RPGCrazied
Member
This is DOA in Congress. I hope Trump realizes this. But I'm sure, just like the transgender military ban, he is doing this for his base because his approval rating is taking a dump.
The general idea behind a successful, largely automated, society. A society that can survive the future worker displacement automation will cause.
1. It doesn't make sense economically
2. They're really just doing it to try to keep white people from being overtaken in numbers
And the ones proposing this bill of limiting immigration are...?
This is not at all the GOPs intention with this bill. Your whole argument is just trying to justify a xenophobic policy with a carrot that would sound good to a liberal but you know damn well is not in the realm of possibility for GOP government.
Or you did believe that was part of their plan for this bill and weren't being disingenuous in which case my first post stands.
I think if the us gets away with this, europe is going to start requiring visas for us citizens.
Potential cluster fuck for world travelers.
I think that's for skilled workers only, not all immigrants.
I am largely indifferent to the allowed rate of immigration, as I do not consider open borders to be a very important ethical issue in 2017, but given the core of the argument for restrictions is coming from white nationalists, not economists, this is very clearly wrong.
Good luck getting into Canada legally if you are unskilled and don't know one of the two languages.
Are you going to call them Nazis too?
This is a good point. You do not want to share the same opinion of racists and white nationalists, on pretty much anything I'd reckon.
You can get family to sponsor you, which this bill is trying to cut drastically.
Who you can sponsor
Depending on your circumstances, there are two options for who you can sponsor.
Option 1: orphaned close relatives
You can sponsor close relatives only if they meet all conditions. This means they must be:
orphaned
under 18
without a:
spouse
conjugal partner
common-law partner
related to you by blood or adoption, such as:
brothers or sisters
nephews or nieces
grandchildren
Option 2: other relative
You may sponsor one relative, related by blood or adoption, of any age if you meet all of the conditions, including:
you don't have a living relative you could sponsor instead, such as a:
spouse
common-law partner
conjugal partner
son or daughter
parent
grandparent
brother or sister
uncle or aunt
nephew or niece
you don't have any of the above-named relatives who is:
a Canadian citizen
a permanent resident
registered Indian under the Indian Act
If the relative you want to sponsor has a spouse, partner, or dependent children who will come with them to Canada you must include them on the same sponsorship application.
Other options: Express Entry
If your relative doesn't qualify for sponsorship they may still be able to come to Canada as a skilled immigrant through Express Entry. This program:
manages applications for certain economic immigration programs
selects applicants for their:
skills
experience
ability to contribute to Canada's economy
awards points to some candidates who have family living in Canada
If a country wants to continue to pay a person who immigrates away, that's up to them. Though it certainly sounds like a bad idea, and I can't imagine many countries would be interested in doing it.
We need a game show where the people who support shit like this have to gamble their citizenship against "low-quality" immigrants.
I wish. I remember coming to this country and going to high school with US born citizens who could not fucking read, my mind was blown.
IIRC that's how pensions work. Canada is more generous than European countries when it comes to working because with a job offer in any of the listed sectors you can get to stay forever.
if illegals get kicked out of the country then violent crime rates will rise in this countryI always find it interesting when people use higher grocery bills to justify mass immigration. As if the fact that businesses exploit a massive slave labor class doesn't bother them at all.
1. It does make sense economically long term, even if mass immigration is better short term.
2. I doubt too many European people would want to move to the US- since they already live in better countries. The main beneficiaries will most likely be Asians. Indians and Chinese especially.
Or any American government. Its corrupt, war mongering and incompetent. The United States is not a country with a bright future. I like the debate, but Ill be the first to admit I'm thinking more in the abstract than in American realities.
Im in favor for this.
Anything to increase the quality of migrants is a plus.
Point based on the criteria of education and skills.
Immigration should be based about you can provide immediately tot he country.
And i really dont like how many family immigration schemes that they are currently.
Couldnt care less about how bad your situation back home is
Some news organization should go and find out whether Melania would have qualify under this new rule and make a big article on it.
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/immigrate/sponsor/relatives-apply-who.asp#who_can
Canada's system is much stricter.
This isn't stricter. It clearly states you can sponsor extended family members and allows for skilled immigrant entry. It doesn't limit one in favor of the other.
You may sponsor one relative
If they get their way, dick prices are gonna skyrocket.I resurrected this thread to tell you to eat a dick and fuck off.