abstract alien
Member
Its always going to be personal, some just deal with it in different ways.agrajag said:This is a sport. Why should they take things personal?
Its always going to be personal, some just deal with it in different ways.agrajag said:This is a sport. Why should they take things personal?
Boogie said:Ya, but GSP isn't a heavyweight.
Name a heavyweight with a better resume of opponents, who's never lost.
agrajag said:This is a sport. Why should they take things personal?
mujun said:So he get's it easier because their are less worthy people in his weight class. Cool, some crappy LHW should put on 100 kgs, fight in a league with super heavy weight and be king of the universe.
When thinking about pound for pound best in the world you need to consider recent performance vs overall performance, finished fights vs decisions, calibre of opponents, etc.
Seems like you need to consider a few more elements before you make your call.
Boogie said:Funnily enough, we weren't talking about Pound for Pound. In fact, in the exchange that started this argument you conceded him as "Pound for pound one of the best if not the best in the world, sure, unbeatable, no".
There is no point in criticizing Fedor's record as a heavyweight if no other heavyweight on Earth has a record that can compare to his.
You can't criticize the quality of his opposition, if no other heavyweight has a better list of defeated opponents. Anybody whose own list might compare (say, perhaps, Nog, Crocop, Barnett, Sylvia) has already lost to Fedor, or will shortly (Barnett).
This seems pretty intuitive to me.
If we're talking pound for pound, then sure, by all means, compare records across weight classes. But that wasn't brought up in our exchange originally.
I made a specific request, which, I assume, you are unable to do, from your sidestepping of it.
Fedor is not a "darling." Fedor is the King of MMA.
Point is, he isn't invincible. Pound for pound one of the best if not the best in the world, sure. Unbeatable, no.
Brian Fellows said:I never said they should.
But they shouldn't be trying to sell their fight with fake animosity either because I don't give a shit and it's insulting to my intelligence.
Don't say a bunch of stupid prickish things in the first place and you won't have to take them back. If you're going to say shit mean and stick with it like Brock did.
agrajag said:Uh, ok. Let's take the Brock/Mir fight for example. What has Mir said before/after the fight that he had to take back?
Mr. Sam said:That he'd win?
agrajag said:Uh, ok. Let's take the Brock/Mir fight for example. What has Mir said before/after the fight that he had to take back?
Kabuki Waq said:did you miss the whole countdown show where he made is training partner pretend to be brock and knock him out with one punch :lol
or when he mocked brock punches comparing them to his sister pulling his hair?
or when he mocked Brocks training and skills?
http://www.ufc.com/index.cfm?fa=VideoPlayer.home&gid=21005DKehoe said:Is that on youtube? I have heard about it but not been able to see it anywhere. I was explaining to my friend yesterday why Brock didn't touch gloves at the start and was trying to find a video of that.
agrajag said:So every fighter has to go into a fight not thinking they'd win? Let's not be ridiculous.
Kabuki Waq said:did you miss the whole countdown show where he made is training partner pretend to be brock and knock him out with one punch :lol
or when he mocked brock punches comparing them to his sister pulling his hair?
or when he mocked Brocks training and skills?
mujun said:This is how it started:
And then you continued to argue he was unbeatable. That is the point I'm arguing. I never brought up heavyweight, you did. I just checked my posts and make no mention of it being purely a heavyweight discussion.
Boogie said:Kay.
But he is the King of MMA.
Right. Because, right now, empirical evidence is that he is unbeatable. He has never been beaten. He has beaten everyone that has been put in front of him. And that resume is the best resume that exists at heavyweight. Hence, King of MMA.
Maybe so.MrOctober said:Are people arguing that Fedor isn't the king just for the sake of arguing?
MrOctober said:Are people arguing that Fedor isn't the king just for the sake of arguing?
Lmao Mir had every bit of that ass whooping and post fight rape coming.alr1ghtstart said:
Boogie said:Right. Because, right now, empirical evidence is that he is unbeatable.
Sinatar said:I think it's just a case of newer MMA fans who are unfamiliar with Fedor not willing to admit their lack of knowledge. Anyone who had followed his career wouldn't even attempt to debate it.
Sinatar said:I think it's just a case of newer MMA fans who are unfamiliar with Fedor not willing to admit their lack of knowledge. Anyone who had followed his career wouldn't even attempt to debate it.
Sinatar said:I think it's just a case of newer MMA fans who are unfamiliar with Fedor not willing to admit their lack of knowledge. Anyone who had followed his career wouldn't even attempt to debate it.
mujun said:I've seen every one of his fights and while I agree he is a probably the pound for pound the best in the world I wouldn't call him the king of MMA. That is subjective, don't try and pass it off as anything otherwise.
MrOctober said:I can't imagine how you could question it.
Hmmmm. To be completely honest, Im not familiar with him in any way outside of his ring destruction. Im interested to know more of what he means exactly. Is he a really grounded guy? It seems so from this snippet.EviLore said:http://www.m-1global.com/lang/en/20...-rutten-i-dont-think-youll-see-me-in-the-ufc/
Interesting new Bas interview with Fedor. Doesn't care at all about building his legacy and just wants to be remembered as a good person. Considers MMA to be 100% a mental game. Says Mirko, Nog, and Arlovski were his toughest or most interesting fights. Says he doesn't watch many MMA matches, and has mainly just been watching Barnett's fights recently. Says that Brock would be an interesting opponent for him but that he doesn't think the UFC is in his future, with the terms they insist on and the manner in which they approach him.
When he says that being friends with Barnett isn't going to interfere with the fight, holy shit do I believe him!
Boogie said:That doesn't make a gawdamned lick of sense. Fedor being pound for pound the best in the world is arguable and subjective, based upon the nature of "pound for pound" lists.
Him being the King of MMA is not subjective. In fact, it is the least subjective statement that can be made in MMA. Fedor is the undisputed, unbeaten, Heavyweight champion of the world in MMA. What else could the title "King of MMA" refer to, other than that?
Boogie said:Him being the King of MMA is not subjective. In fact, it is the least subjective statement that can be made in MMA. Fedor is the undisputed, unbeaten, Heavyweight champion of the world in MMA. What else could the title "King of MMA" refer to, other than that?
mujun said:Sorry I didn't realize that "the King of MMA" could only be held by a heavyweight. My bad, you win.
mujun said:Sorry I didn't realize that "the King of MMA" could only be held by a heavyweight. My bad, you win.
For one thing Fedor sees competing in Sambo as a source of national pride, UFC doesn't want let their fighters compete in anything other than the UFC. Not to mention they could drop him at anytime, for whatever reason, but if he were to be the champ he's basically stuck in his contract which would auto-renew.abstract alien said:Hmmmm. To be completely honest, Im not familiar with him in any way outside of his ring destruction. Im interested to know more of what he means exactly. Is he a really grounded guy? It seems so from this snippet.
abstract alien said:Hmmmm. To be completely honest, Im not familiar with him in any way outside of his ring destruction. Im interested to know more of what he means exactly. Is he a really grounded guy? It seems so from this snippet.
Boogie said:Well, duh. It pretty much means that he is, objectively, the best fighter in the world. The "King", you might say. That's why weight classes exist. Because for however awesome GSP is, he would not win against Fedor. Because if he could beat Fedor, he wouldn't be fighting at 170lbs.
I don't know how you're not getting this.
So pound for pound doesn't mean king? :Omujun said:I hope that wasn't aimed at me. I've been watching MMA since I first came to Japan in 97. I've watched every UFC, Pride, Sengoku, Dream and most of the other major stuff like Strikeforce, Cage Rage, etc.
I've seen every one of his fights and while I agree he is a probably the pound for pound the best in the world I wouldn't call him the king of MMA. That is subjective, don't try and pass it off as anything otherwise.
ManiacMX said:Check out this Fedor video.....http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVVrNOQtlzY
mujun said:Okay, now you are in my books coming across as very ignorant. Each weight class should be considered separately from each other weight class.
Are you honestly trying to tell me that if somehow Hong Man Choi became the heavyweight champ with his record and skills and then someone like Torres down at bantamweight had a record of 80 wins to 1 loss (his real record by the way is better than Fedor's, he's at 37-1) that Choi would still be the "King of MMA"?