• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Theresa May Statement: June 8th General Election requested

Status
Not open for further replies.
There's a lot more nuance in life than the website you've posted.

Also, you left out his LGBT voting record? Why is this?

Turns out we don't need EU workers after all - we have enough cherry-pickers among our own population.

C3pT2de.png


there you go
 
There's a lot more nuance in life than the website you've posted.

Also, you left out his LGBT voting record? Why is this?

Turns out we don't need EU workers after all - we have enough cherry-pickers among our own population.

I mean it says as the first line on that page that he generally votes for gay rights.

That website is good for simple stuff but you do have to dig in to understand the whys and wherefores.

This is just smear stuff, good to see that the marching orders are already out and folks are scared of the party run by a Preston lad. :)
 
He's not liberal in any sense of the word and they openly support the Tories.

I think you need to go check what the definition of liberal means. We're not the USA, and the lib dems are absolutely liberal.

Liberal doesn't mean progressive. That's a uniquely American perspective.
 
I foresee a shit load of SNP campaigning in places with older populations. If there is anywhere that might flip Tory up here it's probably in such places. The "Better together" drum is going to be beating loud over the next few weeks as the best way to attack the SNP.

A growing age gap: The increase in support for independence in recent years has been most marked among younger people. As a result, there is now a very large age gap in support for independence; 72% of 16-24 year olds back independence compared with just 26% of people aged 65 and over.

This means that, as today's older voters come to the end of their lives, a majority for independence could emerge simply with the passage of time. Waiting a little longer to hold another independence referendum might have been in the SNP's interests.
The author of the report, John Curtice, a Senior Research Fellow at ScotCen said, "The nationalist movement in Scotland has never been stronger electorally.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-39265997

Unlike some GAFers have said on here this is not a reason to exclude old people from voting, but trying extra hard to engage with them. It's not easy, even just studying psychology for a few years bombards me with how difficult it can be to influence an older mind. Politics ain't easy though, Mr Corbyn and Co are finding that out.

What is tragic to see, though, is young minds, which many on GAF will be, shouting about how they're staying at home or not voting in protest. That is one way to shoot yourself in the foot compared to 'old people'. They'll wheel themselves out of nursing homes to get down and vote. The very groundwork to getting change is to vote every single time you are able to vote, regardless of how bleak things are, and that will ingrain a positive mantra in your psyche and those around you.

Only if we revert to the previous timeline.

El Psy Kongroo.
 
The polls might be in favour of Conservatives but maybe this wont just be your normal GE after the Brexit vote hopefully a lot more people actually vote.... if your in a Con seat then vote for the party in second

A vote for Lib Dems/Lab even if they dont win is better than voting no one as then we are guarenteed to end up with Conservatives
 
I think you need to go check what the definition of liberal means. We're not the USA, and the lib dems are absolutely liberal.

Liberal doesn't mean progressive. That's a uniquely American perspective.

Liberal Democrat means progressive. You are not going to find many libertarians or small-state compassionate conservatives with us.
 
what the fuck do we do.

if labour wins (they won't) and brexit goes tits up labour is dead.
if labour wins and if brexit goes well then thats good?
if labour loses they are dead.
if the tories win and brexit fucks up the tories can be bludgeoned with causing a mess with brexit.
if the tories win and brexit goes well then i'd argue thats overall good.

the UK needs a left alliance

but then i'd be worried of a retaliatory right alliance.

my outlook on life and society is practically dead :(

make sure to vote we need to fight for our values as hard as we can. you may not like corbyn but surely we can agree that the conservaties being in power is bad for our country and bad for our people, our friends, families and acquaintances.
 
I mean it says as the first line on that page that he generally votes for gay rights.

This is just smear stuff, good to see that the marching orders are already out and folks are scared of the party run by a Preston lad. :)

Smearing the guy? It's all true! I just don't see how anyone could vote for someone who thinks like that but yes he's a top lad from Preston who has not ruled out going into another coalition with the Tories.
 
I foresee a shit load of SNP campaigning in places with older populations. If there is anywhere that might flip Tory up here it's probably in such places. The "Better together" drum is going to be beating loud over the next few weeks as the best way to attack the SNP.



http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-39265997

Unlike some GAFers have said on here this is not a reason to exclude old people from voting, but trying extra hard to engage with them. It's not easy, even just studying psychology for a few years bombards me with how difficult it can be to influence an older mind. Politics ain't easy though, Mr Corbyn and Co are finding that out.

What is tragic to see, though, is young minds, which many on GAF will be, shouting about how they're staying at home or not voting in protest. That is one way to shoot yourself in the foot compared to 'old people'. They'll wheel themselves out of nursing homes to get down and vote. The very groundwork to getting change is to vote every single time you are able to vote, regardless of how bleak things are, and that will ingrain a positive mantra in your psyche.

There's no way back at all for Labour in Scotland if they even hint at an electoral quid pro quo with the Tories. I fully expect WULLIE RENNIE!!! and the Lib Dems to go along those lines though, being soft-spined quislings is that parties natural habitat.
 
Interesting post from Reddit.

That's how I've read this GE call. At the moment the Tories slim majority means they need the full backing of all party members to make sure stuff gets passed, which means having to cosy up to the right wing loons of the party. I'm sure this was done with the intention that that the Tories will return to parliament with a larger majority of moderates, she can then ignore the Jacob Rees-Moggs and John Redwoods of the party, and pursue a more moderate Brexit with access to the SM.
 
Smearing the guy? It's all true! I just don't see how anyone could vote for someone who thinks like that but yes he's a top lad from Preston who has not ruled out going into another coalition with the Tories.

Why is going into coalition with the Tories such a bad thing? If they were in coalition with the Tories now, brexit wouldn't have happened.
 
So waz happening? Brexit can be stopped?

Nope.

It's more like a question of how much unfiltered power we're willing to give to Overlord May and her cabal to march into further negotiations from now on while the tight 2 yr clock is already ticking. Chances are, she'll emerge from the whole ordeal looking like she's hardly had to raise her knuckles, put her hands up and say "ah well, guess they weren't willing to concede to our demands. Let's row the island a further fifteen miles out to sea and make it a hard Brexit, lads".
 
Liberal Democrat means progressive. You are not going to find many libertarians or small-state compassionate conservatives with us.

Well, maybe not at the moment, party of protest and all that. Thing is, with UKIP now, a lot of protest voters got to go there instead, while the Tories ate up a good chunk of the small c conservatives in 2015.

Part of what will make this election weird is that the usual dynamics aren't in play anymore.
 
That's how I've read this GE call. At the moment the Tories slim majority means they need the full backing of all party members to make sure stuff gets passed, which means having to cosy up to the right wing loons of the party. I'm sure this was done with the intention that that the Tories will return to parliament with a larger majority of moderates, she can then ignore the Jacob Rees-Moggs and John Redwoods of the party, and pursue a more moderate Brexit with access to the SM.

As one of his constituents, I'd love any outcome that involves ignoring Redwood
 
He abstained in the vote concerning equal marriage.

He later said he regretted doing it but eh.

He abstained on second reading, which he regrets, and he voted for the final bill.

There isn't an eh. He's the head of the most pro-LGBT party in British politics. Being jittery around Christians is understandable but Farron would not be where he is now if he wasn't pro-LGBT.

He's not going to suddenly go insane if he became PM, and the party would not let him even if he did.
 
Yeah, they've really handed the SNP that one

Outside of the borders and East Renfrewshire I don't really see much scope for the Tories to pick up seats. Maybe one of the Edinburgh seat.

People forgot for all their 'resurgence' at Holyrood, they pretty much got stomped on all the FPTP elections in 2016.

This a cross post from UKPOLGAF

Looking at it, there 7 constituencies which you'd think could conceivably change.

Renfrewshire East - SNP have a 3700 lead over labour
Orkney/Shetland - Lib Dem have 820 vote lead over SNP
Berwick/Roxburgh/Selkirk - SNP have 330 vote lead over Tories
Dumfrieshire/Clydesdale/Tweedale - Tory 790 vote lead over SNP
Dunbartonshire East - SNP 2100 vote lead over Lib Dems
Edinburgh South - Labour 2600 vote lead over SNP
Edinburgh West - SNP 3200 vote lead over Lib Dem

In most of the other Constituencies SNP have over 50% of the votes, or very high 40+% which means tactical voting wouldn't make any real difference unless it's a real swing election or SNP turnout is well down (I don't see either occurring). I think the SNP have a good chance to lose Berwick, Dumfries, Renfrewshire and Dumbartonshire East and maybe pick up Orkney and Edinburgh South.

Probably worst case for the SNP is 50-52 seats and best case is probably 56.
 
what the fuck do we do.

if labour wins (they won't) and brexit goes tits up labour is dead.
if labour wins and if brexit goes well then thats good?
if labour loses they are dead.
if the tories win and brexit fucks up the tories can be bludgeoned with causing a mess with brexit.
if the tories win and brexit goes well then id argue thats overall good.

the UK needs a left alliance

but then id be worried of a retaliatory right alliance.
We basically need a coalition type scenario to keep the tories honest throughout this process and then deal with the aftermath of that. Tories having total control is a bad idea. Corbyn is an incompetent fool and thus Labour having total control is a bad idea as unlikely as that is to happen. best case is slimmer to no majority and corbyn out (but that seems like a bit of oxymoron at this point) or just slimmer majority that way whoevers in charge won't be able pass any and all bullshit they want.
 
There's no way back at all for Labour in Scotland if they even hint at an electoral quid pro quo with the Tories. I fully expect WULLIE RENNIE!!! and the Lib Dems to go along those lines though, being soft-spined quislings is that parties natural habitat.

Nope, but if anything will stir Unionist support up here it's the very real concern indyref2 might indeed succeed this time. So expect to see people in their 90's with one foot in the grave loaded onto buses to get down and vote Conservative in the GE. If any seats are getting flipped up here they are going Tory, not Labour. As much as 'Scotland' hates the Tories, and was Labour in the recent past, apathy for Labour is at such a high up here now there might well be a chance for the Conservatives to gain back seats as a protest against the Union being under threat. At one time you could have said Labour would pick up the votes against Scottish independence, but now it really looks like it'll be the Tories. Shows you how fucked Labour is UK wide.

The SNP have to campaign hard in areas with high older populations. Ayrshire is one such place (where I live). We nearly flipped the local elections to SNP last year, wiping out a Tory stronghold to hundreds of votes instead of thousands. It will be interesting to see if it can be flipped this local election which is coming up before the GE. Lots of students around where I live, which is definitely helping turn the tides (the young vs old mindset of pro independence a big player here). The SNP have done well to appeal to the younger adults, but they still face a lot of resistance from the older voters. Scare them around pensions and they'll crumble (and there is a lot of Unionist support in general as it's the UK they know).

All of this is a blessing for Ruth Davidson to avoid the rape clause scandal.
 
Guys, let's be real - Tim Farron is leader of a "major" party because he was one of seven people in a room who weren't Nick Clegg (and even then, serious consideration was given to Nick Clegg). He's not Barack Obama and if it weren't for Brexit we'd be taking odds on the Liberal Democrats disappearing entirely.

but then id be worried of a retaliatory right alliance.

Between the Tories and... the DUP?

The reason a progressive alliance can't work is fourfold:

1) There is a progressive alliance - it's called the Labour Party.
2) Nobody trusts the Lib Dems, and they will run candidates against you in seats you could win and then complain when you do the same.
3) The Greens have one seat. This could jump up to two or reduce to zero.
4) Leftists don't like each other and will fight like a bag of cats at the slightest provocation.

The reason a right wing alliance can't work:

1) There is one - it's called the Conservative Party and it just ate UKIP.
 
Conservatives.

Part of the problem for May is that her current majority in Parliament is rather small. So if backbenchers want to challenge her, they don't need that many to go against the party line and deny her the majority of votes needed to pass legislation. Meanwhile, polling suggests that Labour's popularity has basically collapsed unser Corbyn's leadership. So she's hoping to grab more seats in Parliament, making it easier to pass legislation unchallenged. It also removes one of the criticisms that has dogged her - that her Prime Ministership was not approved by the country at large.

Take a look at the current poll numbers and it will become clear why she's calling an election

The thing is a) Labour aren't popular, b) Labour aren't anti-Brexit and c) Theresa May is the leader of the Conservatives.

The Conservatives currently have a small majority. This puts May in a unstable position due to the threat of rebellion by her MP's.

By holding an election she is gambling that she can get a bigger majority.

She only has a very small majority, which means that she is being held hostage by both centrist Tories and the hard right backbenchers who's votes she needs to be able to get anything done.

Recent example of this was that she had to u-turn on parts of her budget because some right wingers were moaning that it would de-incentives small business owners.

Calling an election when she has incredible popularity will give her an absolutely huge majority and allow her to have more space to make her own decisions rather than being hijacked by these fringe groups.

There is some level of hypocrisy that she'll have to get through given that she said she wouldn't do this, but given her popularity it probably won't be an issue and it's a politically very clever plan. The markets like it to, the £ has shot up since.
Thank you, everyone!
 
Liberal Democrat means progressive. You are not going to find many libertarians or small-state compassionate conservatives with us.

I didn't mean it as a critiscm. But liberal outside the states has a different meaning. The lib dems are not just just a more left wing version of labour (heck, the orange bookers still exist in some form!).

Liberal in economic terms, for example, means very different things.
 
He abstained on second reading, which he regrets, and he voted for the final bill.

There isn't an eh. He's the head of the most pro-LGBT party in British politics. Being jittery around Christians is understandable but Farron would not be where he is now if he wasn't pro-LGBT.

He's not going to suddenly go insane if he became PM, and the party would not let him even if he did.

Yep, there's no candidate without some skeletons in the closet. Given how terrible Tory rule is, I will happily vote for any party that can beat them. Remember the lesson from America... ."but her emails" indeed.
 
Labour should look to the future and steer hard into the wave of populism around at the moment. Get Michael Sheen elected as an MP and put him up for leader when Corbyn goes. Elections aren't about policy, they're about personality.

sheenBlair_1983514c.jpg


Have Gary Lineker run whilst you're at it. It's not like things could get any worse.
 
Man I wish the right Miliband brother was in charge of labour and not Corbyn. This could have been a huge opportunity. Folks need to mobilise those that are normally apathetic towards politics.
 
So do I go vote for my long term (anti-Corbyn) Labour MP who voted against Article 50 against the whip in my London seat or protest vote Lib Dem? Choices, choices. Remainers better turn out for this one.

18-35's don't vote reliably however so we're still fucked. JUST GO AND VOTE FFS.
 
So do I go vote for my long term (anti-Corbyn) Labour MP who voted against Article 50 against the whip in my London seat or protest vote Lib Dem? Choices, choices. Remainers better turn out for this one.

18-35's don't vote reliably however so we're still fucked. JUST GO AND VOTE FFS.

It's first past the post, so vote for whoever is most likely to beat the candidate you hate the most
 
No TV debates this time. https://t.co/b0ZWSnd85b

Theresa May is not a huge fan of these sorts of encounters and her team think they open up risks that don't need to be taken. So the 2017 general election will make the 2015 one look like "access all areas" as far as the Tories are concerned.

My fee fees can't handle being challenged on National TV!

Said like a true career politician without a spine who doesn't want to be asked "hard questions".

Not that Corbyn is any good in debates, but that's beside the point. May can't handle being challenged without losing her shit. Politicians are supposed to "love" debating and standing up for what they believe in. That's if they have morals and aren't just in it for the money and power.
 
That's how I've read this GE call. At the moment the Tories slim majority means they need the full backing of all party members to make sure stuff gets passed, which means having to cosy up to the right wing loons of the party. I'm sure this was done with the intention that that the Tories will return to parliament with a larger majority of moderates, she can then ignore the Jacob Rees-Moggs and John Redwoods of the party, and pursue a more moderate Brexit with access to the SM.

The Tory party isn't going to elect more moderates. It's been quite clear since the Brexit vote that the vast majority of the party has gone on full.hard Brexit mode - and the MPs have always been more moderate than the base that will be selecting the potential MPs for this election.

May will have *more* lunatics, not less. But it does mean she won't have to balance the two - the moderates can be safely ignored now. Remember, her aim isn't about getting the best deal, it's about getting good headlines and press and being in power.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom