FunkMiller
Gold Member
Why would literally any functional brain having person blame racism on TLM financial success or failure?
Why would literally any functional brain having person blame racism on TLM financial success or failure?
The movie did the following.....
- Made $120 domesically the first weekend.
- Made $326 million world-wide in 9 days
- Has an "A" Cinema Score
- Has a 68% Rotten Tomatoes score from critics (meaning they viewed it as good, but with some flaws)
- Has a 94% Rotten Tomatoes audience score
So, I guess the initiative to make sure it's viewed as a flop and ignored hasn't worked either lol
There's something between the words, FLOP and RAGING SUCCESS. I hate this new-age binary internet world we live in now. Now breaking even is considered a flop. And a hit movie is "teh great3st moviez of all timez!"
The way Hollywood has traditionaly qualified a movie as "A Flop" is when it cant recoup its develoment and marketing cost from US ticket sales alone.Clearly this movie won't be a success to the bigots (edit: and racists) unless it earns 4x its production budget. Try and keep up.
The way Hollywood has traditionaly qualified a movie as "A Flop" is when it cant recoup its develoment and marketing cost from US ticket sales alone.
International sales returns are seen idealy as 100% profit.
You might not agree with that standard but thats what its always been.
Clearly this movie won't be a success to the bigots (edit: and racists) unless it earns 4x its production budget. Try and keep up.
Clearly this movie won't be a success to the bigots (edit: and racists) unless it earns 4x its production budget. Try and keep up.
Why would literally any functional brain having person blame racism on TLM financial success or failure?
Oh, there is definitely merch with the "new" ariel. But they are also kinda blending the two into what kinda looks like a tanner version of "old" ariel with more emphasis on the red hair.I wonder how much they're making from merchandising for these live action films. And how much of that can actually be attributed to the remake.
When The Lion King came out, all of the merchandise was based on the animated film, because those are iconic, recognizable designs. No one wants a shirt with some random lion. I haven't checked TLM merch, but assume the same applies here.
So the remake might increase interest in merch, but it's probably the animated designs (and film) that people actually like.
Well, looks to me like they used the same mold for each mermaid, they just changed the base color and the paint job. The eye placement, nose, and lips are pretty much what all these dolls get. A more almond eye shape to match the live action actress perhaps.Jesus even the doll has distant eyes...
A few corrections:- Made $120 domesically the first weekend.
- Made $326 million world-wide in 9 days
- Has an "A" Cinema Score
- Has a 68% Rotten Tomatoes score from critics (meaning they viewed it as good, but with some flaws)
- Has a 94% Rotten Tomatoes audience score
So, I guess the initiative to make sure it's viewed as a flop and ignored hasn't worked either lol
Why would literally any functional brain having person blame racism on TLM financial success or failure?
Look at that virtuous Disney go!Audiences in China can be what turn a flop into a financial success, one of the problems with that is China is pretty racist toward black people for the most part. It's why western movie posters prominently featuring black actors are changed for China.
The Force Awakens posters for example:
Kind of difficult to remove TLM from the posters but they can obfuscate her skin color.
Edit:
And just because I smoked a joint and got curious.... Black Panther
Audiences in China can be what turn a flop into a financial success, one of the problems with that is China is pretty racist toward black people for the most part. It's why western movie posters prominently featuring black actors are changed for China.
The Force Awakens posters for example:
Kind of difficult to remove TLM from the posters but they can obfuscate her skin color.
Edit:
And just because I smoked a joint and got curious.... Black Panther
The movie did the following.....
- Made $120 domesically the first weekend.
- Made $326 million world-wide in 9 days
- Has an "A" Cinema Score
- Has a 68% Rotten Tomatoes score from critics (meaning they viewed it as good, but with some flaws)
- Has a 94% Rotten Tomatoes audience score
So, I guess the initiative to make sure it's viewed as a flop and ignored hasn't worked either lol
There's something between the words, FLOP and RAGING SUCCESS. I hate this new-age binary internet world we live in now. Now breaking even is considered a flop. And a hit movie is "teh great3st moviez of all timez!"
It is fucking bizarre how much china is scared by black people.
Is there a reason why china hate black people so much?
Like, it's 2023, gtfo with this backward mentality.
Audiences in China can be what turn a flop into a financial success, one of the problems with that is China is pretty racist toward black people for the most part. It's why western movie posters prominently featuring black actors are changed for China.
Kind of difficult to remove TLM from the posters but they can obfuscate her skin color.
The real question, the only question really, is which of these posters are getting used at theaters to promote the movies in China? Just because there are two options, that doesn't mean they're used with equal frequency.Fake news.
Here's another Chinese movie poster, it's exactly the same as the US movie poster.
Besides that, the Chinese poster that supposedly hides the ethnicity of the lead actress was also used in the US.
As a bonus, when I did an image search for Wakanda Forever (in Chinese 黑豹2:瓦干達萬歲) , the first image I saw was this one:
Boy, those Chinese cinemas are pretty bad at hiding the race of all of these actors!
I lived in china years ago and yes there is racial problems there but it was mostly with the more working class side of the population who don't go to the cinema very often. The theatre was very expensive there when I lived there so people didn't go quite as often.To add some context to the discussion over whether China is racist against black people:
https://variety.com/2023/film/news/...-the-spider-verse-opening-weekend-1235632699/
A Spider-Man film with a black main character front and centre went to number one at the box office there. Now, the number was pretty soft at 17m, but far higher than Little Mermaid's terrible 3m.
While the racial dimension may well be a factor, I'd argue the bigger factor is that Disney make fucking shit movies these days, and post Ukrainian invasion, the Chinese appetite for western product may well have slumped, due to the fact they support Russia.
It is fucking bizarre how much china is scared by black people.
Fake news.
Here's another Chinese movie poster, it's exactly the same as the US movie poster.
Besides that, the Chinese poster that supposedly hides the ethnicity of the lead actress was also used in the US.
As a bonus, when I did an image search for Wakanda Forever (in Chinese 黑豹2:瓦干達萬歲) , the first image I saw was this one:
Boy, those Chinese cinemas are pretty bad at hiding the race of all of these actors!
The way Hollywood has traditionaly qualified a movie as "A Flop" is when it cant recoup its develoment and marketing cost from US ticket sales alone.
International sales returns are seen idealy as 100% profit.
You might not agree with that standard but thats what its always been.
And back to TLM and the thought processes behind it: the whole race swapping stuff - was it worth it? Why take that chance doing that to an iconic beloved IP? They must have known they would have riled up parts of the fanbase, and they must have thought that they could ride it out. From a pure business perspective: it was goddamn stupid and pure hubris, and automatically meant an uphill battle in certain markets.
But how are you getting that it's going to break even?
It's been widely reported by the trades that the movie cost 250 million to make, with a further 140 million marketing budget. Total of 390 million. A film needs to make almost double its costs to break even (theatre chains take the other 40% plus). So it needs about 700 million to break even.
Projections now have it coming in or around 500 - 600 million.
That is a flop by any sensible metric. Due to the grotesquely huge production and marketing costs.
My ex was chinese, it's very strange..
they just don't like dark skin, they are even racist against people from India even though most Chinese are natually dark skinned so they go to crazy lengths to avoid the sun.
Like my ex was aware it was pretty silly but when I asked why they have such issues with it she was like..
"it just looks dirty"
Well now you have.I've NEVER read this in my life. Maybe you have, but not me at all!!! And read lots of movie press and listen to some podcasts that cover Hollywood and have NEVER heard this in my life!
They look like community mascotMy ex was chinese, it's very strange..
they just don't like dark skin, they are even racist against people from India even though most Chinese are natually dark skinned so they go to crazy lengths to avoid the sun.
Like my ex was aware it was pretty silly but when I asked why they have such issues with it she was like..
"it just looks dirty"
lol as someone who has been on business trips to china many many times over the years - for casual racism is easily one of the worst places in the world and I am white as fuck. They look at foreigners like aliens and some even trying to get a picture of me in some areas because they rarely saw non chinese people.
I think the biggest thing about them is how blunt they are, like with how much communist loyalists turn each other in for shit they say that is out of favor they are not very PC and don't hold back on anything.
if you're even slightly out of shape everyone will call you fat, and I was a little taken back about how casually my ex wife would talk to my black friend about him her observations about black people.
I lived in china years ago and yes there is racial problems there but it was mostly with the more working class side of the population who don't go to the cinema very often. The theatre was very expensive there when I lived there so people didn't go quite as often.
So I'm not exactly sure it would translate to movie tickets as much.
The CCP begins brainwashing nationalism and china-first retoric from the school years. It starts early.
China on one hand is a very good place to live as long as you play by the rules, public transport / healthcare / food in the major cities is about as good as it gets anywhere in the world especially in hong kong of shanghai in particular, dont know about rural areas. On the other hand it is very very hostile to foreigners. Very few people speak english, and those that do will not talk openly with you unless you are paying for something.
I reckon that sticking closer to the original would have resulted in, maybe, an extra $100M worldwide.At $250 Million on production alone, I doubt any beautiful white girl would have made more money domestically with TLM either. The quality of the movie has a ceiling to just how much it could of possibly make. Personally after watching it I would have put that ceiling at $800m (that's a high number guys). Folks need to remember that June is PACKED and this is the post-pandemic era.
At $250 Million on production alone, I doubt any beautiful white girl would have made more money domestically with TLM either. The quality of the movie has a ceiling to just how much it could have possibly make. Personally after watching it I would have put that ceiling at $800m (that's a high number guys). Folks need to remember that June is PACKED and this is the post-pandemic era.
What I don't get on these remakes is why bother. Why not do a sequel? I think there would be more interest from both fans of the original and a younger generation that grew up on these movies watching them on video/streaming.
Instead, they remake the same story, make odd casting choices, and anger fans of the originals or load it up with culture war bullshit.
I still think the sequels would all be terrible for sure, but I also think they would be much more lucrative to Disney and reach a larger audience that eats trash for entertainment. Just my $.02. I don't care either way.
Review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes reports that 17% of 6 critics gave the film a positive review, and the average rating is 3.8/10. In 2011, Total Film ranked it as 27th among the 50 worst children's films ever made.
I reckon that sticking closer to the original would have resulted in, maybe, an extra $100M worldwide.
There is also the fatigue of these remakes. The novelty has worn off and the quality has been on a steady decline.
If this movie came out 5 years ago it would probably do better but too much audience goodwill has been lost.
Yeah, but I mean a true effort being made. Not the straight-to-video trash from the late '90s, early 2000s.They already did that, and it was utter trash.
They already did that, and it was utter trash.
Yeah, but I mean a true effort being made. Not the straight-to-video trash from the late '90s, early 2000s.
Watched it yesterday. Arielles skin color was nicely explained by her sisters being of the race from the ocean they represent (oh, Triton, you unfaithfull bastard). But how is Eriks mother also a POC?
And do we know how Meermaids reproduce? Arielle has a belly button! So they are mamals?
EVERYTHING IS GOOD. DON'T ASK QUESTIONS. CONSUME. EVERYTHING IS GOOD. CONSUME.‘Little Mermaid’ negative reviews compel IMDb to change rating system
IMDb stated it won’t disclose how the new method will generate the rating to ensure it “remains effective.”nypost.com