There is no Epstein Client List


Remember, also, that Trump heavily considered pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell. During her incarceration, he said something bizarre like "I wish her well". Wtf, why would you wish someone like her well? It is clear Donny is deathly afraid of the lolita-peddling madam.

Nah, nothing will take down the elite.
It's all academic, anyway, like I said.
 
Last edited:

Remember, also, that Trump heavily considered pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell. During her incarceration, he said something bizarre like "I wish her well". Wtf, why would you wish someone like her well? It is clear Donny is deathly afraid of the lolita-peddling madam.


It's all academic, anyway, like I said.

 
I don't care who wrote the files. If that's such a problem, then just say it and release the files anyway. But that isn't even a fraction of what should be happening. They already said there's boxes of tapes with kids getting abused, but now there's no abusers and no arrests? They can't backtrack this
Those tapes, according to Bondi, were of Epstein. He was arrested and awaiting trial. Maxwell was arrested and convicted.

What's so hard to understand about this?


Of course this segment of the dems will play into this crap. The psychosis around this topic is too politically gainful. One can only wonder though why 2 massively opposed administrations have come to the same conclusion. And before anyone says it: The idea that "half of Washington" or something like that is on the "list" is openly ridiculous on its face.
 
I like Trump, voted for him… this is the first thing he's done with his admin that legitimately pissed me off. It's full retard and in the face of everything said.
 
Those tapes, according to Bondi, were of Epstein. He was arrested and awaiting trial. Maxwell was arrested and convicted.

What's so hard to understand about this?


Of course this segment of the dems will play into this crap. The psychosis around this topic is too politically gainful.

I mean, this admin had every opportunity to make this a slam dunk win for them.

They've simply instead decided to torpedo any semblance of credibility they could have salvaged at every opportunity.

Whatever happens going forward is entirely on them. They highlighted this specific subject in the lead up to the election and were vocal about it plenty even after they won. To fumble thjs badly at this stage cannot be blamed on Dems or anyone else. They set themselves up for failure.
 
One can only wonder though why 2 massively opposed administrations have come to the same conclusion.
Because maybe they aren't as massively opposed as you think they are.

If the files contain blackmail, both administrations stand to benefit by using that as leverage to control both allies and enemies.
If the files contain material that incriminates members of the elite billionaire class, both administrations stand to benefit by keeping them safe and donating to their campaigns.
If the files contain material that incriminates members of both parties, both administrations would rather keep quiet than risk harming themselves in the collateral damage that would follow.

While they may seem massively opposed on the social and cultural wedge issues that they play to keep the masses distracted, they are both very much invested in the "it's a big club and you ain't in it" philosophy.

 
ain't no fucking way...




dude...
Sorry Not Sorry Idk GIF by HyperX

Dude, the footage doesn't even show the entrance to Epstein's cell. It's totally irrelevant
 
It's kind of weird that Trump was going on about this list for the longest time and now he just wants everyone to stop thinking about it, usually he's fairly sensible with the kinds of messages he crafts for his audience.
Seems there was some major miscalculation and people either feel momentarily confused or maybe for some the veil has been finally lifted from their eyes? I have no idea, it always sucks when one finds out their view of things has been skewed or manipulated.
I remember when I was super deep in the_donald subreddit thinking I knew something no one else did, being part of some special community that knew the "truth". Looking back it seems like some very smart people knew exactly what to do to manipulate me. Perhaps this will be the end of manipulation for a lot of people.
 
Like I told yall in a thread a while ago, it's incredibly likely a super majority of politicians, celebrities, high ranking executives, and wealthy elites the world over frequented this man's lolita brothels. Dumping a list and mass prosecutions would literally collapse entire industries, governments, and economies overnight. It would be like a nuclear war.
 
Dude, the previous admin sat on this for FOUR DAMNED YEARS!!! Do you really think that if there was any kind of even remotely conclusive proof that Trump was banging underaged girls that it wouldn't have been released?

This is what happens when the MSM sells their souls and the DNC descends into the most pathetic misinformation attempts. All the silly shit they threw at Trump for years and THIS, the damned SILVER BULLET, they hold back? Bullshit.

Unless the ONLY evidence they have on Trump is somehow permanently welded to evidence on a Clinton or someone like that (i.e. they are both in the same video) then it makes no sense that it wouldn't have been used.

Who knows what actual evidence they have. Likely flight manifests and witness statements. But nothing that would hold up in court because it isn't illegal to be on a plane with a 17 year old girl and if she won't come forward to say what happened, well, that's the end of it. And Epstein had enough legitimate visitors and events there that it wasn't as if he was running nothing but a brothel service.

???

The 'previous admin' didn't have people in higher up positions going on the same MSM saying they have the 'epstein client list' on their desk and are reviewing it and will release it.

Nor did they make public shows like inviting influencers to the white house and handing them dossiers of 'epstein files'

4474e813bf991442edab89e455e5e6cac931c9b3.jpeg



The vast majority of people do not give a shit if the file has DNC or RNC names on it, we just want the thing that was promised to us, if you're going to make such a big show about it and make it a prominent part of your campaign, then this kind of blow back should be the least bit surprising.
 
Last edited:
Fucking hell man, stop with the cope. You're making excuses for a child sex trafficing cover up by the guy who pushed it, made promises on it and has continually used it as a political weapon.

Trump's doing the most blatant and shameless coverup and gaslighting we've EVER seen on this. His own bullshit responses are wholly contradictory, easily disproven and and are the clearest demonstration of his own implication in it all that you'll ever get short of him just outright coming out and saying he fucked kids and was part of this whole thing with his best mate calling it a BEAUTIFUL patriotic example of WINNING in big capital letters.

We've already established why the other side wouldn't use it - they have people implicated too. Donors, friends, party members and probably former presidents. None of that excuses Trump's involvement and efforts to bury it. Just stop making excuses for it - stop enabling this horrific cover-up and abuse of minors by the elite because it implicates Trump.

You haven't established jack or shit. No one here has seen whatever constitutes the "Epstein List". I'm not defending Trump, just stating that if there was IRON CLAD evidence, particularly video evidence, it would have come out in the past FOUR YEARS when the current admin and the ENTIRE media went after Trump. A video of Trump plowing a child doesn't implicate Clinton, Hanks, Gates, Spielberg, or any one else. It ONLY implicates Trump 'cause he is the ONLY ONE in the video. So why haven't we seen it?

Simplest answer is that there is not such a video. Not of Trump, maybe of others though.

But most likely is any "Epstein's List" is circumstantial regarding specific acts of child sexual assault and it wouldn't hold up against Trump, nor anyone else. There is smoke, but no fire, from a LEGAL perspective, and sadly that is the ONLY perspective that matters. The US gov isn't in the business of slander or libel, which is EXACTLY what releasing a bunch of testimony to the general public would be.

Y'all gotta stop watching NCIS or SVU, the real world just doesn't work that way. Epstein choking to death, whether by his own hand or someone else, is probably the only justice those poor girls are gonna get.
 
There's a good chance that Epstein and Diddy have the same list.
Ugh...
Just say you have no idea about the facts of either case.

The fact of the matter is that when he was first convicted in 2007, the AG of Florida got a call from some Intelligence people to let him off lightly.
That is not a fact.
The consensus around the notion that Alex Acosta was told to back off Epstein because he was "for intelligence" stems solely from a Daily Beast article which sources the quote from an anonymous former Trump 1 admin official who claimed to have heard from the transition team that Acosta said as much.

When personally and directly asked by DOJ investigators, he said the following:

The OPR report also looked into allegations that have surfaced in press reports over the years that Epstein may have gotten special treatment because he was some sort of "asset" to U.S. intelligence agencies.

"Acosta stated to OPR that 'the answer is no,'" the report said.

Because maybe they aren't as massively opposed as you think they are.
Of course. The conspiracy is all-encompassing. Do you realize how ridiculous this is? Do you forget that the Biden DOJ launched a legal onslaught to neutralize the Trump campaign? That cable media engaged in a 24/7 hysterical crusade against Trump on all of his legal problems and political goals? That they're still doing it now??

If the files contain blackmail, both administrations stand to benefit by using that as leverage to control both allies and enemies.
If the files contain material that incriminates members of the elite billionaire class, both administrations stand to benefit by keeping them safe and donating to their campaigns.
If the files contain material that incriminates members of both parties, both administrations would rather keep quiet than risk harming themselves in the collateral damage that would follow.
If "they" have the capability to build such an all-encompassing and vast blackmail network in the first place, and are then able to sustain and grow it over multiple decades without flagging journalistic or prosecutorial apparatus disparate across time and space, "they" would also have the ability to selectively expose individuals who fell too far out of line. There's no inbetween. There wouldn't even be a point in creating such a network for leverage if the entire thing was to break down from a singular exposure.

While they may seem massively opposed on the social and cultural wedge issues that they play to keep the masses distracted, they are both very much invested in the "it's a big club and you ain't in it" philosophy.


They don't "seem" opposed, they are ridiculously opposed. It might not be personal between some of them as individuals, but there are absolutely serious ideological divides between many different political factions in Washington.

Carlin and the people that echo this point of his are ironically just as dedicated to a simplistic us vs. them worldview as they claim the "elites" are. Existential levels of cope.


It's kind of weird that Trump was going on about this list for the longest time and now he just wants everyone to stop thinking about it, usually he's fairly sensible with the kinds of messages he crafts for his audience.
Trump was never on a crusade about "the list" or the files. Pretty sure he never even brought up Epstein himself without first being asked. It's a segment of his admin, campaign staff and base that have spent years circulating theories about it.
 
Last edited:
This unsettling assassination scene in Michael Clayton comes to mind after so many of these recent deaths of whistleblowers. Boeing, OpenAI, Epstein's accuser, etc.

They make it look so easy:

 
She's apparently willing to testify before Congress re: the list.

She won't live long enough for that to happen.
This thing involves people so powerful and so immoral, that child rape and murder are inconsequential.
And the worst part is that a lot of the people on that list are on Congress and other political positions.
 
Like I told yall in a thread a while ago, it's incredibly likely a super majority of politicians, celebrities, high ranking executives, and wealthy elites the world over frequented this man's lolita brothels. Dumping a list and mass prosecutions would literally collapse entire industries, governments, and economies overnight. It would be like a nuclear war.
Good.
 
Glasnost moment?

Like the pak rape gangs over here this kind of thing obliterates all trust in the system.

We all knew it was bullshit and rotten... But to see it so flagrant is something else entirely.
 
I start to wonder, if you make 1B$ you have to become a p3do.

It seems a big % of that group really like fondling with kids.

Its a sad sad world when they really want to protect sexual predators, the lowest of the low. This is such a sh*tshow
To me, this implies a darker truth that pedophilia is a crime of opportunity, not a predilection of the elites especially (in so far as occurrence vs general population); i.e., a lot of poor closet pedophiles around.
 
To me, this implies a darker truth that pedophilia is a crime of opportunity, not a predilection of the elites especially (in so far as occurrence vs general population); i.e., a lot of poor closet pedophiles around.

They do it because they know they can get away with anything, it's about POWER. I doubt that half of them were born as pedophiles.

Forbidden fruit etc.

Same thing but for grown up women in Arab countries:

The term "Porta-Potty" refers to secretive parties where young women are allegedly paid large sums to participate in degrading sex acts—often involving human waste and physical abuse. According to a chilling exposé by The Mirror, these events—allegedly hosted by ultra-wealthy individuals—entice young models and influencers with the promise of designer gifts, five-star hotel stays, and cash rewards, only to subject them to humiliating and abusive experiences.


It's pretty different…

Numbers are for sure much lower but 100% there are people killed like that by agencies. Every country has a dark side.
 
Last edited:
With big money comes corruption and with corruption comes all sorts of sexual depravations. It's a cause-effect thing and that's why people of this profile should be watched more closely than the average Joe.

So, for those who feel the urge to protect their favorite celebrity or politician, think that they would fuck your little daughter in front of you if given the chance, so don't hesitate to wish them burn.
 
Last edited:
They do it because they know they can get away with anything, it's about POWER. I doubt that half of them were born as pedophiles.

Forbidden fruit etc.

Same thing but not for grown up women in Arab countries:



You and I are pretty much in agreement, it's just semantics. I suspect you are right in that many in the "pedophile elites" are not into children primarily as a fetish, or maybe at all; but they've tried everything else, orgies with thicc latinas, eating sushi off of five geishas at a bathhouse, but whatever they do, it eventually grows old (no pun intended); so they're forced to escalate the perversions to the next level in order to feel that dopamine rush again.

But I am saying that it's possible that the predilection to escalate in this manner is divided evenly amongst the population, the elites are no more or less "evil" by base nature. But they have the power, and they have the opportunity. This is the human condition.
 
Last edited:
You and I are pretty much in agreement, it's just semantics. I suspect you are right in that many in the "pedophile elites" are not into children primarily as a fetish, or maybe at all; but they've tried everything else, orgies with thicc latinas, eating sushi off of five geishas at a bathhouse, but whatever they do, it eventually grows old (no pun intended); so they're forced to escalate the perversions to the next level in order to feel that dopamine rush again.

But I am saying that it's possible that the predilection to escalate in this manner is divided evenly amongst the population, the elites are no more or less "evil" by base nature. But they have the power, and they have the opportunity. This is the human condition.

100% agree.
 
You and I are pretty much in agreement, it's just semantics. I suspect you are right in that many in the "pedophile elites" are not into children primarily as a fetish, or maybe at all; but they've tried everything else, orgies with thicc latinas, eating sushi off of five geishas at a bathhouse, but whatever they do, it eventually grows old (no pun intended); so they're forced to escalate the perversions to the next level in order to feel that dopamine rush again.

But I am saying that it's possible that the predilection to escalate in this manner is divided evenly amongst the population, the elites are no more or less "evil" by base nature. But they have the power, and they have the opportunity. This is the human condition.
You see it with celebs all the time. Think Hugh Grant or Eddie Murphy got caught with trans hookers as their FIRST time stepping out? Hell no, those guys plowed through every pussy variation IMAGINABLE and finally hit "chick with a dick" on their bingo card.

Sleeping with underage girls , particularly late adolescent ones, is probably more about flaunting the law and "reclaiming youth/taking innocence" since there isn't much physically different between a 16-17 year old and 18-19 (especially in todays hormone soaked era of caloric excess), except of course that gulf of legality. So why take the risk? It's all about the thrill and the power, and presumably, for Epstein, now having the blackmail material.

Just wait till AI generated material really hits. The amount of debauched degenerated heinous crap, freed from the need to have any humans present and consenting, is gonna explode!

On the plus side would it make the risk of actually making (or possessing) 'real' child porn or a snuff film too high and end up saving actual living humans? Or will it drive these dark fetishes even further and create an expanding market of "the real mccoy" that can hide behind AI created chaff? I think there will always be a demand for real, versus simulated, experiences and that cachet of an actual participatory event will only grow as our lives become increasingly artificial, manufactured, and, quite frankly, too comfortable to deliver any meaningful satisfaction.
 
If you're going to hype up one of these things, you can't simply pretend there was nothing there. It makes you look like either a complete liar or just a coward.

Maybe the files aren't nearly as bad as they thought or, alternatively, they're far worse than what anyone would have imagined. But you cannot hide this elephant forever.

Nothing they've said so far has amounted to a full and comprehensive explanation either way.

Personally, I'm not surprised because I couldn't possibly have a lower opinion of this guy though.
 
Last edited:
On the plus side would it make the risk of actually making (or possessing) 'real' child porn or a snuff film too high and end up saving actual living humans? Or will it drive these dark fetishes even further and create an expanding market of "the real mccoy" that can hide behind AI created chaff? I think there will always be a demand for real, versus simulated, experiences and that cachet of an actual participatory event will only grow as our lives become increasingly artificial, manufactured, and, quite frankly, too comfortable to deliver any meaningful satisfaction.
That's assuming the fake AI cp won't be outlawed, which it almost certainly will.
 
Top Bottom