The problem is that it really doesn't matter what the US. The rest of the world sill builds coal plants.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/01/...coal-plants-climate-change.html?smid=tw-share
To me, the root cause is basically abandoning nuclear energy. I'm not saying that doesn't have drawbacks, but many of those were caused because of irrational fear of nuclear energy.
By not building more modern nuclear plants, safer, cleaner ones to replace the older ones, and continuing to user the older, more risk prone ones, we're just asking for trouble. But turning fears into reality by relying on those older plants which will inevitably have problems, because no matter how much you maintain them, they are just getting older and older and older..
We're essentially locked into that change now though. That's if we clean up our act now. Things are going to get worse than predicted, not better baring some magical moment where people come to their senses on the matter in the immediate future.
Exactly.The problem is you have to believe in climate change and be willing to put in the huge amount of money, R&D, time and labor into these huge undertakings.
A few years ago I was living maybe 100 feet from Biscayne Bay. One day it rained for a few hours yet there was maybe 5 feet of water all over the area. My car was basically under water. The building next to mine wasn't elevated enough and people had 3 feet of water in their apartment. If a bad hurricane with a lot of rain comes again, hate to say it, but it's gonna devastate Miami, again, this time from flooding, especially on the beaches and Downtown. Dade County made a lot of adjustments to construction standards, but only after Andrew. Unfortunately that's what I think it will take.
High rises will be fine at least!
By 2100? The 1 meter rise is going to be about accurate (+/- .5 meters), based on our current emissions by most of those who studied the topic. I can link to resources if you'd like. Even if we reduced emissions greatly, the majority of that would still happen. It's just future (ie past 2100) sea level rise will be lesser or greater depending on our actions today.
It still doesn't change my point that the guy who was part of the Q&A section was using some serious hyperbole. It's something that people need to be careful of, especially on an issue like climate change.
The part of Florida that ensured Trump's victory will probably be glad when South Florida sinks.
That's too bad, goodbye Florida.
He's right Miami will be lost. According to local scientists the rock underneath Miami is a type of pourus limestone that absorbs water as a sponge instead of rock like in the Netherlands that works as a underground barrier. It doesn't matter how many seawalls Miami builds the water will come from underneath the ground.
The difference is that Florida is made of porous limestone. Even if you build a dike, water can seep up from the ground.Nothing can be done to save Miami is a bit much. Has this dude never heard of Holland?
I'm okay with this so as long as Palm Beach gets flooded too.
Source? A scientific paper, preferably.
Source? A scientific paper, preferably.
I was coincidentally reading about Miami and its sea level problems before this thread popped up, and here's a lengthy article about how that 3ft rise can cause a host of other problems that isn't just how much of Miami will be underwater by then.Here's 4 ft of sea level rise. The 1m sea level rise would be between this and the previous picture. Bad, certainly but it's a far cry from "Miami being lost", as he claimed.
That's messed up. Most of my family lives in Florida and they don't support this anti climate shit.
The answer is obvious. Build a Jetsons-esque sky city with the high rises as a foundation.High rises will be fine at least!
Yes.are you asking about the porous limestone bit or what in particular?
For a claim as serious as Miami "being underwater", I'll need strong evidence for (extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and all that). I don't doubt submergence (geologic activity sinking land) is pretty common in the South East, which is what's happening in New Orleans, for example, but I don't know if that's the case in Miami.I don't really have a source. Living in South Florida for a long time you read local newspapers and the like from local sources that all say the same thing.
1. That Miami is going to be underwater because of the limestone.
2. Miami has no sand and their scrambling to find sand.
I was coincidentally reading about Miami and its sea level problems before this thread popped up, and here's a lengthy article about how that 3ft rise can cause a host of other problems that isn't just how much of Miami will be underwater by then.
Issues like freshwater, high tides, storms, the beaches (which is a heavy source of income via tourism), and so on.
The NOAA map shows how much land will be lost to the sea, but it doesn't show how much land will continue to suffer from frequent flooding.
They'll probably put up a wall.
Can't, bedrock isn't suitable.
The only thing in the interview I really disagree with is that the US might lose out on the economic advantages of solar and wind. For as short sighted as our politicians are now, US businesses see the long term advantages of renewable energy and will continue to invest, and hopefully sell, to other countries
I was born and raised there. Doesn't mean it's not a shithole.
I've lived in Miami for most of my life. Being swallowed by the sea is a fitting end for such a hell hole
/edgelord
We were very afraid the United States would stay in the Paris accord, but sabotage it from the inside. Now with the US out, this gives other countries a chance to lead. And we know that now the economics are driving clean renewable energy deployment around the world, and that countries like China are taking major steps to become global leaders.]
Don't forget all of Florida rests on an extremely porous karst limestone peninsula; once sea levels rise, salt water is going to intrude into the aquifer, eliminating the main source of fresh water.
So in addition to holding back three feet of sea water, you also need a massive desalination process, storm water collection, tight water conservation, wastewater reuse and management (because salt water in the sewer systems is another wrinkle for water treatment) and a whole bunch of other crap to ensure fresh drinking water.
All of that comes with a huge price tag, so eventually coastal Florida will just be too expensive to inhabit.
To this point, the Netherlands are supplied with fresh water from several alpine rivers, and won't have that problem.
They'll probably put up a wall.
Here in the Netherlands we did that and it is working quite well! Half our country is below sea level but we are still dry!
Nothing can be done to save Miami is a bit much. Has this dude never heard of Holland?
Didn't Florida vote for Trump? I guess they voted for their own displacement.
I've lived in Miami for most of my life. Being swallowed by the sea is a fitting end for such a hell hole
/edgelord
Guess who didn't vote for Trump? The actual cities in Florida like Miami, FTL, WPB, Tampa, Orlando, Gainesville & Tallahassee . Totals were 4,605,515 DT to 4,485,745 H.R.C. --- Meanwhile, Johnson got 206,007 votes X(
Can you guys manage sea levels rising 1m?
I've never understood comments like this. What the hell is wrong with Miami. It's expensive as hell yes, but it has every form of entertainment, food, and shit to do for fun that you would want as a human being.
When people post shit comments like this it makes no sense.
Jacksonville continues to be trash.Guess who didn't vote for Trump? The actual cities in Florida like Miami, FTL, WPB, Tampa, Orlando, Gainesville & Tallahassee . Totals were 4,605,515 DT to 4,485,745 H.R.C. --- Meanwhile, Johnson got 206,007 votes X(
I've never understood comments like this. What the hell is wrong with Miami. It's expensive as hell yes, but it has every form of entertainment, food, and shit to do for fun that you would want as a human being.
When people post shit comments like this it makes no sense.
As someone living in Tampa (west coast of Florida), I am not incredibly appreciative of the post condemning Florida. I am a New Yorker by birth, and was embarrassed that this clown from my home state was elected and Florida went along with him. Hillsborough County went Blue, and we despise the guy. We also despise Rick Scott (current governor), so basically telling all of us to get fucked is pretty foul. As much as I shake my head at the South (Louisiana, North Carolina, Texas, Mississippi, Tennessee, etc), I won't condemn the people trying to make a difference. I doubt Miami can be saved without some massive shifts in local and state government, and I don't see that happening anytime soon. I just pray the effects will be mitigated, and people of lower socioeconomic circumstances can be protected as they will be the most vulnerable.
They are still building condos and hotels one the god damned sand as we speak down in miami. city's fucked.
thank you for both of these posts
much better than this one
They'll probably put up a wall.
I agree with you 100% but I will agree it's crazy just how many high rises are going up at this very moment if not for the traffic alone. I work at the port of Miami and drive thru downtown every day and there are at least 6 high rises going up concurrently within blocks of each other. But again I'm more concerned with the traffic situation.
Good riddance
Jacksonville continues to be trash.
Save south beach. Let the rest sink.
The Netherlands doesn't have a rocky soil. It's a swamp. Peat may absorb water better than limestone, but yeah just building a dike is not enough. You need desalination, ground water control, lots of sand and other measures. The town of Gouda (from the cheese) is sinking into the ground at such a rate that they started building roads on Styrofoam. Miami will have to take similar measures. The problem of course isHe's right Miami will be lost. According to local scientists the rock underneath Miami is a type of pourus limestone that absorbs water as a sponge instead of rock like in the Netherlands that works as a underground barrier. It doesn't matter how many seawalls Miami builds the water will come from underneath the ground.
It requires serious tax money and I can see constituents looking away until it's too late and then still vote Republican because they act the most indignant over the situation (water) that arose.Republicans are a force of nature even the Dutch would have difficulty dealing with.
"Build a sea wall? With MY TAX MONEY?"
Unless it performs double-duty of keeping Mexicans out, it's not happening.
Time to Bioshock MiamiHow well would a sea wall work in an area that gets depressions, storms, and hurricanes fairly regularly?