• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The Official Bond 50 watch thread: Let us journey with him thru the years

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bond-50-xl.jpeg


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Okay so I've been a lifetime Bond fan more or less. I wanna say I started getting serious about the films when the VHS anniversary sets started coming out in the mid 90s. I was probably like 13-14 at the time and would save my allowence to purchase a new VHS tape as soon as I can from my local Walmart lol, hoping one day to collect them all... I think I ended up only getting 3 or so in the end. This I believe was also around the same time Goldeneye came out which I did in fact in the theater opening weekend. I also got obsessed with the N64 game like everyone else at some point.
I've never actually seen every Bond film and remember flat-out avoiding the Roger Moore era for whatever reason ...maybe because I'd heard how silly they were.

Anyway, with this recent amazing convient Box-Set having dropped late last year, I finally have the perfect opportunity to catch all of these is one fell swoop, as a almost 30 year old man, with only a slight nostalgic bias hopefully.
That's right, while I am a Bond super fan, I will also be watching them unobjectively as possible, which shouldn't be too hard as some as I've never seen anyway. My wife has also agreed to take the trip with me as well despite having grown up hating the character due to her Dad insisting on watching them. Daniel Craig's reign made her a believer though.

Also pose this as a thread as an opportunity for other GAFers to make this journey with me

I will update as often as I can but understand, I can't and won't be marathoning these. This will be an ongoing project, so here we go!
Oh yeah, thar be spoilers!



Dr._No_-_UK_cinema_poster.jpg


Dr. No

This was actually one of the VHS films I bought from Wal-Mart when it was released. I had absolutely no idea what to expect, I just wanted to collect Bond video tapes!
So yeah, I hadn't seen it in a very long time but knew that, unlike OHMSS which I very fondly remember, this didn't really stick with me.
Watching again now, I can appreciate some things about it but ultimately I find it to be a very clunky start for the franchise outside of a few key scenes.
We of course get Connery's "Bond, James Bond" iconic entrance and, what can I say, it's still boss and you've probably seen it a million times. Unfortunately I'd say it's one of the few bits I'd fondly remembered the most.
Everything else was widly hit or miss. For every one scene I thought that was geniunely good and, you know Spy/Bond-like, you get two others that are either unintentionally funny or even worse, overly long and sorta bad... And that's a bigger problem for this film, it feels like it fucking goes on forever and ever. I'm a bit understanding of this though because well, I gew up in a different time and place where editing practicing and shit are different I guess. Old people movies and stuff. Fair enough.
Anyway, one of the bits I did love was the little scene of Bond playing Solitare while waiting for his objective. Such a nice detail that honestly you don't get to see very often.
So the film has severe pacing issues where scenes just go on for way to damn long. It really feels like everyone involved was trying to either establish the tone for character/series and also finding shit for him to do because... well alot of the time, even though he is, it feels like Bond isn't doing shit but merely hanging around the Carribean.
Another thing, if you're looking for actual action setpieces in this, I'm afraid you're really out of luck here as you only really get: A scene early on where Bond beats up a dude who completely overacts to every hit, a bit where Bond and his sidekicks for whatever reason decide to take on what is essentially a amphibious vehicle mounted with a flame thrower with merely a couple of revolvers... while hiding behind...a bush. I swear this scene feels thrown in here because the producers or writers felt the film needed SOME kind of action. It's utterly stupid. One more "action-scene" is Bond slooowy making his was through a vent while trying not to burn his delicate hands ...and that's it. Intense stuff. And of course, he defeats the villain who thought it was a smart idea to have his bionic hands coated in a glossy finish. You honestly don't get too much of an opinion of Dr.No as he's barely in the film.
Anyway, review has gone on long enough and I basically summarize that I think the film has a few moments, but is mostly forgettable and really doesn't hold up at all. Still it was necessary in order to get something vastly improved. Wife thought this one was a chore to sit through also.

2.5 out of 5

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

James-Bond-From-Russia-With-Love-Movie-Poster-Red-Clay-Soul.jpg


From Russia with Love

Yes, this film is still as classy as it's amazing poster art (^___^)

Another one I hadn't see in a long time. Already the Mrs. was very skeptical about continuing this journey as she was very unimpressed with Dr. No
I assured her though she was in for a treat!

Thus far probably my favorite of the classic Bond films behind OHMSS. This one is oh so classy and despite having almost not hitting it's release date, it manages to far exceed Dr. No is almost every conceivable way.
It doesn't really drag too much, it's wonderful to look at, has a Bond girl who isn't midly mentally handicapped like Ursula Andress' character was (THAT whole relationship was weeeird) and actually has some competently staged action, most of which holds up rather well. Here we get what honestly feels like the most espionage-like of the early Bonds. Not alot of gadgets or gimmicks, just Spy Vs Spy shit that you can really sink your teeth into. Donald Grant is still an impressive villain and it really comes off like Bond is fucked initially. Rosa Klebb is silly fun and Tatiana Romanova is still a joy to both listen to and look at. It also helps that her character actually has a point to the story.
The main theme that plays in the beginning is still a damn joy to listen to as well. I can see why EA decided this was the one to make into an actual game and pulled Connery, regrettably, out of retirement

I would whole-heartedly recommend this film to anyone curious about the early Bond films ...dare I say I would demand they actually start with this one first. It just feels classic whereas Dr. No just felt bumblingly. The wife thought this one was "much better" too lol

4.5 out of 5

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


MPW-33026


Goldfinger

I wanna say this is the first time I've ever seen this one in it's entirety.

Coming off the blissful high of From Russia with Love, this one mostly let's me down unfortunately :(
Bond now starts to begin the trend of being borderline rapey at times and I'm sorry, despite the name, Goldfinger himself fucking sucks as a villain. He's fat, ugly, and comes off as dumb. The first scene between him and Bond outside the pool is comedic but not in a good way.
Oddjob shows up and is amusing I guess but most of this film for whatever reason is really forgettable to me. I know I'd like to watch it again at some point to see if my opinion changes. It's certainly nowhere near as bland as Dr.No ...just, sort of there. Bond get's plenty of opportunities to contract some STDs as well. Honestly overrated if you ask me and really FEELS like one of the films that was created because the series was more or less annualized. I guess people were clamouring for more gimmicky Bond, because that's what you get here.

3 out of 5

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


12496.jpg


** Real women have curves **

Thunderball

(first time I've seen this one fully)

My god, I had no idea SO much of this film took place underwater. SO.MUCH.WATER. It has a great Making-Of on the Blu-ray btw. Probably more interesting that alot of the final product =P
So they really went for it on this one. Up to this point, Bond films hadn't been so epic as far as set-pieces and whatnot. This is one that changed that and probably kick-started that aspect of the franchise. We get the opening with the iconic jet pack (with some GREAT wide shots here btw), A LOT of underwater shit including a giant underwater scuba battle! I honestly never new this existance and while silly by today's standards, is still really fucking impressive from a staging/execution standpoint. Also, we got a rocket-yacht at the end!
I'm warmer to this one then Goldfinger for sure. Mostly because I admire it's ambition and scope. Watching the supplementals, it's really fascinating how really huge this film was at the time of it's release. Merchandise galore, lines around the block, etc. You'd think it was Star Wars.
Fascinating stuff. Also, Tom Jones' Thunderball theme is fucking BAAAAALLER!!!!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3.5 out of 5

you_only_live_twice_1967.jpg


Film isn't as fun as this poster :(

You Only Live Twice

** This was another VHS tape I bought from Wal-mart lol**

So you finally get to see the film that Austin Powers took quite a lot from. We get Volcano lairs! Gyro Copters, Nancy Sinatra, Ninjas!, MoneyPenny looking amazing, and japanese Bond!? ...WTF!?
Some say this is when the series released it's first dud. I disagree as that honor goes to the first film, Dr. No. ...Come at me Bro!
Anyway, the film is mostly a fine Bond film with some solid action ...it's just when it get's 3/4 the way thru it takes a turn for the bizarre. Bond essentialy becomes an honorary japanese, complete with slanty eye make-up! Yup, you really get reminded of the era we're were living in at the time, just like Breakfast at Tiffany's ...don't even ask why he needed this done, as it really doesn't matter. It's fucking awful and almost completely undoes the entire film.
Thankfully you get to see a momentus climax in the infamous volcano cave, which is actually an entire damn set they built. This thing is amazingly impressive and be sure to watching the Making-Of that goes further into it. On a sad note, the camera operator for all the Gyro-Copter stuff would lose his leg filming that scene, but would still go on the industry for a few more years, including capturing the amazing ski footage found in OHMSS. Like a boss.

3 out of 5

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

st-564296.jpg


Oh how I do love this poster!


On Her Majesty's Secret Service

And here was are, one of my all time favorite Bond films. This was another one I actually bought on VHS back in the 90s and even then I knew this to be just a legimately good fucking film
In this one, Peter Hunt, who had up until this point been the series second unit director, steps front n' center to as he put it "Make the best Bond film there is," and by and large he succeeds and then some.
Right off that bat, I'm state something contraversial:

George Lazenby was a better Bond than Connery
for me anyway...

Yep, you heard me. Even though the Producers/Director where grooming him to be just a Connery knock-off, he still manages to best him because he just brought something different. He's physically imposing and more capable than Connery ever was (helps that he was like 28 at the time), is a damn fine looking man! maintains the swagger while keeping an edge, also unlike Connery, who by the time You Only Live Twice came around, was more or less phoning it in, both physically and emotionally.
Bond finally also meets his match with Diana Rigg ...man what a dish this one is.
While their relationship is completely obligatory early on, both in narrative and series expectations, Bond eventually falls for her and she does him. Till this day I'd say the closest thing you get to this emotional level of Bond's character is Vesper in Casino Royale. Absolutely wonderful stuff and it makes the final scene that much more brutal... that and the fact they completely ruin it by throwing the damn Bond theme in almost immediately. Almost as bad as Ford's Decker narration on the roof at the end of Blade Runner.
Anyway, I could go on and on about this film, but I won't. There's a lot of great character beats in it, like when Bond casually reads a playboy while waiting for a safe to crack or of course, the timeless line "This didn't happen to the other fella" which believe or not, was adlibed and kept because Lazenby kept saying it to Peter Hunt on the set.
Other than a middle that sort of drags, once the film picks up again, it never really let's up.
Also. Kojak plays probably the best iteration of Blofeld up to that point and honestly ever. And Bond probably contracted every STD there was in that clinic.
The opening theme, while not having lyrics, is still of my favorite in the whole franchise despite being played over old footage from prior films, which itself was tacky and wrong.

LOVE LOVE LOVE this film

5 out of 5

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

6067.jpg


(first time watch)

Diamonds are Forever

This one is directed by Guy Hamilton, who prior made his debut with Goldfinger. Between that and obviously seeing Connery returned, I wasn't too optimistic about what I would be getting here...

Oh boy :(

This is hands down, the worst Bond film I've seen thus far. Yeah, I know I know, I got shit like Moonraker and Man with the Golden Gun to long forward to, but obviously we're not there yet.
Thankfully I'm not alone as doing some casual research, you'll find the general reception to this one is pretty weak anyway.
Sean Connery looks like he's bored the entire time (clearly collecting a paycheck, of which was indeed quite large at the time). Physically he's let himself go even more since You only live Twice. Yeah I know, this is a bit of a shallow observation but it's still pretty jarring going from strapping young George L. back to middle-age pudgy Connery, who clearly doesn't appear concerned with looking physically imposing.
They, whether purposely or not, dialed up the camp factor considerably here and there are moments where I was just in awe of the film's callow, meandering attitude. Shit just happens and people look like they don't necessarily know where this is going next.
Blofeld returns in probably he's weakest stint, now sporting a full head of hair, being played by Charles Grey, who already played another character in You Only Live Twice. It all just comes off as lazy. Then there's this middle bit in the Casino where they're running around that just goes on and on. All it does is highlight's just how ugly the setting of Vegas for this film really was. We do get an inspired car chase around the middle, but once again they get lazy here as the pivitol moment where the vehicle hits two wheels to squeeze through an alley, only to come out the other side on the wrong two sets of wheels! Watching the "Inside -insert bond film-" Making-Of (these are damn excellent btw!) reveals that they essentially couldn't recreate the stunt with a different crew and ended up lazily throwing a car interior shot where the car impossibly flips to it's other side just before exiting said tight alley. It's duuuumb and makes no sense. Still, Guy Hamilton really shows his action chops here and you'll get to see it even more with Live or Let Die.
There's only a couple of positives... Literally just two I can honestly think of lol. The characters of Mr. Wint and Mr. Kidd hold up really well and come off as surprisingly cool. They even manage to casually throw in the fact that they're indeed lovers, very tastefully.
Also, we get an honestly well staged elevator fight that is probably the best action in the whole picture
Oh and of course, there's Bambi and Thumper ...you'll see (>__<)

This movie ....ugh

2 out of 5


Stay tuned for more!
 
Looks like he got banned for thread whining. Not sure how long that is.

But looking at those reviews and scores I'm not sure we lost much. YOLT better than Dr. NO? No sir, not even liking OHMSS can save that.

I actually took about a month to watch these all just after they came out before Skyfall. I think I put a list of favorites in some other thread. All the films up through Brosnan also have pretty great documentaries that run about 30min each, and there are a few interesting pieces on Fleming as well.
 
Just on a side-note when doing these Bond marathons/re-watches do people generally watch Never Say Never Again and Casino Royale (the spoof one)? I just find it odd how some are like 50 years of bond, 25 films then don't bother those two (which makes it 23).

Personally I remember about a decade ago there would 1 a week on TV which had Never Say Never Again, IIRC after Octopussy and I've never seen the spoof Casino Royale (
or Quantum of Solice...not putting them on the same level or anything...
)
 
Just on a side-note when doing these Bond marathons/re-watches do people generally watch Never Say Never Again and Casino Royale (the spoof one)? I just find it odd how some are like 50 years of bond, 25 films then don't bother those two (which makes it 23).

Personally I remember about a decade ago there would 1 a week on TV which had Never Say Never Again, IIRC after Octopussy and I've never seen the spoof Casino Royale (
or Quantum of Solice...not putting them on the same level or anything...
)

Never say never again was fine but I skip Casino Royale... And anything after Goldeneye.
 

Chinner

Banned
I'm doing the same as I have realised that I have actually missed or forgot most of the older bond films.

going to watch thunderball next. forgot how good FRWL is
 

Wool

Member
I made a thread about the best Bond movie. You have a much better OP though! I completely agree about On Her Majesty's Secret Service. I have had Bond movie arguments with coworkers and friends, and they always think I am just saying I like that one because it's obscure, but Lazenby really nails the role.

Anyway, $350 is about $330 more than I am willing to spend on action movies I have already seen.
 

AMUSIX

Member
For christmas I bougnt myself this:
ytOOVXW.jpg


inside, there are lots of great pages like these:
dejLvsS.jpg



Been going through it, movie by movie. Each prompting me to watch the film again, and go through the commentaries and extras. And, yes, it includes Casino Royale and Never Say Never.


I'd highly recommend the book if you're a major Bond fan. A ton of great images, and some cool info on the making of the films. I especially like the discussions of story development.
 

Kazerei

Banned
I bought the Bond 50 Collection back during a Black Friday sale and so far I've re-watched the first 14 films. I've watched most the Bond films at some time in my life, but I'd forgotten about some of the pop culture references that originated in the early films, and it's a really neat experience to go through them in order. In the Connery era, the production values just kept getting bigger and better. Lazenby was a stiff actor, but he was more attractive and more physical than Connery. Roger Moore is still my favorite though. He's not as rough and manly as the others, but he does great facial expressions and plays a more sophisticated Bond. Or maybe's it's because a few of my favorite movies are from his era. I've never watched either of the Timothy Dalton movies, so I'm looking forward to that.
 

Rich!

Member
Haha. I've just finished my second runthrough of the films on Blu Ray since I got the set in October.

Giving it a break for a while. Enjoy, GAF. Diamonds Are Forever, TMWTGG, AVTAK and Die Another Day are true masterpieces.
 

Blader

Member
I think that Bond fans REALLY overrate OHMSS, and I wish I hadn't gone into it knowing that so many others around here (Solo, Ignatz Mouse, etc.) place it so highly in the canon. It's a solid movie, there are some interesting deviations from the Bond formula (e.g. Tracy), and I really dug the whole third act (for the most part). But tonally it's really bizarre, and nothing about it really gels together -- it flits from romance to farce to action movie and never really gets its bearings for more than 10 minutes at a time. Bond/Tracy relationship is really undercooked to sell it as why she, of all the Bond girls, would be the one he'd want to marry (compared to Bond/Vesper, which is handled basically perfectly). The ending also really pissed me off, because the final Bond/Blofeld fight is ridiculous, especially with how it ends
Bond sticks him in a tree, then just walks away to get a drink, what in the fuck.

I also don't like Lazenby's Bond; he's a great physicaity but I never really bought his personality as Bond, and all the obvious callbacks to prior movies didn't help either.
 

Pachinko

Member
Shame about the OP being banned for silliness elsewhere but I can't see that it's more then a 24 hour "warning shot", there have been some policy changes at gaf in the last 2 months that people should pay more attention towards.

I was super excited to buy the bond 50 when it first came out but best buy did that thing where they advertise an awesome low price and fail to put any product out on release day, then conveniently have tons available 1 day after the sale is over. :(

Then I ended up watching skyfall and got disappointed enough by it that I didn't care about bond 50 anymore. After much though; however, I decided skyfall wasn't to bad at all but still don't really want to spend 150 bucks or whatever on bond 50. I like my movies to have individual cases (stupid reasoning I know).
 

Solo

Member
Godspeed to anyone doing this. I won't be doing it right now. I'm thinking next fall/winter will be my next Bond rewatch.
 
I'm going through the films now, but not in order. I finished Thunderball last night and enjoyed it. That last underwater fight scene dragged, though. Overall, of the Connery-Bonds I've seen, I'd rank it below From Russia with Love and above You Only Live Twice. I'm waiting until I've finished every film before making a top list. I think I've got about eight films left to watch.
 

Chinner

Banned
currently up to Thunderball, so far i'd rank it.

1. FRWL
2. Goldfinger
3. Thunderball
4. Dr.No

Dr. No: Pretty decent but it's quite slow. The beginning with the three blind mice has not aged well at all. Once the film picks it up its pretty decent, although it does feel it ends suddenly. I'm not sure what else to say, it was okay but didn't leave a big impression on me.

FRWL: Great cold war thriller with a detailed plot and characters. The beginning is a bit slow, but it's not wasted as it successfully establishes the rest of the film. Action sequences are great with the gypsy camp shoot-out and the train fight scene. I like that the film keeps moving and that a decent portion is set on the train, as they portray the paranoia of getting caught well. I like the Bond girl as they elaborate her character and seems somewhat believable that she'd swap sides.

Goldfinger: Good film but you can tell where some of the Bond cliches are starting to develop. I find Pussy Galore (and her flying blondes) to be a little weak, and Bond getting her to swap sides by effectively raping was kind iffy by today's standards (unless I've missed something). However, I really like Goldfinger. He's not a big super villain, and that's why I like him. At first he seems like anybody else, appearing to be somewhat weak and easy to deceive, but as the film unwraps he becomes more competent and I like that he's basically in the film from start to finish and you can see how he's deceiving. The fight with Oddjob is great, and he's a strong henchman character.

Thunderball: An okay film which is ruined by its inconsistency. At it's highest points, I think it's got something going for it - I like the opening sequence, being able to see the double 0 agents and Bond's meeting with Largo in his mansion, but at it's worst it's pretty boring and slow which is basically the underwater sequences. The Bond cliches are getting a little more crazy, with Bond bribing a woman into sex so she can keep his job, and the jetpack which makes the film seem a little more out there compared to Goldfinger and especially FRWL.
 

Sallokin

Member
I did a rewatch of all the movies in order prior to Skyfall. I hadn't seen a lot of them since I was a kid and boy have my opinions changed as I've gotten older.

Favorite Bond Movie - From Russia With Love

Least Favorite - Live and Let Die

For christmas I bougnt myself this:
ytOOVXW.jpg


inside, there are lots of great pages like these:
dejLvsS.jpg



Been going through it, movie by movie. Each prompting me to watch the film again, and go through the commentaries and extras. And, yes, it includes Casino Royale and Never Say Never.


I'd highly recommend the book if you're a major Bond fan. A ton of great images, and some cool info on the making of the films. I especially like the discussions of story development.

This book is definitely worth it. I would also recommend the "Bond on Set" books by Greg Williams.
 

destrudo

Member
I think that Bond fans REALLY overrate OHMSS, and I wish I hadn't gone into it knowing that so many others around here (Solo, Ignatz Mouse, etc.) place it so highly in the canon. It's a solid movie, there are some interesting deviations from the Bond formula (e.g. Tracy), and I really dug the whole third act (for the most part). But tonally it's really bizarre, and nothing about it really gels together -- it flits from romance to farce to action movie and never really gets its bearings for more than 10 minutes at a time. Bond/Tracy relationship is really undercooked to sell it as why she, of all the Bond girls, would be the one he'd want to marry (compared to Bond/Vesper, which is handled basically perfectly). The ending also really pissed me off, because the final Bond/Blofeld fight is ridiculous, especially with how it ends
Bond sticks him in a tree, then just walks away to get a drink, what in the fuck.

I also don't like Lazenby's Bond; he's a great physicaity but I never really bought his personality as Bond, and all the obvious callbacks to prior movies didn't help either.

I don't know why others like OHMSS but the reason it's my favorite of the classic movies is because James Bond didn't feel as much like a caricature, it felt more serious than the others, and the plot had consequences. It feels very different than what came before it, and so it stands out. When I did a marathon of the whole series not that long ago, it felt like a breath of fresh air after Connery's Bond. It's still a very shallow movie, like the others, but it feels less shallow, lol. But like you already mentioned, the movie has a ton of problems.

As for the OP, I'll be interested to see if you can make it through the Roger Moore films. I've marathoned all the films 3 times, and each time I get to his movies it starts to feeling like a chore.
 

Blader

Member
I don't know why others like OHMSS but the reason it's my favorite of the classic movies is because James Bond didn't feel as much like a caricature, it felt more serious than the others, and the plot had consequences. It feels very different than what came before it, and so it stands out. When I did a marathon of the whole series not that long ago, it felt like a breath of fresh air after Connery's Bond. It's still a very shallow movie, like the others, but it feels less shallow, lol. But like you already mentioned, the movie has a ton of problems.

As for the OP, I'll be interested to see if you can make it through the Roger Moore films. I've marathoned all the films 3 times, and each time I get to his movies it starts to feeling like a chore.

Yeah, at times OHMSS feels very serious and proto-Craig, but it also feels very silly at other times (like Blofeld's whole master plan, for example. or anything to do with Blofeld really). Goldfinger and Thunderball are overall sillier movies than OHMSS, but also feel like just stronger spy adventure movies too; they have more of a consistency to them, imo.
 
6067.jpg


(first time watch)

Diamonds are Forever

This one is directed by Guy Hamilton, who prior made his debut with Goldfinger. Between that and obviously seeing Connery returned, I wasn't too optimistic about what I would be getting here...

Oh boy :(

This is hands down, the worst Bond film I've seen thus far. Yeah, I know I know, I got shit like Moonraker and Man with the Golden Gun to long forward to, but obviously we're not there yet.
Thankfully I'm not alone as doing some casual research, you'll find the general reception to this one is pretty weak anyway.
Sean Connery looks like he's bored the entire time (clearly collecting a paycheck, of which was indeed quite large at the time). Physically he's let himself go even more since You only live Twice. Yeah I know, this is a bit of a shallow observation but it's still pretty jarring going from strapping young George L. back to middle-age pudgy Connery, who clearly doesn't appear concerned with looking physically imposing.
They, whether purposely or not, dialed up the camp factor considerably here and there are moments where I was just in awe of the film's callow, meandering attitude. Shit just happens and people look like they don't necessarily know where this is going next.
Blofeld returns in probably he's weakest stint, now sporting a full head of hair, being played by Charles Grey, who already played another character in You Only Live Twice. It all just comes off as lazy. Then there's this middle bit in the Casino where they're running around that just goes on and on. All it does is highlight's just how ugly the setting of Vegas for this film really was. We do get an inspired car chase around the middle, but once again they get lazy here as the pivitol moment where the vehicle hits two wheels to squeeze through an alley, only to come out the other side on the wrong two sets of wheels! Watching the "Inside -insert bond film-" Making-Of (these are damn excellent btw!) reveals that they essentially couldn't recreate the stunt with a different crew and ended up lazily throwing a car interior shot where the car impossibly flips to it's other side just before exiting said tight alley. It's duuuumb and makes no sense. Still, Guy Hamilton really shows his action chops here and you'll get to see it even more with Live or Let Die.
There's only a couple of positives... Literally just two I can honestly think of lol. The characters of Mr. Wint and Mr. Kidd hold up really well and come off as surprisingly cool. They even manage to casually throw in the fact that they're indeed lovers, very tastefully.
Also, we get an honestly well staged elevator fight that is probably the best action in the whole picture
Oh and of course, there's Bambi and Thumper ...you'll see (>__<)

This movie ....ugh

2 out of 5
 
As for the OP, I'll be interested to see if you can make it through the Roger Moore films. I've marathoned all the films 3 times, and each time I get to his movies it starts to feeling like a chore.

Yeah man, I've always been scared of those films but just watched Live or Let Die the other night and was pleasantly surprised. Will be posting that soon.
 
(First time watch)

11529.jpg


Live and Let Die

Fearing the worst for the forth coming Roger Moore era, this one was a damn pleasant surprise!
Right off the bat, the opening accompanied with the in your face credit montage/Paul McCartney's theme (which gets replayed a bit way too much later on), comes off as completely un-Bond up to that point. I was immediately into it. From then on, the film (once again directed by Guy Hamilton) feels like it's going out of it's way to distance itself from the Connery era. While you'll never confuse Roger Moore with a bruiser, he still brings a degree sophistication to the proceedings.
Like Moonraker was a response to Star Wars, this is a response to the rise of Blaxploitation. We even get a Honkey line thrown in there at some point. Still, it eventually get's past that and establishes it's own identity.
The plot ultimately becomes simple enough, but like alot of other Bond films in the early era I've found, it's drawn out for way to fucking long. The film is 2 hours and you feel almost every minute of it unfortunately.
Once again, Guy Hamilton, when given the right material, shows his chops with staging action. The boat chase in particular still holds up remarkablely well. One observation I've made to my wife repeatedly is that I truly appreciate whoever's choice it is to almost always leave the score absent for large portions of the action scenes. Too many films nowadays will just constantly feed that shit into a scene and alot of time, it's just too much. Like say Anakin Vs Obi-Wan in RotS.
Regarding the Bond girls, we get our first black one, which is once again, one of the films' strengths. It constantly insists on being progressive all around and different. Unfortunately the girl can't act for shit though. Dr. Quinn Medicine Woman Jane Seymour is, quite honestly, stunning.
Aside from the hilarious death for the villain and the fucking awful Sheriff that almost completely ruins a certain scene in the movie, this film is damn good and certainly put me in a positive frame of mind
Also, it has probably one of my favorite last shots in any Bond film (spoilers obviously)

4 out of 5

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(First time watch)

pp32849-james-bond-golden-gun-poster.jpg


The Man with the Golden Gun

Oh ...god

Just when you thought things were safe, we get this POS
I guess it's widely considered to be the low point for the series (and not in a Die Another Die, ironic way) and it shows.
This film is fucking awful on sooo many levels. I'll start with the good though, which isn't much
Basically we get some wonderful on-location shooting and... well, yeah, that's it really
Whether it was the writers, producers, or whoever, I don't know, but basically after having established a great tone with Live and Let Die, they (once again) go back to playing up the absurd and camp. Take for instance, this stunt. Inspired stuff, but who the fuck made that last call?
Which of course eventually leads to this escape ....I don't even know what to say. I mean it's funny as shit, but was that what they were going for?
Christopher Lee, while turning in a good performance, is completely unintimidating. We're told he's the deadliest assassin in the world ...just because.
Then we get Nick Nack, played by Hervé Jean-Pierre Villechaize. I don't know what they wanted to do with this character either. Make fun of him? Laugh with him? It's borderline exploitative. Guess the dude killed himself in the 90s, which still bummed me out =(

Anyway, yeah, this one is a watch merely out of either obligation or curiousity... or as a comedy that you laugh at, not with.

1 out of 5
 
I've been meaning to getting around and watch the old Bond films. I am particularly interested in On Her Majesty's Secret Service, since a lot of people say it's one of the best.

Rotten tomatoes did an article about watching all the Bond films for the first time. Might be interesting to compare notes.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/dr_no/news/1775385/bonding_with_bond_day_1_dr_no/

thanks!

And yeah, other than the weird tone sometimes through out and a slow middle, OHMSS is S-Rank Bond
 
I also feel it's my obligation to address something else I've picked up on with just two of the Roger Moore films thus far

Dude is like, reaaaally rapey at times. Basically within 5 minutes of any women he seemingly meets, he asserts himself, wraps his arm around her back and proceeds to awkwardly thrust his mouth into her's ....I, think they're kissing? I'm not sure =/
 

Carlisle

Member
Watched the first two with a couple buddies (fellow gaffer Ourobolus!) a couple weeks back. Gotta see the rest.

60's girls are so damn hot.
 
Watched the first two with a couple buddies (fellow gaffer Ourobolus!) a couple weeks back. Gotta see the rest.

60's girls are so damn hot.

You have no idea

Such a wonderful era where women looked like, you know, women, and not pencils

Also, dem gypsies!
 
I didn't like Live and Let Die. Maybe it's because I read the book first. Also, I absolutely loath J.W. Pepper.

He is one of the worst characters ever conceived in film. I'm glad he was only in two of the Bond films, neither of which were very good.
 
I didn't like Live and Let Die. Maybe it's because I read the book first. Also, I absolutely loath J.W. Pepper.

He is one of the worst characters ever conceived in film. I'm glad he was only in two of the Bond films, neither of which were very good.

He's actually got some good dialog though. They just milk the character and he completely overdoes it
 
I have to disagree. Nothing coming out of that face-hole was good. Also, that boat chase went on for far too long, and he didn't make it any better. I really, really hate that character.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom