TheLaughingStock
Member
They should've worked towards abolishing the corporate tax or made the tax cut bigger to supercharge the economy.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-gops-corporate-tax-cut-may-not-be-as-big-as-it-looks/
Who would use the tax windfall to invest more in their companies?
Cohn might have thought the question rhetorical. Only a few days before, during a television appearance, he had said, We believe that were going to have a very stimulative effect on the economy by lowering the business tax rate, by lowering the corporate rate, and making America competitive with the rest of the world. Except the response from the impromptu focus group at the Journal event was muted; only a smattering of the assemblys members indicated they would use the proceeds from a tax cut in a way that would produce a stimulative effect.
Why arent the other hands up? Cohn asked.
Heres one answer: Cohn and others in the Trump administration might have oversold the potential benefits of their tax plan. One big reason that the legislation wont supercharge the economy is that the tax cut isnt as big as it looks on paper.
Under the latest version of the bill a compromise worked out between negotiators from the House and Senate the federal corporate rate would reportedly drop from 35 percent to 21 percent, according to the Washington Post and several other news outlets. (When state levies are included, the U.S. statutory corporate tax rate averages to 39 percent, the highest in the Group of 20.) But thanks to a bevy of deductions, few American corporations actually pay 39 or even 35 percent. Estimates vary, but Kent Smetters, the Wharton School professor who runs the Penn Wharton Budget Model, said in an interview that he reckons the average effective rate that U.S. corporations pay is around 22 percent.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-gops-corporate-tax-cut-may-not-be-as-big-as-it-looks/