Support NeoGAF

[Bam Bam Baklava]

Man, this topic.



Good post.



Bad post.

Maybe you should read the thread before making these two word judgements that don't mean shit. We have data, you have what?

 

[prag16]

Maybe you should read the thread before making these two word judgements that don't mean shit. We have data, you have what?

I did. You act like there's unanimous agreement on your "everything is rosy" assessment. There's not. Maybe it's you who have not read the thread. Plenty of people recognize the matter is much more complicated. Others just want this to be an Obama love fest circle jerk topic.

 

[Bam Bam Baklava]

I did. You act like there's unanimous agreement on your "everything is rosy" assessment. There's not. Maybe it's you who have not read the thread. Plenty of people recognize the matter is much more complicated. Others just want this to be an Obama love fest circle jerk topic.

So you've offered nothing and you're telling me to read the thread because I disagree with your shitty drive by post?

From what I can tell of this thread, which you clearly have not read, the people who are posting substantive analysis are people who see this report for what it is and not the people talking about conspiratorial number massaging or labor force participation rates that were always projected to decline regardless of what happens in the economy.

Why don't you tell us what this is really about?