• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The Witcher 2: Performance Thread [Enhanced Edition Patch - New content & 100+ fixes]

LiquidMetal14

hide your water-based mammals
Gonna try uber with my overclock enabled now CPU wise. Was getting like 11fps in the first scene before but that was without CPU OC'd.
 
Binabik15 said:
Any tipps or tutorials for OCing a 5850? Only thing I did after getting one was setting the CCC sliders to the max.

CCC gives you a very safe overclock (50 core and 125 memory iirc). You'll want to download MSI Afterburner, it's a pretty nifty tool for OCing and what I assume most people use.

I'll PM you the rest (it's a bit off topic), if you have any questions ask in the I need a new PC thread.
 
toasty_T said:
CCC gives you a very safe overclock (50 core and 125 memory iirc). You'll want to download MSI Afterburner, it's a pretty nifty tool for OCing and what I assume most people use.

I'll PM you the rest (it's a bit off topic), if you have any questions ask in the I need a new PC thread.

I Got an MSI GTX 460 1GB Cyclone. I assume its easy to overclock using that tool? I never overclocked my hardware before. Kinda scares me.
 

Minsc

Gold Member
PERFORMANCE v1.0
Ultra:

Conflict NZ said:
CPU: i7-950 @ 4.0ghz
GPU: GTX 580 OC 900Mhz
Resolution: 1920x1200
Framerate: 28 fps
Corky said:
CPU: 2600 @ 4.6ghz
GPU: 560 ti sli oc 900mhz
Resolution: 1920x1080
Location (of test): intro cutscene
Framerate: 15-25 fps
Corto said:
CPU: i7 870 @ 2.93 Ghz
GPU: GTX 570
Resolution: 1920x1080
Location (of test): Dragon escape
Framerate: 15-20 fps
Hawk269 said:
CPU: 2600k OC to 4.5ghz
GPU: 2xSLI 580's OC to 875
Location (of test): In-game
Framerate: 20-25 fps
LastWindow said:
CPU: 2500k @ 3.3GHZ
GPU: GTX 570
Resolution: 1920x1080
Framerate: < 20 fps
LiquidMetal14 said:
CPU: 2500k @ 4.5GHZ
GPU: 6970 w/ max overclock
Resolution: 1920x1080
Location (of test): cutscenes
Framerate: 18-45 fps, averaging upper 20s
L0st Id3ntity said:
CPU: i7 930 @ 4.0ghz
GPU: 480x2
Resolution: 2560x1600
Location (of test): opening
Framerate: 15 fps
Minsc said:
CPU: i7@3.3 Ghz
GPU: HD 5870
Resolution: 1920x1080
Location (of test): intro cutscenes
Framerate: ~15fps
toasty_T said:
CPU: Q6600 @ 3.2GHz
GPU: 5850 @ 850/1200
Resolution: 1680x1050
Location (of test): Prologue (few areas)
Framerate: 10-20 fps
Blimblim said:
CPU: i7 @ 3.3 Ghz
GPU: GTX 570
Resolution: 1920x1080
Framerate: Far from smooth

Ultra (uber off):

BigBlackGamer said:
GPU: 6970
Framerate: 40-50 fps
Framerate: 70-80 fps on in-game cut scenes
ColonialRaptor said:
GPU: 5970 w/ Crossfire
Framerate: 60 fps locked
Custom Settings: Using Radeon Pro
Corky said:
CPU: 2600 @ 4.6ghz
GPU: 560 ti sli oc 900mhz
Resolution: 1920x1080
Location (of test): intro cutscene
Framerate: 40-50 fps
Corto said:
CPU: i7 870 @ 2.93 Ghz
GPU: GTX 570
Resolution: 1920x1080
Location (of test): Dragon escape
Framerate: 40-60 fps
dino1980 said:
CPU: i5-2500K OC 4.2GHz
GPU: Radeon 6970
Resolution: 1600x900
Framerate: 50-60 fps
epmode said:
GPU: GTX 570
Resolution: 2560x1600
Framerate: 30 fps
ExMachina said:
CPU: i5 2500k @ 4.5GHz
GPU: 1GB GTX 460 (OCed to 850/1700/2100)
Resolution: 1920x1080
Location (of test): Prologue
Framerate: 30-60 fps gameplay, 15-30 fps cutscenes
Custom Settings: Motion blur and cinematic DoF disabled
Gully State said:
CPU: Q9550
GPU: 5850
Framerate: 30 fps
Hawk269 said:
CPU: 2600k OC to 4.5ghz
GPU: 2xSLI 580's OC to 875
Location (of test): In-game
Framerate: 55 fps
Hulud said:
GPU: GTX 460 1gb OC'd
Resolution: 1440x900
Location (of test): outdoors part with the trebuchets
Framerate: 40-60 fps
Custom Settings: SSAO off
I NEED SCISSORS said:
CPU: Phenom ii X2 @ 3.6ghz
GPU: Radeon 4890
Resolution: 1920x1080
Framerate: 20-30 fps
LastWindow said:
CPU: 2500k @ 3.3GHZ
GPU: GTX 570
Resolution: 1920x1080
Framerate: 40-60 fps
LiquidMetal14 said:
CPU: 2500k @ 4.5GHZ
GPU: 6970 w/ max overclock
Resolution: 1920x1080
Location (of test): cutscenes
Framerate: 60 fps
longdi said:
CPU: i7 3.8ghz
GPU: hd6970 2gb
Resolution: 1680x1050
Framerate: 50-60 fps with drops to ~42 fps in very heavy parts
L0st Id3ntity said:
CPU: i7 930 @ 4.0ghz
GPU: 480x2
Resolution: 2560x1600
Location (of test): opening
Framerate: 55 fps
Mohonky said:
CPU: Core I7 920
GPU: 1280MB GTX 750
Framerate: 30-45 fps
Minsc said:
CPU: i7@3.3 Ghz
GPU: HD 5870
Resolution: 1920x1080
Location (of test): start of prologue
Framerate: 40-60 fps
pahamrick said:
GPU: 5870x2 Crossfire
Location: Opening parts
Framerate: 60 fps
Custom Settings: 11.5a hotfix drivers and the latest CAP release
RadeonPro with all settings default with the CompatAFR-1x1.exe profile
remz said:
CPU: i7 sandy bridge 2600k @ 3.4ghz
GPU: GTX 570
Framerate: ~60 fps
sam27368 said:
CPU: i7 4.4ghz
GPU: GTX 570x2
Framerate: 40-60 fps
Revolutionary said:
CPU: i7 950 @ 4.0ghz
GPU: 6970 @ stock speeds
Resolution: 1920x1080
Location (of test): Entire Intro Area
Framerate: 45-60 fps
Salaadin said:
CPU: Intel i5 750 OCed 3.3Ghz
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5850 OCed to 760/1120
Resolution: 1920x1080
Location (of test): 1) In town. 2)During battle (up to 5 enemies on screen) 3) At a certain early overlook.
Framerate: 40-60 fps
Custom Settings: Catalyst 11.5a drivers.
-Texture Memory Budget set to very high
-Quality of Shadows set to medium
-Disabled all 3 DoF settings (gameplay, filmic, and cutscenes)
-Disabled SSAO
-Disabled Motion Blur
-Disabled Ubersampling
-Disabled Vsync and instead opted for d3doverrider.
Saren is Bad said:
CPU: 2600k (stock speed)
GPU: GTX 580 (new drivers)
Framerate: ~80 fps in opening cutscenes, 45-50 fps after walking out of the tent
Custom Settings: Bloom off, and Motion blur off, and SSAO off
Shahadan said:
CPU: i7 740QM @ 1.73 Ghz
GPU: GTX 460M
Resolution: 1920x1080
Framerate: 20 fps
Solo said:
CPU: i5 2500k
GPU: GTX 570
Resolution: 1920x1080
Framerate: 40-50 fps
TheExodu5 said:
CPU: i5 2500K @ 4.6GHz
GPU: 2x GTX 570
Resolution: 1920x1080
Framerate: 65 fps in cutscenes
80-100 fps during gameplay
30-40 fps with Ubersampling
Custom Settings: 16x AF, Custom SLI profile, 266.58 drivers (3D vision installed)
TheVampire said:
CPU: 3.8ghz core i7
GPU: 6970
Resolution: 1920x1080
Framerate: 30-50 fps
toasty_T said:
CPU: Q6600 @ 3.2GHz
GPU: 5850 @ 850/1200
Resolution: 1680x1050
Location (of test): Prologue in its entirety
Framerate: 30-60 fps, 30-40 fps outdoors and 50-60 fps indoors
Truant said:
GPU: GTX 295
Resolution: 1920x1080
Framerate: 25-35 fps
Vestal said:
CPU: E8400 OCed to 4GHZ
GPU: 5770 XFX Crossfire
Resolution: 1920x1080
Framerate: 40-70 fps
Custom Settings: Dirt2 profile with Alternate Frame Rendering
Shadow quality at medium and very large texture memory
vocab said:
CPU: i5 750
GPU: Radeon 5850
Location: Beginning area
Framerate: 30-40 fps
Zefah said:
CPU: i5 2500k @ 3.3ghz
GPU: 5870 1GB
Framerate: 40-60 fps, occassional dips to 30 fps
StudioTan said:
CPU: i5 2400
GPU: 560Ti
Framerate: Very good
Vlodril said:
CPU: Quad core at 2.6
GPU: ATI 6950
Framerate: 40-45 fps
WrikaWrek said:
GPU: GTX 470
Resolution: 1920x1080
Framerate: Runs good

High:

Alextended said:
CPU: Core 2 Duo @ 3.16 Ghz
GPU: GTX285
Resolution: 1280x720
Framerate: 30-60 fps in beginning, barely 30 outdoors later on
alisdair said:
CPU: i5 750
GPU: Radeon 6870
Framerate: < 25 fps
boundedseven said:
CPU: Intel i5 760@ 2.8GHz
GPU: GTX 460
Framerate: 30 fps
Custom Settings: Motion blur off and 275.27 drivers
Ceebs said:
CPU: Phenom X2 550
GPU: 1GB 4870
Resolution: 1440X900
Framerate: Quite playable
Custom Settings: SSAO off & Shadows on Medium
DaBuddaDa said:
CPU: i5 750 2.66GHz
GPU: XFX 6870 1gb
Resolution: 1680x1080
Framerate: 60 fps
Custom Settings: 11.5 Catalyst drivers
DangerStepp said:
CPU: i7 920
GPU: Radeon 6870
Location (of test): Training Area
Framerate: 40-50 fps
delirium said:
CPU: E6850
GPU: GTX 460
Resolution: 1920x1200
Framerate: 17-30 fps, averages ~25 fps
godhandiscen said:
CPU: Core i7 @ 3.8 GHz
GPU: SLI GTX580 OC'd
Framerate: 60 fps
Custom Settings: LOD Distance: Normal, Texture Memory Size: Large
GoncaloCCastro said:
CPU: C2Duo 8400 @ 3.3GHz
GPU: GTX 570
Resolution: 1920x1080
Framerate: 30 fps average (up to 60, very seldom dips to low 20s)
Custom Settings: SSAO off
JohngPR said:
CPU: 3.2 GHZ Phenom II X4 955
GPU: Radeon HD 5770
Framerate: 20-30 fps
Custom Settings: 25-40 fps with motion blur and SSAO off
lastplayed said:
GPU: 5770
Framerate: 25-30 fps
Manik said:
CPU: i7 920 @ 3.6ghz
GPU: GTX 295
Resolution: 1920x1080
Location (of test): Intro Area
Framerate: 30-45 fps
Custom Settings: 275.27 BETA Drivers
Minsc said:
CPU: i7@3.3 Ghz
GPU: HD 5870
Resolution: 1920x1080
Location (of test): intro cutscenes
Framerate: ~45fps
RS4- said:
CPU: Q6600 stock
GPU: 6950, 2GB stock
Resolution: 1920x1080
Framerate: 30 fps
Custom Settings: disabled: blur effects, gameplay DoF, ssao, cinematic DoF
Snuggler said:
GPU: GTX 460
Framerate: ~30 fps
bluedeviltron said:
CPU: i5 760 2.8ghz
GPU: HD4870 1gb
Framerate: Tolerable
En-ou said:
CPU: c2quad q6700
GPU: radeon 5770
Resolution: 1920x1080
Framerate: Rock solid fps
reptilescorpio said:
CPU: Q6600
GPU: 460GTX
Framerate: Solid
Tokubetsu said:
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 (3.0ghz)
GPU: ATI 4870x2
Resolution: 1600x900
Framerate: Decent
Technosteve said:
CPU: i7-920 @ 3.0 Gigahertz
GPU: 4890 1 gigabyte Vram@ 870 Megahertz
Resolution: 1920x1080
Framerate: 25-60 fps, averaging 30
Custom Settings: AA: Disabled, SSAO: Disabled, Cinematic DOF: Enabled

Medium:

MrOogieBoogie said:
CPU: Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 5600+ @ 2.9 GHz
GPU: ATI HD Radeon 4670 1GB
Resolution: 1280x800
Framerate: ~15 fps


Low:

Easy_D said:
CPU: Dual Core 3.16ghz
GPU: HD5870 1GB
Framerate: 23-70 fps
ManeKast said:
CPU: Core i7-2630QM
GPU: GTX 460M
Resolution:1280x720
Framerate: ~30+ fps, "OK"
Sportbilly said:
CPU: C2D E6750
GPU: 8800GT
Resolution: 1280x960
Framerate: 30-40 fps



RedSwirl said:
I'm not finding it in the GOG folder.

You should be able to download it from GOG directly, just go to "My Account" and you'll see your list of games, go to the downloads for TW2, and get the 2MB one from the top.

RedSwirl said:
I've still got nothing but all the CHUNK files.

My understanding is that means it's not done, or you may have moved it during the installation so they didn't get deleted. You could try sorting the folder by size and see if you have 2GB files.

Also you need to have restarted the downloader since last night to get the last of it.

I just used http downloading from my web browser, no problems.
 
EatChildren said:
Ubersampling will primarily increase the quality of texture filtering and anti aliasing. It renders the screen in a higher resolution, then downsamples it to your display resolution, maximising image quality.

Textures are not rendered at a native level, they're rendered at ~4x what you're seeing, so when displayed at your resolution they retain their original quality. Aliasing is removed simply because the aliasing that might be present in the 'full' image is cleaned out when it downsamples.

There's a noticable improvement, but it's not worth the giant performance hit 99% of people will be getting.

Ah, gotcha, thanks for the information.

RavenFox said:
Bud of mine on another forum put up some pics

http://forums.modojo.com/showpost.php?p=3518685&postcount=1

Holy Moly 0_0

I love how amazing it looks and these are just the beginner areas. Can't wait to see the rest of the game.
 

R0nn

Member
All ubersampling does is improve the AA and AF people, nothing more. That's why some textures seem sharper. It's caused by the uber AF.

Edit: beaten by EatChildren
 

Mashing

Member
Interested in how this would run on Q6600 w/ 5870, 4GB RAM.

Hmm, Toasty's specs are pretty similar, which is encouraging.
 

Geoff9920

Member
Sethos said:
My poor 5970, won't even use 50% of its power ... literally, damn Crossfire =P
Seriously. I'm gonna give the AFR profile solution posted by Pahamrick a shot when I get off work. (Thanks for mentioning this OP!)

Gotta say though, next single gpu card that gives me a 30% performance increase over my 5970 gets my money. This business of waiting for a game to be crossfire/sli optimized is getting old.
 

RedSwirl

Junior Member
Minsc said:
You should be able to download it from GOG directly, just go to "My Account" and you'll see your list of games, go to the downloads for TW2, and get the 2MB one from the top.



My understanding is that means it's not done, or you may have moved it during the installation so they didn't get deleted. You could try sorting the folder by size and see if you have 2GB files.

Also you need to have restarted the downloader since last night to get the last of it.

I just used http downloading from my web browser, no problems.

It says the setup file is corrupted. Downloading the whole thing again will take another five hours, and I need that time to finish TW1.

Anyway, after pre-loading the game I moved the files to another drive then moved the downloader's download location to the same spot. When I started it up again, it downloaded the entire game again (but I didn't see any change in that folder). I restarted it and then got the last parts.
 

Sethos

Banned
Geoff9920 said:
Gotta say though, next single gpu card that gives me a 30% performance increase over my 5970 gets my money. This business of waiting for a game to be crossfire/sli optimized is getting old.

Same here. I'm sick to death of waiting for profiles, suffering piss-poor performance and tons of graphical artifacts. I'm going single-GPU next time.

But let us know how it works out with the profile.
 

TheExodu5

Banned
I take it Ubersampling is basically supersampling? Anyone know what the degree of super sampling is? (2x horizontal? 2x vertical? Or both?).

I'll post results from my tests when I get home tonight.

LiquidMetal14 said:
Gonna try uber with my overclock enabled now CPU wise. Was getting like 11fps in the first scene before but that was without CPU OC'd.

I wouldn't expect to see any difference in performance. Supersampling is purely a GPU bound operation. Increasing the CPU clock would have no impact, as your GPU is the bottleneck in this case.

Sethos said:
Same here. I'm sick to death of waiting for profiles, suffering piss-poor performance and tons of graphical artifacts. I'm going single-GPU next time.

But let us know how it works out with the profile.

Same here. SLI is not worth it, unless you MUST have the added performance in a game where you know SLI will work. But otherwise, too many issues with games here and there makes it more of a pain than anything.
 

RedSwirl

Junior Member
RedSwirl said:
It says the setup file is corrupted. Downloading the whole thing again will take another five hours, and I need that time to finish TW1.

Anyway, after pre-loading the game I moved the files to another drive then moved the downloader's download location to the same spot. When I started it up again, it downloaded the entire game again (but I didn't see any change in that folder). I restarted it and then got the last parts.

Despite this it still says all the CHUNK files were last modified on the 10th.
 
AppleSmack said:
So...Anyone have any opinion on wether I should try overclocking on my MSI GTX 460 1gb cyclone? I never did it before.
Go for it. OC'ing your gpu is like very harmless and easy. You can easily revert if shit hits the fan.
 

LiquidMetal14

hide your water-based mammals
TheExodu5 said:
I wouldn't expect to see any difference in performance. Supersampling is purely a GPU bound operation. Increasing the CPU clock would have no impact, as your GPU is the bottleneck in this case.
.
I did see a noticeable increase. I will give uber 1 more run just for a screenshot or 2.

I was in the upper 40's on the highend before re-enabling my CPU OC. Now I was at 60 and above on ultra.

More tinkering to come.
 

gdt

Member
Can You Run It? says my 6770m fails even the minimun, but that shouldn't be dammit.

It also says I fail Crysis 2, but I know I can run that game, on high or whatever. Seen footage of that lol.
 

MrOogieBoogie

BioShock Infinite is like playing some homeless guy's vivid imagination
Guys, this game is destroying my PC.

AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 5600+ @ 2.9 GHz
ATI HD Radeon 4670 1GB
4GB DDR2 667 RAM

The game auto-detects to low settings. I've fumbled with the resolution (max: 1680x1050), bringing as far down as 1280x800, but nothing seems to help. In fact, I think I was getting better frames when selecting medium settings over low.

So, based off my specs, what advanced graphics options should I stay completely clear from? I don't know what a lot of them mean, like texture downscaling, texture memory, etc. Right now I'm average 15 fps no matter what I do it seems.

Thoughts?
 

TheExodu5

Banned
LiquidMetal14 said:
I did see a noticeable increase. I will give uber 1 more run just for a screenshot or 2.

I was in the upper 40's on the highend before re-enabling my CPU OC. Now I was at 60 and above on ultra.

More tinkering to come.

You're getting 60fps with uber on or off? I was saying that you shouldn't see an increase with uber on, going by the performance results posted so far (~25fps on GTX 580). That is, unless they're supersampling through the CPU, which would be a terrible idea.

MrOogieBoogie said:
Guys, this game is destroying my PC.

AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 5600+ @ 2.9 GHz
ATI HD Radeon 4670 1GB
4GB DDR2 667 RAM

The game auto-detects to low settings. I've fumbled with the resolution (max: 1680x1050), bringing as far down as 1280x800, but nothing seems to help. In fact, I think I was getting better frames when selecting medium settings over low.

So, based off my specs, what advanced graphics options should I stay completely clear from? I don't know what a lot of them mean, like texture downscaling, texture memory, etc. Right now I'm average 15 fps no matter what I do it seems.

Thoughts?

Sounds to me like the game just isn't scalable at all. Unless the poor performance is a result of bad drivers, there's not much hope other than getting better hardware. The question remains: where does the bottleneck lie? Hopefully I can run some tests tonight and give people an idea of how CPU and GPU affect performance.

One suggestion: open task manager (ctrl+shift+esc) and go to the performance tab. Run the game for a bit. See how stressed your dual-core CPU is. If it's running at 100%, then you've got a CPU bottleneck.
 
AppleSmack said:
I Got an MSI GTX 460 1GB Cyclone. I assume its easy to overclock using that tool? I never overclocked my hardware before. Kinda scares me.

They pretty much expect you to. All you have to do is key in the clock speeds you want and its done. The only way to screw up the card is to play with the voltage.

Better to ask for specifics in the PC thread though.
 

Easy_D

never left the stone age
Mashing said:
Interested in how this would run on Q6600 w/ 5870, 4GB RAM.

Hmm, Toasty's specs are pretty similar, which is encouraging.
It runs well enough on my C2D with a 5870 on medium(ish). Not exactly buttery smooth but at least the framerate is consistent, cutscenes run pretty smooth so far though.

One huge problem is the fact that my drivers crashed and my computer hardlocked, dunno if it's the game or AMD's fault. Anyone else on 11.5 experiencing this? Only happened once and I hope that's it.

Also, I have a lame ol' 4:3 monitor, can I turn widescreen off? Black borders are pretty ugly.

Edit: Scratch that, after you get out of that tower the framerate dips to 22. Ew. Gonna have to fiddle with the CPU intense settings I guess. Or pray I get a summer job.
 

Corky

Nine out of ten orphans can't tell the difference.
CPU: 2600@4.6
GPU: 560 ti sli oc 900mhz
Resolution: 1080p
Preset: ultra
Location (of test): intro cutscene
Framerate: between 40-50 on avg
Custom Settings: uber off

CPU: 2600@4.6
GPU: 560 ti sli oc 900mhz
Resolution: 1080p
Preset: ultra
Location (of test): intro cutscene
Framerate: between 15-25 on avg
Custom Settings: uber on

other than that it works well in game, pretty much 60 70% of the time and between 40-50 the remaining 30% throughout the first 3 hours
 

LiquidMetal14

hide your water-based mammals
@TheExodus

Sorry for not being so clear, I'm still basically in R&D mode messing with things. I was getting 60 and up on average with ULTRA settings and vsync off.

I decided to try uber and was getting 18-45 depending on where I was at in the following shots. Averaging in the upper 20's for the most part but dipping as low as 18 but no lower in any occurrence.

witcher22011-05-1710-5m7y8.png


witcher22011-05-1710-5z7uz.png


witcher22011-05-1710-5l74b.png


witcher22011-05-1710-5f74f.png


THese shots look almost the same as ultra without uber. Not worth the performance hit in my opinion.
 

Minsc

Gold Member
Easy_D said:
Also, I have a lame ol' 4:3 monitor, can I turn widescreen off? Black borders are pretty ugly.

Game only runs at 16:9 resolutions without borders. A future patch will allow 16:10 resolutions without the borders, but there are currently no plans for native 4:3 resolution support.
 

LiquidMetal14

hide your water-based mammals
These 2 shots are without uber. The second one is one I tried to take from the same location as one of the others from my other post. Just to compare.

witcher22011-05-1710-3q7ob.png


witcher22011-05-1710-347q0.png
 

Minsc

Gold Member
wwm0nkey said:
Nvidia beta drivers are a god send! Actually get decent FPS now

Just a general fyi, if you update your drivers and get new results, I will edit them in to the OP if you make a new post. If you update an older post, I won't ever notice them. :)
 

MrOogieBoogie

BioShock Infinite is like playing some homeless guy's vivid imagination
TheExodu5 said:
You're getting 60fps with uber on or off? I was saying that you shouldn't see an increase with uber on, going by the performance results posted so far (~25fps on GTX 580). That is, unless they're supersampling through the CPU, which would be a terrible idea.



Sounds to me like the game just isn't scalable at all. Unless the poor performance is a result of bad drivers, there's not much hope other than getting better hardware. The question remains: where does the bottleneck lie? Hopefully I can run some tests tonight and give people an idea of how CPU and GPU affect performance.

One suggestion: open task manager (ctrl+shift+esc) and go to the performance tab. Run the game for a bit. See how stressed your dual-core CPU is. If it's running at 100%, then you've got a CPU bottleneck.

Well, I have the game minimized, and my CPU Usage is around 1%-10%.
 
Any suggestion on what to disable without compromising visual fidelity?

I'm on a i5 750 and gtx480, I get strange framerates, from smooth to unplayable with everything set to ultra or recommended (which is ultra minus ubersampling and some other options).

I'm updating the drivers now.
 
toasty_T said:
They pretty much expect you to. All you have to do is key in the clock speeds you want and its done. The only way to screw up the card is to play with the voltage.

Better to ask for specifics in the PC thread though.

Alright thanks. I`m going to go for it.
 

TheExodu5

Banned
MrOogieBoogie said:
Well, I have the game minimized, and my CPU Usage is around 1%-10%.

Where's the graph at it's highest point? Sure, it'll go down to nothing when you minimize, but just keep the task manager up while you play the game, and it will graph CPU utilization while the game is running.
 

MrOogieBoogie

BioShock Infinite is like playing some homeless guy's vivid imagination
MrOogieBoogie said:
Guys, this game is destroying my PC.

AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 5600+ @ 2.9 GHz
ATI HD Radeon 4670 1GB
4GB DDR2 667 RAM

The game auto-detects to low settings. I've fumbled with the resolution (max: 1680x1050), bringing as far down as 1280x800, but nothing seems to help. In fact, I think I was getting better frames when selecting medium settings over low.

So, based off my specs, what advanced graphics options should I stay completely clear from? I don't know what a lot of them mean, like texture downscaling, texture memory, etc. Right now I'm average 15 fps no matter what I do it seems.

Thoughts?

Anyone else?
 

JohngPR

Member
Just an update, I turned off motion blur and SSAO and now I'm getting 25-35 fps wish an ocassional dip into the 40's in indoor areas.

MrOogieBoogie said:
Anyone else?

Open the advanced settings and try to auto detect again. It did the same to me, and when I did that, it changed it to high settings.
 
JohngPR said:
Just an update, I turned off motion blur and SSAO and now I'm getting 25-35 fps wish an ocassional dip into the 40's in indoor areas.



Open the advanced settings and try to auto detect again. It did the same to me, and when I did that, it changed it to high settings.

versus what? plus how much worse does it look without SSAO?
 

rogue74

Member
boundedseven said:
I'm installing the game and will post performance soon.

Can someone suggest if i should go with Nvidia 270.61 WHQL certified or Beta 275.27. I've got a GTX 460


I have a GTX 460 as well. Make sure to post what CPU you are using and what resolution you are playing at.
 
Top Bottom