https://mises.org"Politicized Science" is some "Ministry of Truth" Orwell shit.
It wasn't politicized science.... until now, that is.
Why does Trump want to destroy the Earth so badly?
Much like the oil and industry tycoons of the 19th century, he wants to own everything.Why does Trump want to destroy the Earth so badly?
What major fuck up America. Well done.
What? Do you genuinely think the US has been doing the most to combat climate change?I really hope with Trump in power, it leads to other countries to take on bigger role in global change.
It's all economics.I swear the right wing view on climate change is to cry "lalala I can't hear you" when presented with hard evidence but this is a new low.
Rather than ignoring climate science, the Trump regime want to suppress it entirely via funding cuts. Bra-fucking-vo.
The science of climate change is not political, it is factual. How you deal with it is the political challenge. Endangering not only jobs, but lives over a political spat on how to deal with uncomfortable facts should be a red line but frankly this is a post truth world. Trump fans will likely have bought the whole anti expert worldview and thus because climate change is slow and subtle, it must not be happening. Until it totally does.
"in favor of exploration of deep space, with the president-elect having set a goal during the campaign to explore the entire solar system by the end of the century."
i do like this though, lets get off this stinking rock!
There are still a solid 84 years to go. They're going to be a hard, bad 84 years if you know, we can't breathe due to air pollution. Or if we can't build rockets on land due to rising sea levels."in favor of exploration of deep space, with the president-elect having set a goal during the campaign to explore the entire solar system by the end of the century."
i do like this though, lets get off this stinking rock!
"in favor of exploration of deep space, with the president-elect having set a goal during the campaign to explore the entire solar system by the end of the century."
i do like this though, lets get off this stinking rock!
We are actually doing both quite well. NASA just launched a weather monitoring satellite operating with NOAA using heavy payload launch systems that are fundamental in also developing systems for human and solar system exploration."in favor of exploration of deep space, with the president-elect having set a goal during the campaign to explore the entire solar system by the end of the century."
i do like this though, lets get off this stinking rock!
http://yubanet.com/scitech/noaas-goes-r-satellite-heads-to-orbit-will-improve-weather-forecasting/Beyond weather forecasting, GOES-R will be part of SARSAT, an international satellite-based search and rescue network. The satellite is carrying a special transponder that can detect distress signals from emergency beacons.
Politicized science? Give me a fucking break. YOU (republicans) were the ones that politicized it in the first place! The rest of the world has had the decency of accepting climate change as factual while you are having your little Neanderthal debates.
"in favor of exploration of deep space, with the president-elect having set a goal during the campaign to explore the entire solar system by the end of the century."
i do like this though, lets get off this stinking rock!
The rest of the world gave United States way too much influence and power.
Heck, it's probably the loner here against everyone on climate affairs.
They are.Or maybe rest of the world should step up and do some of their own earth research too?
Unfortunately we are way past shaming time.Should we make a list of western governments that are trying to fuck the human race by using politics to deny Science and facts for their own monetary greed?
US is already evident in this thread.
Then there's the UK, Headline: Climate change department closed by Theresa May in 'plain stupid' and 'deeply worrying' move
http://www.independent.co.uk/enviro...stupid-and-deeply-worrying-move-a7137166.html
Then there's Australia:
http://theconversation.com/csiro-cuts-as-redundancies-are-announced-the-real-cost-is-revealed-59895
They made 275 Climate scientists redundant but then some time later:
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2016-...everse-job-cut-damages-say-scientists/7691928
They want to renew focus on climate change but they can't reverse the job cuts.
Any others to name and shame?
Alright, so who is out there to push back against Trump's status as a Captain Planet villain? I'm already giving to the ACLU, but apparently ruining every social issue wasn't enough for Trump, so now I have to find a champion for the environmental arena too.
We are still pretty much the leader in science and innovation regardless of who is in power.Can we not just launch the US into space instead? I don't want to be associated with a country that voted for fucking up the planet even more. Or just put a dome over it.
They are.
Unfortunately we are way past shaming time.
We are actually doing both quite well. NASA just launched a weather monitoring satellite operating with NOAA using heavy payload launch systems that are fundamental in also developing systems for human and solar system exploration.
http://yubanet.com/scitech/noaas-goes-r-satellite-heads-to-orbit-will-improve-weather-forecasting/
Why the fuck would you be against this? This isn't even just science for it's sake, it's saving lives.
hope you assholes feel good about your economic situation as your children live shortened lives on a dying planet
how is science political
funniest thing is Trump claiming to have a goal that's 84 years out
this month feels like a nonstop ride through crazytown
every week gets more and more ridiculous
i want off this train
It isn't but scientists can be.how is science political
I think those are under contract, but it depends how far out and how solid those contracts are.Because these idiots think NASA is just 'the space agency', and don't understand what it actually does, or why it does those things. Ted Cruz expressed a similar opinion of 'shouldn't you be exploring space?', failing to comprehend that understanding how our planet does rather help when it comes to potentially settling others, or even just getting off of it consistently and safely.
Though your post does rather raise a bit of particular issue if funding is straight up scrapped, instead of merely scaled back. Specifically, what the hell happens to the collection of satellites NASA has in orbit under the EOS? Its not exactly easy to repurpose or recycle that stuff.