EXXON MOBIL MAY soon have a greater hand in shaping the science used to develop major environmental regulations.
The published list of potential names for the Science Advisory Board and the EPA Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee includes many industry representatives and consultants. The panels are typically composed primarily of independent academics and researchers charged with reviewing agency science and advising the Environmental Protection Agency on major policy decisions.
While industry has always had a voice on those panels, comments from the Trump administration and the potential new appointees suggest the balance may soon change in favor of greater power for regulated companies, particularly the oil and gas industries.
The long list of potential new advisory board members includes officials from Exxon Mobil, Phillips 66, Alcoa, Noble Energy, Total, and the American Chemistry Council, a lobbying group for the chemical industry. EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt will make the final determination to select the members of the panels.
In a move widely viewed as an attempt to make room for more industry representatives, the EPA in May dismissed at least five academic researchers from their position on the SAB. ”The administrator believes we should have people on this board who understand the impact of regulations on the regulated community," an EPA spokesperson told the New York Times.
Steve Milloy, a former Trump transition official, told E&E News that he believes the scientific advisory panels will be significantly ”reconstituted" to include more industry representatives and those in the industry-backed think tank world that have held hostile views to previous EPA decisions.
The push to remake the panels comes as industrial lobbyists and their allies in Congress have pushed to radically reshape the science used in environmental policymaking.
In March, the House of Representatives passed a pair of bills designed to change the way scientific research is used to formulate EPA policies.
The Honest Act, sponsored by Republican Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, would prevent the EPA from relying on the type of epidemiological research that was used to regulate leaded gas and the pesticide DDT.
Another bill, the EPA Science Advisory Board Reform Act, allows industry representatives to serve on the SAB and other scientific research panels without receiving a special waiver.
https://theintercept.com/2017/09/22/epa-science-exxon-mobil-climate-change/
Jeffery Lewis, current exxon mobile lobbylist, has challenged Air pollution regulations in the past.
Richard Belzer, Exxon mobile consultant who has challenged Obama admin's already lenient Ozone scientific findings in the past
Merl Lindstrom, vice president of technology at oil refinery company Vice 66
Sidney Marlborough, Environmental toxocologist at fracking company Noble energy
Rob Merritt, manager of Geoscience information at French oil company Total
Mark Monique, President of consumer chemicals company Savogran Co.
Laurie Shelby, vice president at Alcoa, a huge Aluminum production firm
Edwin Berry, "scientist" who compared the belief in climate change to ”Aztecs who believed they could make rain by cutting out beating hearts and rolling decapitated heads down temple steps."
Tony Cox of Cox Associates, nominated to both the SAB and CASAC boards, previously produced research for the American Chemistry Council on lung disease issues, as well as for the American Petroleum Institute, a lobby group for the oil industry, on the health effects associated with fine particulate matter and ozone. Exxon Mobil is a prominent member of the API.