Corrik
Member
This is why cops whenever they have a reasonable justification to shoot do and should take the shot if they feel it is the right course of action.
A cop shouldn't have to die or an innocent bystander before a suspect is considered a threat to life. This office by not shooting at the sign of threat is now dead. There will not be protests in his name. He will not be remembered. He will not be anything but an empty space in that family that will forever scar that family. And for what? For trying to do his job to the best of his ability and for erring on the side of the suspect.
An officer should never have to choose between his own life and that of a suspect that is justifiably and reasonably possible to be armed and/or dangerous.
That doesn't even account for the innocent bystander who died. A woman at her own house who did nothing.
This is why I said I felt the Antwon Rose shooting would result in an innocent verdict for the cop. The cop with all information provided had every reason to suspect that the suspect there was possibly armed and possibly dangerous due to the likelihood he was in a drive-by shooting previous to that and guns were openly present on the ground.
If that cop hadn't shot and Rose had been armed, it could have resulted in innocent lives lost. Thus, I understand the cop's decision there.
What are your thoughts?
A cop shouldn't have to die or an innocent bystander before a suspect is considered a threat to life. This office by not shooting at the sign of threat is now dead. There will not be protests in his name. He will not be remembered. He will not be anything but an empty space in that family that will forever scar that family. And for what? For trying to do his job to the best of his ability and for erring on the side of the suspect.
An officer should never have to choose between his own life and that of a suspect that is justifiably and reasonably possible to be armed and/or dangerous.
That doesn't even account for the innocent bystander who died. A woman at her own house who did nothing.
This is why I said I felt the Antwon Rose shooting would result in an innocent verdict for the cop. The cop with all information provided had every reason to suspect that the suspect there was possibly armed and possibly dangerous due to the likelihood he was in a drive-by shooting previous to that and guns were openly present on the ground.
If that cop hadn't shot and Rose had been armed, it could have resulted in innocent lives lost. Thus, I understand the cop's decision there.
What are your thoughts?