Dragon1893
Member
how accurate the game to the book?
It completely respects the source material. CDPR did a great job imo.
how accurate the game to the book?
how accurate the game to the book?
Basically picks up where the novels leave off, so if you've read the novels, you'll be inundated in references to the novels. First title especially. Still if you don't read a thing before jumping in, the game does a fine job on its own.
I'd argue the whole Alvin subplot is a reasonably large deviation from the books but other then that I agree.
Nice thread!
Is there a good recap but only for the first game?I played it many years ago and i dont remember much.
OP, I just want you to know that we appreciate your not mentioning certain abomination attached to the franchise. You protected the helpless, good on you.
(I actually really like the theme song though)
Sapkowski considers it by and large it's own independent work inspired by his rather than a direct sequel or alternate reality.
"The game - with all due respect to it, but let's finally say it openly - is not an 'alternative version', nor a sequel. The game is a free adaptation containing elements of my work; an adaptation created by different authors," he noted.
So yeah I agree with the Alvin subplot note, I still feel like it's appropriate enough though. Either way it isn't really necessary to read through to enjoy the series, but I find it much more enjoyable knowing character backstories as they're introduced ingame. I am glad that the games have gathered enough interest to have the books translated for a wider audience.
i kinda fear there will be small difference now with Witcher 3 , because the whole history surrounding Yen, Ciri, Emhyr, "Red horsemen"If there were contradictions or overlaps in the stories it would be a different matter, but as it is you can think of the games as the continuation of Geralt's adventures, since they coexist perfectly.
It helps that the games have a ton of references to the books and build upon those events, whicgh makes the whole thing more cohesive.
i kinda fear there will be small difference now with Witcher 3 , because the whole history with Ciri, Emhyr, "Red horsemen"and Geralt is far too complex to explain it fast to games-only people , but honestly hope that CDP can do it without creating inconsistencies(Wild Hunt)
I don't think that it's that complex. It's not the background I worry about, it's their story itself. How are they going to resolve it? What is the execution going to be like? I'm afraid it's going to be cheesy, "save-the-world" scenario, with no depth at all. It's not that previous games had bad plot, it's just that the studio had made questionable decisions in the past, also regarding the story. I'm hoping for the best, but... The Witcher 3: please be good.
Also, they are introducing some iconic characters in the saga, and I have my personal fears about that. One that is going to be a second playable character (and the most key player in the plot), while also being co-protagonist in the books, along with Geralt. The second one is a love interest, a rival to popular Triss. To make them work, there's going to be needed a lot of effort on writers, animators and voice actors part. I selfishly want them both to be perfectly in line with the novels, and that's no easy task, especially considering time constraints. And its possible to ruin them completely - look what they already did to poor, poor Dandelion... he was everybody's favorite before, now? Hardly anyone cares about him and if they do, they hate him. I don't want Ciri or Yen to meet similar fate.
how accurate the game to the book?
Suggestion from me : the videos from ShoddyCast are pretty good - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrrzVp2HIMk
The games don't adapt the books, literally speaking. It's just in the same universe with the same main character.
I think it was very intelligent to do it that way. It's done by other authors, who tell their own story so there isn't any discussion of "this part isn't accurate!", but while doing it they re-use not only the setting and characters, but they re-imagine some plots and themes from the books while doing their new story.
So in the books the theme of racism, humans vs non-human, guerilla warfare and terrorism is touched, same as in the games.
In the books there is a romance with a sorceress, Yennefer. in the games they use another soceress from the book, Triss, as romance plot.
In the books the war of the Nilfgaard empire and other political fights and the plots of the mages are key plots in the middle/late books. Again in Witcher 2 both themes are present.
In the book there is a theme of parenthood, as Geralt has to take care of a little girl called Ciri (which secretly has mystical powers), and of course in the end he cares for her. In Witcher 1 Geralt has to take care of Alvin, a little child, who also has mystical powers. See the parallel?
That said, now in Witcher 3 it seems maybe because they trust themselves more and because they have a legion of fans, but they are going to tackle directly the stuff from the witcher books, like the characters of Yennefer and Ciri.
how accurate the game to the book?
Great OP. Thank you for your hard work Dragon1893 and SpacePirate Ridley.
The games have greatly exxagarated the power of Geralt's signs (aka magic) and the extent to which Geralt relies on them. I swear, in the books, he used Axii once to calm down his horse and Agnii to burn down some ropes tying him. A far cry from the mind control and flame thrower of the games.
The story of W1 and W2 is also to quite a large extent, a retread of some plot points from the books. (Full Saga Book SpoilersAlvin is basically Ciri bis and W2 story is a rehash of Times of Contempt.
Also, Hussite Trilogy > Witcher saga.
The games have greatly exxagarated the power of Geralt's signs (aka magic) and the extent to which Geralt relies on them. I swear, in the books, he used Axii once to calm down his horse and Agnii to burn down some ropes tying him. A far cry from the mind control and flame thrower of the games.
The story of W1 and W2 is also to quite a large extent, a retread of some plot points from the books. (Full Saga Book SpoilersAlvin is basically Ciri bis and W2 story is a rehash of Times of Contempt.
Also, Hussite Trilogy > Witcher saga.
Great I was looking a thread like that.
I read all the book in the last two weeks and I'm replaying TW1 (At chapter 5) and will play through TW2 that I did not finish first time around. I'll be up to date before TW3.
I'm really interested to see Yennefer and Ciri in the game. And now that I know all the story/character, it's a little harder to go through TW1 and TW2 knowing that Yennefer and Ciri are not in there. Also, seeing the relation with Triss when you know that she remember everything but say nothing to Geralt is making me cringe a little. But maybe I put too much tought into that.
Anyway, great thread, will keep an eye ont it!
I respectfully disagree. I loved Narrenturm when it first came out and enjoyed the second book. By the time Lux Perpetua was published, I unfortunately forgot everything from the series, tried to re-read it... and couldn't even finish the first part. This is why, even though I own the whole trilogy, I never even started the final one. For context, I read The Witcher saga gazillion times.
Maybe it's not the book, it's me.
Great job on the OT!
Although that picture of the King of the Wild Hunt is outdated. He looks like this now:
Great job on the OT!
Although that picture of the King of the Wild Hunt is outdated. He looks like this now:
Oh man this dude is menacing as hell. And The Wild Hunt are elves too, right?
Great job on the OT!
Although that picture of the King of the Wild Hunt is outdated. He looks like this now:
Damn, you are right!
Blast you Witcher wikia for not being updated!
Will change it when i have some time tomorrow.
Finally got around to the Witcher 2. Why is everything so slow and clunky? Moving around, navigating menus, switching items all feel like crap. Even dice poker is so much worse than the first game. Did they shoehorn controller support after the fact?
Now I remember being 2, but as you say, its pretty difficult to fin the one you posted.Yeah, the wikia wont be updated anymore. The guys that were running it says the wikia people were being to restrictive so they moved everything over to http://witcher.gamepedia.com/Witcher_Wiki, which is endorsed by CDPR as the official wiki for the Witcher games. Too bad google still only links to the old site.
You're right, I was looking at the UK release date which was January 7 of this year.
When I was looking for art for the banners, I only found that resolution or that image.Thanks SpacePirate, will update right away.
Time to share some cool Witcher wallpapers you guys might have.
Does anyone have a higher quality version of this?
Well, to be fair signs wouldn't be any fun to use in a game if they were that weak. I think CDPR definitely made the right call there.
Thanks for the kind words.
It's actually kind of funny to think about, but on the other hand - pretty understandable from the gameplay perspective. Even now people complain that there's little variety in the fight styles of the game.
That is true - although I don't mind the plot of TW2 that much, it could be seen as a logical extension of the political problems from the saga. Of course, we'd have to assume that EmhyrIt's stretching credibility a bit, but I'm willing to let it slide, especially since it's obvious that RED wanted to include that character really badly.would want to invade Northern Kingdoms again, even after Brenna.
Wild Hunt - oooh, this is the one I can buy completely -. I'm actually happy that they're continuing the story.afterall, nothing on that front really resolved itself in the books
I respectfully disagree. I loved Narrenturm when it first came out and enjoyed the second book. By the time Lux Perpetua was published, I unfortunately forgot everything from the series, tried to re-read it... and couldn't even finish the first part. This is why, even though I own the whole trilogy, I never even started the final one. For context, I read The Witcher saga gazillion times.
Maybe it's not the book, it's me.
Here's another recent interpretation of that sceneI love this picture of Ciri and the iconic scene from books
Was it announced that Sword of Destiny is receiving an English translation? I've looked online but I can't find anything. It would be odd for them to publish a set of short stories released before the novels before publishing the next major installment of the series. It would make the wait for The Swallow's Tower more bearable.
I love this picture of Ciri and the iconic scene from books
(http://wojciechfus.deviantart.com/art/Ciri-482996212)
Ciri seems like a pretty cool character
Can't wait to learn more of her. Is she present in The Last Wish or does she join later on?
Her story starts in The Last Wish but you don't know it until Sword of Destiny.Ciri seems like a pretty cool character
Can't wait to learn more of her. Is she present in The Last Wish or does she join later on?
She's divisive. Some people (like me) love her, some hate her with passion. She's co-protagonist of the books along with Geralt though, so you've gotta bear with her
She's technically "present" (lol) in The Last Wish, but you meet her properly in Sword of Destiny.