spout off about it with a detailed response very quickly that breaks down the problems precisely. The difference is you have no idea what you're saying, you're just retreading "meh" tropes. "AI is SO obvious." Really? Well break it down quickly.

But again, you can't. It's so typical. No substance and zero ability to prove your point. Weak.
 
Last edited:
I've wasted nothing, as I said this takes no effort; I've also pointed you to hemo hemo's post but as expected it wasn't good enough.
You're also free to stop quoting me if you think I'm "wasting replies".
I know what I'm free to do, thanks. You made a claim you can't back up and you're trying but failing miserably to hide behind "I'm not wasting time to answer you guys" but you've wasted even more time not answering. Brilliant!
 
yet you're STILL replying lmao wasting more time you could be explaining it
no, I'm replying to your post, which I mentioned takes no effort at all, the fact that you still think these replies take as much effort as "go through and explain in detail", shows how detached you are from the reality of the subject; again keep believing this is what real life looks like it doesn't matter to me.

You made a claim you can't back up and you're trying but failing miserably to hide behind "I'm not wasting time to answer you guys"
Now it's you who's proving my point, I've pointed you to hemo hemo's post, but it's been ignored, clearly showing it's a waste of effort even attempt to explain anything.
 
no, I'm replying to your post, which I mentioned takes no effort at all, the fact that you still think these replies take as much effort as "go through and explain in detail", shows how detached you are from the reality of the subject; again keep believing this is what real life looks like it doesn't matter to me.


Now it's you who's proving my point, I've pointed you to hemo hemo's post, but it's been ignored, clearly showing it's a waste of effort even attempt to explain anything.
Tl;dr but I'm sure this is the gist of your reply "I'm wrong and Ive backed myself into a corner and with each reply I further prove how wrong I am and like many I will double down proving that I'm wrong."
 
Last edited:
no, I'm replying to your post, which I mentioned takes no effort at all, the fact that you still think these replies take as much effort as "go through and explain in detail", shows how detached you are from the reality of the subject; again keep believing this is what real life looks like it doesn't matter to me.

But you said it's obvious, so that shouldn't take any effort from you. The fact is you can't explain in detail or simply, you're not capable.
 
one sentence pointing you to an explanation (multiple times now) is TL; DR yet you asked for
I'll take a one sentence answer
Captain America Lol GIF by mtv

Keep on proving why it wasn't a good idea to attempt an explanation to me.

But you said it's obvious, so that shouldn't take any effort from you.
....that's some logic bruv, just because it's obvious doesn't mean explaining in detail to someone who thinks it looks like real life "shouldn't take any effort" lmao.
In fact I've already given the "shouldn't take any effort" explanation in my first post:
people don't move/look like that.
And I've pointed you to hemo hemo's post, but y'all keep ignoring that one for some reason
Jimmy Fallon What GIF by The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon
 
Last edited:
I wish google veo 3 could omit the nonsensical arguing in this thread

Incredible tech. Scary. World's going to be a much different place in 10 years.
 
....that's some logic bruv, just because it's obvious doesn't mean explaining in detail to someone who thinks it looks like real life "shouldn't take any effort" lmao.
In fact I've already given the "shouldn't take any effort" explanation in my first post:

Look at the posts you've made responding to this same point, not just to me either. There is absolutely no way you couldn't have picked one example, even with timestamps AND fully describing what you're seeing that's "so obvious" and shut it down with ease.

You're just full of shit. That's all there is to it.
 
I wish google veo 3 could omit the nonsensical arguing in this thread

Incredible tech. Scary. World's going to be a much different place in 10 years.



Nah, we got people in this thread that can detect any frame as a blatantly fake. If the world ever goes under due to AI, we can always count of neogaf experts. They might save the world without explaining how they did it, but who cares.
 
Jurassic Park Ian Malcom GIF


You're not looking for "an explanation", you just don't like your views have been challenged, which is why you've repeatedly now ignored the explanation I've pointed to.

Really and truly I just like watching you continuously prove my point right. Which again, you keep doing with every post to myself and others. I'm sure there are people that can easily point out AI bullshit in many frames here, thats not my point, my point is you're not one of those people. You're a fake cool kid acting like you know when you don't.
 
And these are still early days.

I'm just looking forward to a few years from now, when some team of people completely remake the last 3 seasons of Game of Thrones to not suck total ass.
 
I could explain why the last 2 pages looks stupid but i don't have the time for it.

Took me 30 seconds.... Better brush up your AI skills :P

"After reviewing page 5 of the NeoGAF thread titled "The Google Veo 3 AI video generator now incorporates sound. It might have crossed the uncanny valley," it's evident that the discussion has deviated from the original topic. Instead of focusing on the technological advancements of Google's Veo 3 AI video generator, the conversation has shifted towards off-topic banter and personal anecdotes. This divergence has led to a lack of substantive discussion about the AI technology itself.


Such digressions can detract from the informative value of the thread, making it less useful for readers seeking insights into the AI's capabilities and implications.
"

Brought to you by a non-sentient AI.
 
Last edited:
Brah, did you just try and link me to Bluesky?

itOsUCx.jpeg
Well, not you specifically. But I did wonder if it'd get a reaction, and it's quite relevant to the discussion.

People discounting and trusting sources of info based on preconceived notions is going to help quite a bit in the disinformation wars. The quotes are, as far as I know, pretty reasonable takes, even if he hasn't posted through a channel that's more accepted round here!
 
The good news is that Google seems very ahead of the competition and openai can suck my balls.
The bad news is that it's Google.
 
Has anyone who is looking at these videos seen one where the shots are longer than 4–5 seconds?
Well. This stuff takes time to generate and testers what to show multiple examples of different situations.

There's also the issue with visual consistency. AI still needs stable references to generation from, without objects changing form.
 
There's also the issue with visual consistency. AI still needs stable references to generation from, without objects changing form.
This is what I'm thinking; I wonder if the longer the shot is, the more inconsistencies will come up. I've noticed inconsistencies in the subject's direction and position between shots too.
 
There's absolutely still an uncanny valley effect, but it's not the entirely of a clip its like a couple of seconds of "that was odd."
 
At a certain point I'll just use the internet as a tool for purely paying bills and managing my paid services.

I don't need infinite slop. I go to like 3 websites, and when those ultimately fail me I'll just abandoned the internet entirely.

"I can make infinite advertisements" sounds great until that applies to everyone. This will end terribly.
 
You can only veo 3? On ultimate plan? Also, can one use the api, and create any content? It's to believe the copy right stuff wouldn't have a filter 5rough the developer api. Not sure what they lock out.
 
Could be a great tool just for conceptualisation or creating visual targets for games that are yet to be up and running:





Devs could have their own narrow models with strict controls and feed in all of their concept art, ideas, sounds etc. Then have it spit out a visual to inspire them or work towards.
 
Last edited:
Don't worry if you can somehow tell these are AI: users leaving comments about the "tells" in these videos will be integrated into future models to further pass as "real".
A lot of those people are full of shit anyway and just know that it's AI because they were told. Not saying people in this forum specifically.

But for instance before civ 7 got revealed there was this picture from above that looked pretty realistic but still video gamey kind of. It was posted on reddit saying what if civ 7 looked like this.

There were people writing essays on why it was AI, on what the tells were and what not.

The only problem is, that post with that same picture had already been made before civ 6 came out somewhere else, saying what if civ 6 looked like this. That was over 10 years ago so i know for a fact that wasn't AI. But all those self proclaimed experts were convinced that it was and giving their reasons on why it was 100% AI.
 
A lot of those people are full of shit anyway and just know that it's AI because they were told. Not saying people in this forum specifically.

But for instance before civ 7 got revealed there was this picture from above that looked pretty realistic but still video gamey kind of. It was posted on reddit saying what if civ 7 looked like this.

There were people writing essays on why it was AI, on what the tells were and what not.

The only problem is, that post with that same picture had already been made before civ 6 came out somewhere else, saying what if civ 6 looked like this. That was over 10 years ago so i know for a fact that wasn't AI. But all those self proclaimed experts were convinced that it was and giving their reasons on why it was 100% AI.
Right? I do see how the animations are too fluid, sort of Disney animation -like, but only after I know it's AI.

I'd like to know how many AI videos have already fooled me that I just consumed and moved on from.
 
Top Bottom