darrylgorn
Member
You don't care about the dismantling and burning at stake of the clients of Elite Sex Crimes, inc.? That's certainly a weird take.
Sounds like just another Sunday.
You don't care about the dismantling and burning at stake of the clients of Elite Sex Crimes, inc.? That's certainly a weird take.
This would be a bigger takedown of "The Man" / mega elites than anything we have ever seen. Which is why it's never getting releasedSounds like just another Sunday.
Nah, nothing will take down the elite.This would be a bigger takedown of "The Man" / mega elites than anything we have ever seen. Which is why it's never getting released
It's all academic, anyway, like I said.Nah, nothing will take down the elite.
![]()
Trump Held Talks on Pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell: Biographer
President Donald Trump weighed pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell for fear that she would spill secrets about his decade-long friendship with convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. After Maxwell, now 63, was arrested by the FBI in July 2020 for allegedly helping Epstein run his sex-trafficking...www.yahoo.com
Remember, also, that Trump heavily considered pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell. During her incarceration, he said something bizarre like "I wish her well". Wtf, why would you wish someone like her well? It is clear Donny is deathly afraid of the lolita-peddling madam.
It's all academic, anyway, like I said.
Those tapes, according to Bondi, were of Epstein. He was arrested and awaiting trial. Maxwell was arrested and convicted.I don't care who wrote the files. If that's such a problem, then just say it and release the files anyway. But that isn't even a fraction of what should be happening. They already said there's boxes of tapes with kids getting abused, but now there's no abusers and no arrests? They can't backtrack this
If only there were evidence of him being a pathological liar before he chose not to release the Epstein filesReminder that this coward ran on the platform of releasing the list in full if he got elected
Those tapes, according to Bondi, were of Epstein. He was arrested and awaiting trial. Maxwell was arrested and convicted.
What's so hard to understand about this?
Of course this segment of the dems will play into this crap. The psychosis around this topic is too politically gainful.
Because maybe they aren't as massively opposed as you think they are.One can only wonder though why 2 massively opposed administrations have come to the same conclusion.
ain't no fucking way...
dude...
![]()
Dude, the previous admin sat on this for FOUR DAMNED YEARS!!! Do you really think that if there was any kind of even remotely conclusive proof that Trump was banging underaged girls that it wouldn't have been released?
This is what happens when the MSM sells their souls and the DNC descends into the most pathetic misinformation attempts. All the silly shit they threw at Trump for years and THIS, the damned SILVER BULLET, they hold back? Bullshit.
Unless the ONLY evidence they have on Trump is somehow permanently welded to evidence on a Clinton or someone like that (i.e. they are both in the same video) then it makes no sense that it wouldn't have been used.
Who knows what actual evidence they have. Likely flight manifests and witness statements. But nothing that would hold up in court because it isn't illegal to be on a plane with a 17 year old girl and if she won't come forward to say what happened, well, that's the end of it. And Epstein had enough legitimate visitors and events there that it wasn't as if he was running nothing but a brothel service.
Fucking hell man, stop with the cope. You're making excuses for a child sex trafficing cover up by the guy who pushed it, made promises on it and has continually used it as a political weapon.
Trump's doing the most blatant and shameless coverup and gaslighting we've EVER seen on this. His own bullshit responses are wholly contradictory, easily disproven and and are the clearest demonstration of his own implication in it all that you'll ever get short of him just outright coming out and saying he fucked kids and was part of this whole thing with his best mate calling it a BEAUTIFUL patriotic example of WINNING in big capital letters.
We've already established why the other side wouldn't use it - they have people implicated too. Donors, friends, party members and probably former presidents. None of that excuses Trump's involvement and efforts to bury it. Just stop making excuses for it - stop enabling this horrific cover-up and abuse of minors by the elite because it implicates Trump.
Ugh...There's a good chance that Epstein and Diddy have the same list.
That is not a fact.The fact of the matter is that when he was first convicted in 2007, the AG of Florida got a call from some Intelligence people to let him off lightly.
The OPR report also looked into allegations that have surfaced in press reports over the years that Epstein may have gotten special treatment because he was some sort of "asset" to U.S. intelligence agencies.
"Acosta stated to OPR that 'the answer is no,'" the report said.
Of course. The conspiracy is all-encompassing. Do you realize how ridiculous this is? Do you forget that the Biden DOJ launched a legal onslaught to neutralize the Trump campaign? That cable media engaged in a 24/7 hysterical crusade against Trump on all of his legal problems and political goals? That they're still doing it now??Because maybe they aren't as massively opposed as you think they are.
If "they" have the capability to build such an all-encompassing and vast blackmail network in the first place, and are then able to sustain and grow it over multiple decades without flagging journalistic or prosecutorial apparatus disparate across time and space, "they" would also have the ability to selectively expose individuals who fell too far out of line. There's no inbetween. There wouldn't even be a point in creating such a network for leverage if the entire thing was to break down from a singular exposure.If the files contain blackmail, both administrations stand to benefit by using that as leverage to control both allies and enemies.
If the files contain material that incriminates members of the elite billionaire class, both administrations stand to benefit by keeping them safe and donating to their campaigns.
If the files contain material that incriminates members of both parties, both administrations would rather keep quiet than risk harming themselves in the collateral damage that would follow.
While they may seem massively opposed on the social and cultural wedge issues that they play to keep the masses distracted, they are both very much invested in the "it's a big club and you ain't in it" philosophy.
Trump was never on a crusade about "the list" or the files. Pretty sure he never even brought up Epstein himself without first being asked. It's a segment of his admin, campaign staff and base that have spent years circulating theories about it.It's kind of weird that Trump was going on about this list for the longest time and now he just wants everyone to stop thinking about it, usually he's fairly sensible with the kinds of messages he crafts for his audience.
BREAKING: Ghislaine Maxwell found dead in her cell.
With the headline of "Post-menopausal women bleeds to death from massive period ickiness" no doubtBREAKING: Ghislaine Maxwell found dead in her cell.
Facts are they traffic people and fuck kids.Ugh...
Just say you have no idea about the facts of either case.
She's apparently willing to testify before Congress re: the list.
Good.Like I told yall in a thread a while ago, it's incredibly likely a super majority of politicians, celebrities, high ranking executives, and wealthy elites the world over frequented this man's lolita brothels. Dumping a list and mass prosecutions would literally collapse entire industries, governments, and economies overnight. It would be like a nuclear war.
This unsettling assassination scene in Michael Clayton comes to mind after so many of these recent deaths of whistleblowers. Boeing, OpenAI, Epstein's accuser, etc.
They make it look so easy:
Good.
Jesus, that is fucking terrifying.
To me, this implies a darker truth that pedophilia is a crime of opportunity, not a predilection of the elites especially (in so far as occurrence vs general population); i.e., a lot of poor closet pedophiles around.I start to wonder, if you make 1B$ you have to become a p3do.
It seems a big % of that group really like fondling with kids.
Its a sad sad world when they really want to protect sexual predators, the lowest of the low. This is such a sh*tshow
It's pretty different…USA is really not that much different.
To me, this implies a darker truth that pedophilia is a crime of opportunity, not a predilection of the elites especially (in so far as occurrence vs general population); i.e., a lot of poor closet pedophiles around.
The term "Porta-Potty" refers to secretive parties where young women are allegedly paid large sums to participate in degrading sex acts—often involving human waste and physical abuse. According to a chilling exposé by The Mirror, these events—allegedly hosted by ultra-wealthy individuals—entice young models and influencers with the promise of designer gifts, five-star hotel stays, and cash rewards, only to subject them to humiliating and abusive experiences.
It's pretty different…
You and I are pretty much in agreement, it's just semantics. I suspect you are right in that many in the "pedophile elites" are not into children primarily as a fetish, or maybe at all; but they've tried everything else, orgies with thicc latinas, eating sushi off of five geishas at a bathhouse, but whatever they do, it eventually grows old (no pun intended); so they're forced to escalate the perversions to the next level in order to feel that dopamine rush again.They do it because they know they can get away with anything, it's about POWER. I doubt that half of them were born as pedophiles.
Forbidden fruit etc.
Same thing but not for grown up women in Arab countries:
![]()
Revealed: What happens behind the glamour and glitz in Dubai's porta-potty parties
Dubai faces scrutiny over alleged "Porta-Potty" parties, where young women are reportedly lured with luxury gifts and cash into degrading sex acts. Influencer Jade received suspicious gifts, prompting warnings from followers about potential involvement in these setups.economictimes.indiatimes.com
You and I are pretty much in agreement, it's just semantics. I suspect you are right in that many in the "pedophile elites" are not into children primarily as a fetish, or maybe at all; but they've tried everything else, orgies with thicc latinas, eating sushi off of five geishas at a bathhouse, but whatever they do, it eventually grows old (no pun intended); so they're forced to escalate the perversions to the next level in order to feel that dopamine rush again.
But I am saying that it's possible that the predilection to escalate in this manner is divided evenly amongst the population, the elites are no more or less "evil" by base nature. But they have the power, and they have the opportunity. This is the human condition.
You see it with celebs all the time. Think Hugh Grant or Eddie Murphy got caught with trans hookers as their FIRST time stepping out? Hell no, those guys plowed through every pussy variation IMAGINABLE and finally hit "chick with a dick" on their bingo card.You and I are pretty much in agreement, it's just semantics. I suspect you are right in that many in the "pedophile elites" are not into children primarily as a fetish, or maybe at all; but they've tried everything else, orgies with thicc latinas, eating sushi off of five geishas at a bathhouse, but whatever they do, it eventually grows old (no pun intended); so they're forced to escalate the perversions to the next level in order to feel that dopamine rush again.
But I am saying that it's possible that the predilection to escalate in this manner is divided evenly amongst the population, the elites are no more or less "evil" by base nature. But they have the power, and they have the opportunity. This is the human condition.
Elmo says release the damn files
That's assuming the fake AI cp won't be outlawed, which it almost certainly will.On the plus side would it make the risk of actually making (or possessing) 'real' child porn or a snuff film too high and end up saving actual living humans? Or will it drive these dark fetishes even further and create an expanding market of "the real mccoy" that can hide behind AI created chaff? I think there will always be a demand for real, versus simulated, experiences and that cachet of an actual participatory event will only grow as our lives become increasingly artificial, manufactured, and, quite frankly, too comfortable to deliver any meaningful satisfaction.
This unsettling assassination scene in Michael Clayton comes to mind after so many of these recent deaths of whistleblowers. Boeing, OpenAI, Epstein's accuser, etc.
They make it look so easy: