Can I just say that in regards to May's statement today of the UK coming together....fuck that :/
I have to admit, amongst all the other stuff that is happening right now, I keep forgetting that Brexit is a thing.
Can I just say that in regards to May's statement today of the UK coming together....fuck that :/
I have to admit, amongst all the other stuff that is happening right now, I keep forgetting that Brexit is a thing.
Ancient Remainer proverb said:We tried to tell you lot
Britain set to lose EU crown jewels of banking and medicine agencies
Not suprising but the EU is moving quick.
Also "humiliation"? What did people expect.
The country IS coming together... assuming you're willing to ignore the vote of almost half of its voting population.Why even bother with this bollocks?
Britain set to lose EU crown jewels of banking and medicine agencies
Not suprising but the EU is moving quick.
Also "humiliation"? What did people expect.
Which is the scary part - imagine how much shit is going to get unreported with the bluster of the Second Korean War? Too much already gets lost with the coverage of Trump's tweets...
A tax haven on the EU border is the most likely outcome . I don't see that the UK government has any other option tbh.
The decision to leave the EU is going to hurt the younger generation a lot , but hopefully in a couple of decades things will rebalance.
Nursing is one of the most intensive degrees out there at the moment which leads you to a difficult, stressful and underpaid career.
I mean I know our Government are a bunch of incompetents but literally everyone knew that removing the bursary's would severely damage nursing numbers but they still went through with it.
Britain set to lose EU crown jewels of banking and medicine agencies
Not suprising but the EU is moving quick.
Also "humiliation"? What did people expect.
EU dipshits gonna cause what they want to prevent. Idiots.
No, because EU had the decision. They chose poorly.Quite clearly it was the other way around. Only the most deluded could possibly read that as otherwise.
No, because EU had the decision. They chose poorly.
UK want a situation that benefits both, EU chooses one that is exactly what EU don't want. UK has no fault here, EU doing same shit that caused Brexit in first place, they wont learn.
EU dipshits gonna cause what they want to prevent. Idiots.
No, because EU had the decision. They chose poorly.
UK want a situation that benefits both, EU chooses one that is exactly what EU don't want. UK has no fault here, EU doing same shit that caused Brexit in first place, they wont learn.
Seriously?
Great sarcasm.
When the entire strategy of the leave campaign was racism and the delusion that voting for leave would destabilize the EU and force them to give the UK whatever they want.
Same old nonsense. Calling people racist when they aren't doesn't win them over, it just makes them do exactly what you don't want them to. Just like EU is doing now to UK.
A reminder of reality if EU doesn't do what best for all is no threat, but a promise.Threats seem to work...oh wait, they don't.
A reminder of reality if EU doesn't do what best for all is no threat, but a promise.
I felt my previous comment didn't do enough to address the stupidity of that stance.Lol at you editing in a potshot. Enjoy your points, winner!
No, because EU had the decision. They chose poorly.
UK want a situation that benefits both, EU chooses one that is exactly what EU don't want. UK has no fault here, EU doing same shit that caused Brexit in first place, they wont learn.
You mean acting like a witless troll is going to get the EU to go along?
UK forced to be low tax haven will be the result of a bad deal, UK know this, EU know this..
UK forced to be low tax haven will be the result of a bad deal, UK know this, EU know this.
Is quite hypocritical of posters in this thread repeatedly​ saying "X is result of Brexit, you know it would happen, you had a choice", then when EU makes a choice where it knows the outcome, it not the EU fault.
But that's this thread all over, hypocrisy everywhere because still bitter about that Brexit loss.
Clearly nobody is forcing the UK to do anything
What's so bad about being a tax haven? Sure everyone below the top rate will get utterly fucked but I'll be alright. For what it's worth the UK couldn't find a welfare state for 65m by being a tax haven so the added benefit is that the death rate amongst the leavers will tick up. Silver linings.
And you call others witless. So you expect UK to let EU fuck it and do nothing to respond?
UK forced to be low tax haven will be the result of a bad deal, UK know this, EU know this.
Is quite hypocritical of posters in this thread repeatedly​ saying "X is result of Brexit, you know it would happen, you had a choice", then when EU makes a choice where it knows the outcome, it not the EU fault.
But that's this thread all over, hypocrisy everywhere because still bitter about that Brexit loss.
Calling death of people something good. You're a vile little person.
And you call others witless. So you expect UK to let EU fuck it and do nothing to respond?
No, you called. Don't try wiggle out of it.Oh I'm not calling for anything. You did it to yourselves.
Remember that.
the added benefit is that the death rate amongst the leavers will tick up. Silver linings.
No, because EU had the decision. They chose poorly.
UK want a situation that benefits both, EU chooses one that is exactly what EU don't want. UK has no fault here, EU doing same shit that caused Brexit in first place, they wont learn.
Ucchedavāda;234034818 said:Early trade talks aside, does it make any sense at all for those two agencies to be located outside of the EU?
lol @ the bolded
What he really means is "UK wants all the benefits without FOM and paying into EU"
No, you called. Don't try wiggle out of it.
Want it quoted again?
So according to you people dying is a "benefit" and "silver lining".
Disgusting.
That the agencies would leave the UK was always fact. The only semi surprising thing is the pace the EU operates in that regard.
The consulting firm Deloitte, meanwhile, told the subcommittee that the UK has three options: ”It could either continue to align with the EMA (particularly given the ‘potential disadvantages of losing mutual recognition with the EU'), align with another regulatory framework (such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), or ‘create a new/enhanced UK regulatory body'. Aligning with another regulatory body such as the FDA might be ‘time-consuming and costly', while the ‘size and complexity' of the task of creating a new regulatory body and supporting a new regulatory framework meant that this was ‘unlikely to be feasible in the time available.'
But we can't stay in the EMA, because that would mean the CJEU would continue to have jurisdiction, so we're probably going to be the slightly silly position of simply copying the EMA's regulatory framework with absolutely no say. Of course this would mean that drugs certified in the EU market would be acceptable here, but not the other way around.
In what way does the CJEU interact with the EMA, is this just regulatory enforcement or something more?
The European Medical Agency makes EU law through delegated powers. If a point is unclear or contested, the CJEU issues a definitive ruling stating what exactly the nature of the law is.
Then surely all the UK would need to do is shadow any ruling on these matters. They'd effectively be under CJEU law, just not its jurisdiction.
Your last sentence is a contradiction. Having to abide by a particular body's legal pronouncements is the same as being under that body's jurisdiction. If you are signed up to the EMA, you are under CJEU jurisdiction.