Mike Kensil has been removed for the NFL operations website
For background, I believe it was Friday when he was reported to have been the one who leaked the incorrect info the Chris Mortensen.
Mike Kensil has been removed for the NFL operations website
For background, I believe it was Friday when he was reported to have been the one who leaked the incorrect info the Chris Mortensen.
rofl, NFL trying to sweep it under the rug during the weekend, yet announces their shit in prime time for the world to hear.
The Patriots have a perfect opportunity to shift the narrative, they need to go on full out attack now and pounce to get this into the news cycle.
If anything comes out of this I really hope Gillette becomes this hostile stadium for the away team. Man I really miss Foxboro Stadium where people weren't afraid to stand up and cheer.
Mike Kensil has been removed for the NFL operations website
For background, I believe it was Friday when he was reported to have been the one who leaked the incorrect info the Chris Mortensen.
This move reminds me of how the patriots indefinitely suspended Jim McNally and John Jastremski to try and sweep deflategate under the rug, and to shift the narrative away from Brady.
right, because it's odd for companies to suspend people who are under investigation with possible wrongdoing.
Tom Brady was also under investigation for possible wrong doing. Is it odd the company didn't suspend him and just two people that on one had ever heard of before.
This move reminds me of how the patriots indefinitely suspended Jim McNally and John Jastremski to try and sweep deflategate under the rug, and to shift the narrative away from Brady.
For those asking why Patriots suspended two employees if those two did nothing wrong, as New England claims: NFL asked Pats to suspend them prior to discipline being handed down, per a league source in New York. New England obliged with the NFL's request.
Mike Kensil has been removed for the NFL operations website
For background, I believe it was Friday when he was reported to have been the one who leaked the incorrect info the Chris Mortensen.
https://twitter.com/benvolin/status/627898675080114176BenVolin: Not only has nothing changed with Mike Kensil, but he was not on that NFL Ops website to begin with.
He was never on that website:
https://twitter.com/benvolin/status/627898675080114176
See Google's cache version from July 26: http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...s/the-nfl-ops-team/+&cd=1&hl=de&ct=clnk&gl=de
Volin is absolute garbage. I'll wait for a legit source before trusting anything that guy has to say.
I have posted a link to Google's cache version of the same site from July 26 (i.e. a week ago), that shows Kensil was never on that website.
Listen, I went back . . . and I cant go through too many of the steps I took because it wasnt just a single source,
If anything comes out of this I really hope Gillette becomes this hostile stadium for the away team. Man I really miss Foxboro Stadium where people weren't afraid to stand up and cheer.
Free him from what exactly? The guy has cheated well before the AFC Title game last year according to the Wells Report by ordering the deflation of game balls for the past few years, he lied to NFL investigators, and he destroyed evidence to cover it up.
He, and his organization with a history of cheating, should be grateful that he only received a four game suspension.
Free him from what exactly? The guy has cheated well before the AFC Title game last year according to the Wells Report by ordering the deflation of game balls for the past few years, he lied to NFL investigators, and he destroyed evidence to cover it up.
He, and his organization with a history of cheating, should be grateful that he only received a four game suspension.
I don't know why everyone thinks it was Kensil, or even only Kensil. Mortensen states it was multiple league sources.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/08/02/in-january-mort-told-weei-he-reconfirmed-psi-info/
But Dennis’s certainty in fingering Kensil as the main culprit is intriguing, because the host is known to have a tight relationship with the Kraft family dating back to his days as a sports anchor on Channel 7, when Robert Kraft was one of the station’s owners. The friendship, particularly with Robert and Jonathan Kraft, is an occasional source of humor on the show.
Dennis believes that Kensil told high-ranking NFL executives Jeff Pash (vice president and executive counsel), Troy Vincent (vice president of football operations) and Dave Gardi (senior vice president of football operations) that 11 of the 12 footballs were deflated to 2 pounds per square inch below the minimum, and that trio passed the information along to Mortensen, thus allowing him to report he had multiple sources.
If Dennis believes this, it’s a safe bet the Krafts do as well. Too bad we didn’t get to hear him confront Mortensen with his theory. The reporter never would have given up the source – he’d never be fed a morsel of information from anyone again if he did, and that’s his lifeblood as an “insider.”
Free him from what exactly? The guy has cheated well before the AFC Title game last year according to the Wells Report by ordering the deflation of game balls for the past few years, he lied to NFL investigators, and he destroyed evidence to cover it up.
He, and his organization with a history of cheating, should be grateful that he only received a four game suspension.
People think it's Kensil because a WEEI show host claimed to have a source saying that it was Kensil who leaked it to the NFL. The person who leaked it supposedly has a tight relationship with the Kraft family, and some over a Pats forum were speculating that his source could possibly be Jonathan Kraft. Let me see if I can find the links.
Edit: Found the Link
Dennis isn't very tight into the scene. It was obvious he got it somewhere else. Mort on the other hand looked like an obvious coward because he needed the bigger outlet.
No reporter wants to confirm or deny the name of a source. The right thing for them to do is say nothing.
No reporter wants to confirm or deny the name of a source. The right thing for them to do is say nothing.
But that's not what he did. He reported some false PSI numbers that greatly influenced public perception of this whole thing.
He was lied too, at the time he reported he had no idea it was wrong especially if he sources were high up in the NFL, and since it has been reported as wrong he probably is being asked by ESPN to keep his mouth shut. He really is stuck between and rock and hard place.
He should out his source. Whoever it was is a liar and manipulated EPSN for their own purposes. Why would they want to protect that?
Boy the NFL really acted quickly to correct the report that Kensil had been removed as VP of Game Ops. Very impressive how quickly they refudiated the report, on a Sunday to boot!
What a sham.
ESPN is silent as a mouse.
No one can back down.http://www.stradleylaw.com/deflategate-legal-faqs-settlement/
She suggests the best result for all parties is no suspension, no admission of guilt and maybe a fine.
No one can back down.
If NFL backs down it encourages more players to take them to court. The players gave the commish these powers. He is going to keep using them until a new CBA changes something.
If the Pats back down they are labeled as cheaters x 2.
Why would Goodell ever agree to that?The major claim by the patriots is that he isn't abiding by the CBA. They don't want him to fix the agreement, they want him to stick to it.
You can take a nap while the Pats are on D. That's saying something. The fans do seem to show up for the AFC championships though....70s. .
Why would Goodell ever agree to that?
He would only agree if he knew he was going to lose. Even then I think he would rather get a decision saying that instead of admitting it.
I only see a settlement if Brady admits to it to save 1-2 games of the suspension.
No one can back down.
If NFL backs down it encourages more players to take them to court. The players gave the commish these powers. He is going to keep using them until a new CBA changes something.
If the Pats back down they are labeled as cheaters x 2.
Free him from what exactly? The guy has cheated well before the AFC Title game last year according to the Wells Report by ordering the deflation of game balls for the past few years, he lied to NFL investigators, and he destroyed evidence to cover it up.
He, and his organization with a history of cheating, should be grateful that he only received a four game suspension.
Tommy Buns needs a better attorney.
Tommy Buns needs a better attorney.
They start out by seemingly admitting the Pats cheated but don't want that to extend to Tom because they can't prove he was aware or even generally aware of anything going down and further that there is no precedent for being punished for being aware of a wrongdoing.
This is not what my Pats friends have been telling me for the past few months so Tom must have gotten a moron attorney.
Page 10What are you referring to?
The reason I'm making this point is the
2 reason we are about to tell you why we thing the
3 Wells report is wrong, we think the Wells report
4 doesn't answer or doesn't provide the basis for any
5 discipline of the player.
6 This is wholly apart from what you did on the
7 team, because on the team, the Wells report made
8 very different findings, that it was more probable
9 than not that something occurred and that's what
10 they said and the team was responsible. But for the
11 player, it was very, very different and I assume
12 while Mr. Wells testifies, I assume that was a
13 deliberate decision he made.
14 Had he been able to conclude that it was more
15 probable than not that Mr. Brady participated in any
16 kind of inappropriate activities, that's what he
17 would have said in his findings. He did not say
18 that. So before I get into the facts, I just felt
19 compelled to make that context point, which we think
20 is very important./QUOTE]
I didn't read the whole transcript. Just skimmed the beginning so maybe they said the entire report should be thrown out later on, but that is not how they explained their argument at the outset.
Page 10
The reason I'm making this point is the
2 reason we are about to tell you why we thing the
3 Wells report is wrong, we think the Wells report
4 doesn't answer or doesn't provide the basis for any
5 discipline of the player.
6 This is wholly apart from what you did on the
7 team, because on the team, the Wells report made
8 very different findings, that it was more probable
9 than not that something occurred and that's what
10 they said and the team was responsible. But for the
11 player, it was very, very different and I assume
12 while Mr. Wells testifies, I assume that was a
13 deliberate decision he made.
14 Had he been able to conclude that it was more
15 probable than not that Mr. Brady participated in any
16 kind of inappropriate activities, that's what he
17 would have said in his findings. He did not say
18 that. So before I get into the facts, I just felt
19 compelled to make that context point, which we think
20 is very important./QUOTE]
I didn't read the whole transcript. Just skimmed the beginning so maybe they said the entire report should be thrown out later on, but that is not how they explained their argument at the outset.
I really don't think that says what you seem to think it does. That isn't saying they think any of the conclusions are valid at all.