Truant said:Anyone have an SLI profile I can use? I was getting 60fps in one area, but the rest of the game is 20-35, and I'm on a GTX295. Tips?
Lostconfused said:Great. My GTX 470 is barely managing to stay above 30. Time to run out and buy a 580 or something.
Also resolution seems to be having the bigest impact on my FPS. Changing between ultra/high/medium barely effects the frame rate. But if I drop it down from 1080 to 720 it jumps to 80fps.
boundedseven said:The latest beta drivers are supposed to download the profile automatically.
metareferential said:I get horrid framerates no matter what. Always about 25-30. There's something wrong.
Playing at 1680x1050, as said i5 750, gtx480, 4gb ram.
I just tried disabling all DoF, SSAO, ubersampling, and motion blur. Still 25-30. No v-sync.
If that's how it runs, I'll just stick with ultra.
cleveridea said:versus what? plus how much worse does it look without SSAO?
metareferential said:I get horrid framerates no matter what. Always about 25-30. There's something wrong.
Playing at 1680x1050, as said i5 750, gtx480, 4gb ram.
I just tried disabling all DoF, SSAO, ubersampling, and motion blur. Still 25-30. No v-sync.
If that's how it runs, I'll just stick with ultra.
cleveridea said:versus what? plus how much worse does it look without SSAO?
metareferential said:I get horrid framerates no matter what. Always about 25-30. There's something wrong.
Playing at 1680x1050, as said i5 750, gtx480, 4gb ram.
I just tried disabling all DoF, SSAO, ubersampling, and motion blur. Still 25-30. No v-sync.
If that's how it runs, I'll just stick with ultra.
No. I have a first generation i5 as well. I can get 60 fps or above by turning all the graphical settings as low as they will go.TheExodu5 said:Does changing the resolution affect your framerate? If not, it might indicate a CPU bottleneck. And if so, that is a scary prospect, considering that you're running a fairly fast quad core.
Gully State said:What does texture memory budget and downscale texture factor do?
It's true! I'm able to run uber with my 9800GTM at 800x600 perfectly.Lostconfused said:Great. My GTX 470 is barely managing to stay above 30. Time to run out and buy a 580 or something.
Also resolution seems to be having the bigest impact on my FPS. Changing between ultra/high/medium barely effects the frame rate. But if I drop it down from 1080 to 720 it jumps to 80fps.
ColeTheMole said:start of act1 no spoilers
http://i.imgur.com/cvSgD.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/MmGdA.jpg
still testing, thats why the resolution but no way im going to manage ubersampling haha
My 4650 needs replacing now I guessBrannon said:Damn it, my Radeon 4850 HD just isn't going to be enough. I shall have to be patient for now.
Metalmurphy said:Black borders...
Another game that only supports 16:9?
I use Fraps.longdi said:how to see the fps?
Salaadin said:I dont know what texture memory budget does but I set it to max.
Downscale texture factor made my textures look like ass.
MrOogieBoogie said:Guys, this game is destroying my PC.
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 5600+ @ 2.9 GHz
ATI HD Radeon 4670 1GB
4GB DDR2 667 RAM
The game auto-detects to low settings. I've fumbled with the resolution (max: 1680x1050), bringing as far down as 1280x800, but nothing seems to help. In fact, I think I was getting better frames when selecting medium settings over low.
So, based off my specs, what advanced graphics options should I stay completely clear from? I don't know what a lot of them mean, like texture downscaling, texture memory, etc. Right now I'm average 15 fps no matter what I do it seems.
Thoughts?
Gully State said:Hopefully memory budget reduces pop in when set to max..
Pankaks said:May want to add this to the OP:
http://www.gog.com/en/forum/the_witcher_2/common_issues_and_possible_solutions_read_before_posting
Technosteve said:Anyone with a ATI 4890 have frame rates? Will i get sub 30 fps at 1080p? I don't really care if i don't get 60 fps since this isn't a shooter.
snoopeasystreet said:How big is the download for this bad boy?
Oh nice, D2D splits them up too?Minsc said:Steam is ~16GB (bonus content bundled in)
GOG/D2D is ~9.5GB with bonus content available as separate downloads.
cleveridea said:someone should force developers to use and test on dual core CPU, GTX 260's
This game is coming out for console at some point FFS, no reason to be such a bad performance on people's hardware.
having said that, I am hoping this is GOTY. I am installing to SSD, the only game to have that honor. Dont let me down W2!
3chopl0x said:Yeah, at sub HD resolutions and running on graphics close to medium/low
fizzelopeguss said:CPU limited, i'm having the same issue. Dual cores just don't cut it anymore.
MrOogieBoogie said:Wow, really? Damn. So is there basically nothing I can to improve my performance besides buying a new CPU?
Truant said:Definitive SLI issues here on my GTX295 using the latest beta drivers.
Setup 1:
Max settings @ 1080p - No Ubersampling
SLI: nVidia recommended multi-GPU
FPS: 25-35
GPU 1 Load: 56%
GPU 2 Load: 56%
Setup 2:
Max settings @ 1080p - No Ubersampling
SLI: Single GPU mode
FPS: 25-35
GPU 1 Load: 99%
GPU 2 Load: 0%
Seems that the SLI modes wont let the GPUs work efficiently. With the right SLI profile, Crysis 2 uses both GPUs at 90% +
I've tried both the Force Alternate Frame Rendering settings, 1 and 2. No difference.
I'm using the nVidia control panel to change the settings, MSI Afterburner to monitor GPU load, and FRAPS to monitor FPS.