Charles Brandon
Member
That's a ridiculous reaction, they are balancing the public interest and you saving a few quid.
I don't think the public interest is being served.
Do Londoners want Uber gone? No.
Do their drivers want Uber gone? No
Cui bono?
That's a ridiculous reaction, they are balancing the public interest and you saving a few quid.
How am I to have a night out without uber?!
Take a taxi? Yeah, it might cost you a bit more, but that's what it takes to run a company where the employees aren't treated like absolute shit.
It's nothing to with their debt
I don't think the public interest is being served.
Do Londoners want Uber gone? No.
Do their drivers want Uber gone? No
Cui bono?
I don't think the public interest is being served.
Do Londoners want Uber gone? No.
Do their drivers want Uber gone? No
Cui bono?
I don't think the public interest is being served.
Do Londoners want Uber gone? No.
Do their drivers want Uber gone? No
Cui bono?
I don't think the public interest is being served.
Do Londoners want Uber gone? No.
Do their drivers want Uber gone? No
Cui bono?
Unless there is a replacement phone app 9 million Londoners know about and can download right Now, they ain't calling any black cabs.
Take a taxi? Yeah, it might cost you a bit more, but that's what it takes to run a company where the employees aren't treated like absolute shit.
Night bus, night tube, black cab? Same way lots of people do it.
Sooooo, basically 40,000 people just got made redundant
Consumer safety is a pretty big public interest. Say, if people are sexually assaulted by Uber drivers, their attitude towards people complaining is shit to say the least.
Would Londoners be happy with Uber existing, but actually with checks and balances, improved safety and regulation? Yes. Uber can fix this and should.
As a Londoner who doesn't drive or ride a bike, I'm glad it's gone. We have pretty great public transport services and so I rarely need to take a taxi.
Do you want to be a taxi driver?
Do you know any taxi drivers?
Why is it that taxi drivers are generally not well educated, and often don't even speak English as their first language? (Hint: It's because it's not a very desirable job. Taxi companies generally do not treat their employees well.)
And this is not to denigrate taxi drivers. It's a fine way to earn a living. But most of them would probably prefer to be doing something else if they could.
How about the people that do need to take a taxi, and for who Uber is more available and convienent?
Uber is clearly no saint here, and need to buck up their ideas and practices - but let's not pretend that there is not an element of anti competitive behaviour by some unions not in play here.
How about the people that do need to take a taxi, and for who Uber is more available and convienent?
Uber is clearly no saint here, and need to buck up their ideas and practices - but let's not pretend that there is not an element of anti competitive behaviour by some unions not in play here.
Do you want to be a taxi driver?
Do you know any taxi drivers?
Why is it that taxi drivers are generally not well educated, and often don't even speak English as their first language? (Hint: It's because it's not a very desirable job. Taxi companies generally do not treat their employees well.)
And this is not to denigrate taxi drivers. It's a fine way to earn a living. But most of them would probably prefer to be doing something else if they could.
That's the point of unions though. All Uber need to do is raise their standards.
Yeah, I can't say I care much either. Even in the middle of the night there's always enough buses (and tubes on some day) to get around the city.As a Londoner who doesn't drive or ride a bike, I'm glad it's gone. We have pretty great public transport services and so I rarely need to take a taxi.
If they had a problem with it, they wouldn't use the service and it would shut down on its own.
It's a service that matches two consenting adults. Someone who wants a ride, and someone who is willing to provide one.
I see everyone in here talking about Uber drivers having a terrible time but from my (very acedotal) experiance they seem to prefer it way more than working for traditional cab companies.
No favouritism, improved efficacy, work whatever hours they feel, no cab-hopping or worries if someone throws up. I always ask my Uber drivers how they feel about Uber and I've only heard positive things.
Absolutely fuck black cabs with there bullshit prices and stupid route taking. You can say what you want about Uber but in terms of safety you had all the details for the driver there in case anything went wrong.
Still waiting for Uber to roll out elsewhere, still got shitty overpriced cabs here in Essex.
This is all self inflicted by Uber though, essentially replying LOL NO to the government when they've asked you to bring your service up to standard is a joke.
We have Uber in Chelmsford.
We have about 2 drivers last time I checked
Way more than that, Ive used it at least a dozen times since July and every driver has been different.
To be honest the only time I take a cab is when I'm hammered and just got off the train at midnight on a week night.
It'd be much harder for a union to lobby against a corp that ticks all the right boxes. In my view it can't really be seen as an anti competitive play when the corp in question isn't adhering to the rules laid out to them.Uber do need to raise their standards - but Unions are there primarily to represent one thing - their own members. If Uber do everything that is required of them, it's highly unlikely that the Unions are suddenly going to forget about them.
Right, I've heard positive things too, and the convenience, information, flexibility, and it'd be great for those things to continue. In principle - an app like it is great, but it's the company that's the issue.
It's what happens when they go wrong that is the question - you have the details, but part of the decision is based on you take that info to Uber, and they wash their hands of it and don't deal with it properly.
I don't think the public interest is being served.
Do Londoners want Uber gone? No.
Do their drivers want Uber gone? No
Cui bono?
Of course I don't want to be a taxi driver. But I think it's probably better than how Uber contractors are treated? Maybe not all drivers think so, but if you look at the larger picture.
How am I to have a night out without uber?!
By using the modes of transport that were available before Uber came maybe?
I genuinely do not know the answer to this, but isn't Uber meant to provide a much safer service? Can someone explain to me why Black Cabs aren't held to Uber's standard?
Such as?
Sketchy af buses filled with night walking chavs?
This is fucking ridiculous.
Uber is a godsend for late night trips home.
Taxi fairs are simply far too expensive.
They won't just go to minicabs or black cabs, they'll take the tube/bus instead.