https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys_of_scientists'_views_on_climate_change
"A 2016 paper - co-authored by Naomi Oreskes, Peter Doran, William Anderegg, Bart Verheggen, Ed Maibach, J. Stuart Carlton and John Cook - based on a half a dozen independent studies by the authors - reported that 90%100% of climate scientists who publish in peer-reviewed journals, had consensus that climate change can be attributed to human activity.[2]"
The regressive policies of this man will literally kill people. And what does he have to lose? He'll be dead within 80 years and not have to deal with any of the shit he causes
This has got to be the most hypocritical statement of all time.
He is doing literally EXACTLY what he's complaining about.
I really hope with Trump in power, it leads to other countries to take on bigger role in global change.
politically correct environmental monitoring
I'm going to be a science jackass right now and say that, actually, rising sea levels will cause salt water inundation around the mouth of the Potomac. So technically he's adding more water while killing anything living there. The Lincoln Reflecting Pool was already rebuilt in 2009 so it used fresh tap water instead of tidal basin water, in fact!
shit,I meant to say 10 years but my brain put down what his age would beHe'll be undoubtedly dead within 15 years. What is he, 76?
I'd say so. Although not sure how NOAA is going to end up.S-silver lining... right???
Just being petty, lol. It'll dry up plenty of other swamps elsewhere!I thought about that. Didn't work as well though.
But there are inland swamps too, so it still kind of works.
I'd say so. Although not sure how NOAA is going to end up.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys_of_scientists'_views_on_climate_change
"A 2016 paper - co-authored by Naomi Oreskes, Peter Doran, William Anderegg, Bart Verheggen, Ed Maibach, J. Stuart Carlton and John Cook - based on a half a dozen independent studies by the authors - reported that 90%100% of climate scientists who publish in peer-reviewed journals, had consensus that climate change can be attributed to human activity.[2]"
I think NOAA will be fine, and NASA for the most part should be okay (barring this idiotic decision). Repubs in Texas and other Gulf states know how important NOAA is during hurricane season and Texas senators/congressman typically go to bat for NASA.
I guess any research that contradicts the winner's agenda is politicized now/My guess is that it would be difficult to stop all ongoing Nasa programs but future programs should definitely be placed with other agencies. I believe that climate research is necessary but it has been heavily politicized, which has undermined a lot of the work that researchers have been doing. Mr Trumps decisions will be based upon solid science, not politicized science.
That's just liberal propagandahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survey...climate_change
"A 2016 paper - co-authored by Naomi Oreskes, Peter Doran, William Anderegg, Bart Verheggen, Ed Maibach, J. Stuart Carlton and John Cook - based on a half a dozen independent studies by the authors - reported that 90%100% of climate scientists who publish in peer-reviewed journals, had consensus that climate change can be attributed to human activity.[2]"
Walker is not just a fucking liar, but he's a giant hypocrite too. He wants to directly interfere with science, then immediately says politicians shouldn't interfere with science! You cannot make this shit up."Politically correct environmental monitoring" ...Now I've heard everything.
https://www.theguardian.com/environm...medium=twitter
Walker, however, claimed that doubt over the role of human activity in climate change is a view shared by half the climatologists in the world. We need good science to tell us what the reality is and science could do that if politicians didnt interfere with it.
Why does Trump want to destroy the Earth so badly?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys_of_scientists'_views_on_climate_change
"A 2016 paper - co-authored by Naomi Oreskes, Peter Doran, William Anderegg, Bart Verheggen, Ed Maibach, J. Stuart Carlton and John Cook - based on a half a dozen independent studies by the authors - reported that 90%100% of climate scientists who publish in peer-reviewed journals, had consensus that climate change can be attributed to human activity.[2]"
Trumps legacy will be mocked, feared and ridiculed as a testament of mankind's stupidity for generations to come.
The NOAA reaches the exact same conclusions as NASA considering they are kind of sister agencies. They share researchers and data with each other all the time. Does Trump think the NOAA will magically find no more warming and advise more fracking and coal dependency?
What legacy? What generations to come? What mankind?
Where's Captain Planet when you need him.
Wait so we can just find a new Earth instead?
Based Trump.