-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Trump states in Tweet that Clinton colluded to beat Sanders.
- Thread starter KSweeley
- Start date
- Status
Majority of the US heard the incoherent ramblings of a mentally ill elderly man, and made them their leader*.
* or didn't bother to vote to stop him
"Just cast my 3rd party vote. I'm totally confident Clinton will win."
"I also recognize that voting 3rd party takes away from Hillary. Won't make me vote for her though. I'm not voting for a candidate I dislike."
"I put a lot of weight on candidate's foreign policy as well and I think Hillary will be worse than Trump..."
"I don't make a distinction between Bush and Obama or a Trump and Hillary. In fact, I think Obama is actually WORSE than Bush. But at least with Bush, things were more overt. It's like the differences between dejure Jim Crow and defacto Jim Crow (redlining, steering, etc). Nothing really changed, but the most dangerous part of the latter is that, to some, it represented "progress" since the discrimination wasn't so overt."
"It only takes one accident. Just one. Where US downs a Russian plane or Russia downs a US plane and it could escalate. I don't think this scenario would play out now. But once Hillary gets in, I expect the chance of things getting out of control much higher."
"Basically, whether Hillary or Trump, we'll still have the same fascist elements in place and there will be the same amount of human suffering as there is now. The only difference is more people would see and be aware of it with Trump. It would be behind the scenes with Hillary (like it is with Obama)"
"She'd be Bush 3.0 though... 2.0 was Obama."
"I'm not voting in national elections anymore. I've totally given up on this (for a variety of reasons). I don't feel the need to participate any longer."
"I'm not necessarily opposed to Trump being elected..."
Wow. 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
SaviourMK2
Member
I like Bernie, but I don't want to hear the opinions of a communist traitor pedophile like Trumpy nor can he goad me.
Jorok Goldblade
Member
His projection game is on point.
Tranqueris
Banned
Trump's lawyers must be like.. "Hopefully no one will notice."
To be fair though, I think you were the first one to ask this question (I skimmed the thread). So maybe they're not wrong.
davepoobond
you can't put a price on sparks
Everything he does is projection. Even during the campaign.
"Just cast my 3rd party vote. I'm totally confident Clinton will win."
"I also recognize that voting 3rd party takes away from Hillary. Won't make me vote for her though. I'm not voting for a candidate I dislike."
"I put a lot of weight on candidate's foreign policy as well and I think Hillary will be worse than Trump..."
"I don't make a distinction between Bush and Obama or a Trump and Hillary. In fact, I think Obama is actually WORSE than Bush. But at least with Bush, things were more overt. It's like the differences between dejure Jim Crow and defacto Jim Crow (redlining, steering, etc). Nothing really changed, but the most dangerous part of the latter is that, to some, it represented "progress" since the discrimination wasn't so overt."
"It only takes one accident. Just one. Where US downs a Russian plane or Russia downs a US plane and it could escalate. I don't think this scenario would play out now. But once Hillary gets in, I expect the chance of things getting out of control much higher."
"Basically, whether Hillary or Trump, we'll still have the same fascist elements in place and there will be the same amount of human suffering as there is now. The only difference is more people would see and be aware of it with Trump. It would be behind the scenes with Hillary (like it is with Obama)"
"She'd be Bush 3.0 though... 2.0 was Obama."
"I'm not voting in national elections anymore. I've totally given up on this (for a variety of reasons). I don't feel the need to participate any longer."
"I'm not necessarily opposed to Trump being elected..."
The amount of ignorance, factually incorrect statements and selfishness is truly awful.
People like this guy make me embarrassed for voting for Bernie in the primary.
The Real Napsta
Member
That's a weird point of view.
Jesus. People like this are legitimately baffling, opinions and viewpoints bouncing all over the place but not sticking anywhere with any logic or coherence."Just cast my 3rd party vote. I'm totally confident Clinton will win."
"I also recognize that voting 3rd party takes away from Hillary. Won't make me vote for her though. I'm not voting for a candidate I dislike."
"I put a lot of weight on candidate's foreign policy as well and I think Hillary will be worse than Trump..."
"I don't make a distinction between Bush and Obama or a Trump and Hillary. In fact, I think Obama is actually WORSE than Bush. But at least with Bush, things were more overt. It's like the differences between dejure Jim Crow and defacto Jim Crow (redlining, steering, etc). Nothing really changed, but the most dangerous part of the latter is that, to some, it represented "progress" since the discrimination wasn't so overt."
"It only takes one accident. Just one. Where US downs a Russian plane or Russia downs a US plane and it could escalate. I don't think this scenario would play out now. But once Hillary gets in, I expect the chance of things getting out of control much higher."
"Basically, whether Hillary or Trump, we'll still have the same fascist elements in place and there will be the same amount of human suffering as there is now. The only difference is more people would see and be aware of it with Trump. It would be behind the scenes with Hillary (like it is with Obama)"
"She'd be Bush 3.0 though... 2.0 was Obama."
"I'm not voting in national elections anymore. I've totally given up on this (for a variety of reasons). I don't feel the need to participate any longer."
"I'm not necessarily opposed to Trump being elected..."
Prototype Viktor
Member
He always projects so maybe he's admitting to rigging the RNC
RPGCrazied
Member
Sounds like a Trump supporter to me.
ZSaberLink
Media Create Maven
Ossoff did worse in that district than Hillary did back in 2016.
Trump v. Hillary was 48-47. This one was 52-48. It was kind of worse imo... and given this is a super educated district it's kind of sad they still voted for the Republican. Unfortunately close is not enough. Clinton had plenty of close calls, but still lost. Democrats made 0 gains on any of the special elections for the seats Trump's appointees left behind.
They also spent a crap ton of money if I'm not mistaken, otherwise how would it have been the most expensive congressional race ever. The platform wasn't unified, but I wouldn't say they didn't try.
Common Knowledge
Member
So....there's going to be a leak this week of evidence Trump himself colluded with Russia, right?
SatelliteOfLove
Member
Bingo.
And what that means is:
A) He knows something's coming and what it probably will be.
B) That it's bad enough to call GOP Phantom Fears by name.
C) This comes after the Sanders investigation is revealed.
D) It will work on convincing dumbfucks, and few will point this out like we are.
Now now.. Let's not get carried away
Prototype Viktor
Member
Mark Zuckerberg is changing his name as we speak to Mark Pence Trump
There is no deeper motivation here, and he doesn't give a shit that I know he is a moron.
This is and always has been about him protecting his ego from the reality that he is thought of as a illegitimate president and he lost the popular vote. Every action he has ever taken in his life has been about his insane narcicism.
Trump is literally the easiest and most transparent person ever to analyze.
HP_Wuvcraft
Banned
Oh, I'm pretty sure this is exactly what he thinks. He sees it as not more than a deal between businesses.
Baron Doggystyle von Woof
Member
Still so surreal to see tweets like this from the President.
butzopower
proud of his butz
This dude ran for president hoping to lose so that he'd have something to bitch and complain about for the rest of his life about how unfair it was that he didn't win. And even after winning, all he wants to do is bitch and complain about how unfair it all was.
Now it is normal. This is what our abominable country voted for.
"Just cast my 3rd party vote. I'm totally confident Clinton will win."
"I also recognize that voting 3rd party takes away from Hillary. Won't make me vote for her though. I'm not voting for a candidate I dislike."
"I put a lot of weight on candidate's foreign policy as well and I think Hillary will be worse than Trump..."
"I don't make a distinction between Bush and Obama or a Trump and Hillary. In fact, I think Obama is actually WORSE than Bush. But at least with Bush, things were more overt. It's like the differences between dejure Jim Crow and defacto Jim Crow (redlining, steering, etc). Nothing really changed, but the most dangerous part of the latter is that, to some, it represented "progress" since the discrimination wasn't so overt."
"It only takes one accident. Just one. Where US downs a Russian plane or Russia downs a US plane and it could escalate. I don't think this scenario would play out now. But once Hillary gets in, I expect the chance of things getting out of control much higher."
"Basically, whether Hillary or Trump, we'll still have the same fascist elements in place and there will be the same amount of human suffering as there is now. The only difference is more people would see and be aware of it with Trump. It would be behind the scenes with Hillary (like it is with Obama)"
"She'd be Bush 3.0 though... 2.0 was Obama."
"I'm not voting in national elections anymore. I've totally given up on this (for a variety of reasons). I don't feel the need to participate any longer."
"I'm not necessarily opposed to Trump being elected..."
that poster should be ashamed
I have a tough time believing that he is purposely trying to deflect some upcoming major headline. I just think he legit lets things like that bother him and then ends up on Twitter in the morning. He doesn't seem like a smart man and everything he does appears like it comes from him slipping on a banana peel.
I'm not being played like a fiddle. For once something he said was true, or do you consider getting debate answers from the VP of the DNC to not be collusion?
Only technically because the questions received were so obviously going to be asked anyway that only a moron of the tallest order wouldn't have already prepared for them. So yea it was dumb of Donna, but like no appreciable gain was made due to that. Hillary is a legendary preparer and even a mentally handicapped individual would know a question about the flint water crisis was gonna come up in a Michigan debate.
In other words, the "collusion" - and there is zero evidence Hillary asked for these from Donna - didn't actually help her win.
You are the type that seems more concerned with how things look than how they actually are.
LilWayneSuckz
Member
How exactly did debate answers get her nominated in the primary over Bernie Sanders?...
Permanently A
Junior Member
Mueller just needs to leave Trump alone in a room for an hour, he'll blabber like a baby.
acheron_xl
Member
He just wants to devalue the meaning of the word 'collusion'.
That's not the point the point is that her campaign and the DNC in at least one instance colluded. I didn't argue that it did give her the nomination or that the information even helped her (because the answers she gave to those questions were unremarkable). The fact of the matter is in at least one instance the someone from the DNC actively attempted to help her campaign in secret aka the definition of collusion. I'm by no means a Trump supporter but the facts do support that the DNC and Clinton campaign had at least one instance of collusion. Furthermore, when this was questioned, Donna Brazille actually straight up lied about it.
How About No
Member
Wait is he implying its unfair that HE can't collude like Hillary and get away with it?? So he colluded????
Angelus Errare
Banned
All I've learned from this tweet is that he's basically admitting to collusion
Bam Bam Baklava
Member
Someone in the Sanders camp stole a bunch of the Clinton campaign data, I'd say they were even in the end.
But he is playing everyone. Nothing being discussed here is new or relevant to the future and yet look at the time and effort wasted on this that could be spent on something else.
RPGCrazied
Member
adamsappel
Member
Proof Trump doesn't read memos: He didn't call it the "Democrat Party."
TICK TICK TICK
RPGCrazied
Member
Yeah.... Fox News is going with treason isn't a crime.
lol
WiiredShawn
Member
I'm becoming titillated by Fox News' willingness to consider that collusion really happened. Hence the damage control.
C'mon, Monday.
Damn shame how that went down.
It was a town hall not a debate and that isn't collusion. Donna Brazile was an open Hillary supporter and this had nothing to do with her position at the DNC, which did not even sanction said town hall
Suikoguy
I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
But, he ALWAYS looks like he is taking a shit wherever he sits.
Democrats are a more diverse group in basically all ways.
Republicans are the party of fear of that diversity.
Democrats have a way tougher job making cohesion work.
wow
RPGCrazied
Member
Yeah, makes sense. Trump is on damage control now today too. He had to do another sit down interview with Fox & Friends(state TV).
You know he is getting desperate.
plagiarize
Banned
Hello? This is Hailun!
Member
Yes. The DNC specifically fucked over Bernie. This is unethical but unlike Trumps collusion it isn't illegal or treasonous.
plagiarize
Banned
She shouldn't have done it, but it blatantly provided zero advantage too as the question was one that was blatantly getting asked.
Knuckle Sandwich
Member
Lol. Dumb lefties will run with this like they ran with all the other shit the right pushed about Hillary. Enemy of your enemy is still your enemy.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked