• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

U.S. Senate confirms FCC chairman to new five-year term

Kyrios

Member
giphy.gif
 

Shauni

Member
Basically the beginning of the end of the internet in America as we know it. I knew it was coming, but it still makes me deeply sad. Feel pretty helpless
 

Beartruck

Member
Im not entirely convinced the web will be as chopped up as people fear. Theyll throttle sites for mob style shakeups, but if they start doing shit like carving sites off into seperate plans Google and Amazon will bury them in lawsuits.
 

Shauni

Member
I really hate Republicans and some Democrats, but mostly Republicans in general.

Not a single Democrat voted for the guy as the article states. It is true that Obama originally appointed the guy, which people love to point at since it scratches that 'both sides' itch and all, and Obama deserves criticism for that, but this is on the GOP and Trump. Even if he hadn't been appointed by Obama, Trump and co. would have found someone equally as shitty
 
Not a single Democrat voted for the guy as the article states. It is true that Obama originally appointed the guy, which people love to point at since it scratches that 'both sides' itch and all, and Obama deserves criticism for that, but this is on the GOP and Trump. Even if he hadn't been appointed by Obama, Trump and co. would have found someone equally as shitty

He got in voted in 52-41, at least seven Democrats voted for him, shamefully.
 

Shauni

Member
Im not entirely convinced the web will be as chopped up as people fear. Theyll throttle sites for mob style shakeups, but if they start doing shit like carving sites off into seperate plans Google and Amazon will bury them in lawsuits.

That's just as bad, if not worse.
 
Not a single Democrat voted for the guy as the article states. It is true that Obama originally appointed the guy, which people love to point at since it scratches that 'both sides' itch and all, and Obama deserves criticism for that, but this is on the GOP and Trump. Even if he hadn't been appointed by Obama, Trump and co. would have found someone equally as shitty
My understanding is that there has to be at least one person from the other party on the panel. Mitch McConnell was the one who suggested Ajit Pai for the one Republican on the panel, and Obama agreed to appoint him in a show of bipartisanship.
 
The GOP has exactly 52 senators. Where are you getting 7 Democrats from?

The GOP has 52 seats, so I assume this is party lines. Do we have a list of who voted?

There are 52 Republican senators. Explain to me the math of how a 52-41 vote means seven Democrats voted for him.

The GOP had 52 seats doe...

Whoops, I was just going based off the overall number of senators. Looks like some democratic senators didn't vote (there are 48), instead. That's almost as bad IMO.
 

Shauni

Member
Can't a new president give this guy the boot?

Yeah, but once the damage is done, the question is will a new President and Congress actually reinstate the rules to reinstate net neutrality? Most people seem blissfully unaware of this stuff, and by then the Telecom companies are going to have tons of money invested to keep it deregulated. Only real hope is if it goes to the Supreme Court and they rule in favor of net neutrality, but who can even trust that at this point?
 

Shauni

Member
Whoops, I was just going based off the overall number of senators. Looks like some democratic senators didn't vote (there are 48), instead. That's almost as bad IMO.

Their vote was meaningless, so not really. Probably protest sit-outs of something
 

Blader

Member
Whoops, I was just going based off the overall number of senators. Looks like some democratic senators didn't vote (there are 48), instead. That's almost as bad IMO.

Abstaining from a vote when you're not in the majority is not almost as bad.
 

Beartruck

Member
Honestly, im more worried about the sinclair merger style stuff. Thats waaay harder to reverse than re-instituting some internet regulations, and the sinclair stuff could influence way more voters.
 
Their vote was meaningless, so not really. Probably protest sit-outs of something

Perhaps. I'm assuming Franken was one of those who abstained.

Abstaining from a vote when you're not in the majority is not almost as bad.

I guess it's just that them abstaining gave me a feeling they felt it was hopeless, which is true given that Republicans still have a majority, but still. I guess I really can't hate them for it, it just makes me hate the GOP more, and that's not hard to do.
 

Aselith

Member
Im not entirely convinced the web will be as chopped up as people fear. Theyll throttle sites for mob style shakeups, but if they start doing shit like carving sites off into seperate plans Google and Amazon will bury them in lawsuits.

Lawsuits for what? If its legal, its legal
 

Beartruck

Member
Lawsuits for what? If its legal, its legal
When the FCC enforced net nuetrality Telecoms sued them, and now that its not enforced internet companies will sue them. Do you really think that Amazon, a multi-billion dollar company, is going to let Comcast and AT & T chop them up and fuck with their business model? Or that google will let them not pull up a result on google unless you a pay for the internet+ package?

Basically you'll see open corporate warfare with normal people stuck in the middle. We just need the samurai pizzaman and we'll be in Snow Crash.
 

Zubz

Banned
Fuck. How hard will it be to repair Net Neutrality when things are less shitty again? I know it's a "genie out of the bottle" deal, but we can't be totally boned, right?
 
Top Bottom