Masquerader
Member
This is really depressing (Opinion piece which tells the story and is entirely relevant anyway).
While it isn't necessarily the responsibility of the UK, the reasoning is ridiculously cold-hearted.
Telegraph said:Finally. After years of debate and vacillation and inaction, the nations of Europe have at last come up with a solution to the refugee crisis that is blighting our continent.
Every year, hundreds of thousands of men, women and children seeking sanctuary from the chaos and carnage of places like Syria and Libya wash up in their ramshackle craft on the Mediterranean coastline. The countries that constitute their destination Italy, Greece, Spain have found themselves on the front line a mini-humanitarian crisis.
But our politicians have now found the answer. And its a bold one. Were going to take those refugees, and were going to drown them.
Today the Guardian reports that Britain along with its EU partners is backing the withdrawal of search and rescue support from the Mediterranean. According to a statement from Foreign Office minister Lady Anelay: "We do not support planned search and rescue operations in the Mediterranean". She added that the government believes there is an unintended pull factor, encouraging more migrants to attempt the dangerous sea crossing and thereby leading to more tragic and unnecessary deaths.
The announcement was made as the Italian government confirmed that it would be ending operation Mare Nostrum, its own dedicated search and rescue effort, which it says has become unsustainable. Over the last 12 months Mare Nostrum is estimated to have assisted in the rescue of 150,000 refugees. Despite their efforts, thousands of other refugees have perished since the turn of the year.
Lets spend a moment interrogating the governments position on this issue. And this is the British Governments position, remember. This is our Governments position.
Our Governments argument is and this is literally the logic of Lady Anelays statement We understand that by withdrawing this rescue cover we will be leaving innocent children, women and men to drown who we would otherwise have saved. But eventually word will get around the war-torn communities of Syria and Libya and the other unstable nations of the region that we are indeed leaving innocent children, women and men to drown. And when it does, they will think twice about making the journey. And so eventually, over time, more lives will be saved.
As I say, there is some logic to that statement. In the same way that, I suppose, there would be some logic in claiming that if the Government announced that it was abolishing the fire service we may all become a bit more careful when were using our chip pans. Or that if manufacturers removed seat belts and airbags from our cars some of us may drive a bit more slowly.
But if you step back, youll soon see the flaws in the Governments lets drown some refugees to save some refugees policy. There may well be a pull factor motivating some of these refugees. But I would guess there is also possibly a push factor at play here as well.
Im not sure about you, but if I were planning to load my children, my parents and my grandparents onto some rickety raft with a view to sailing it 1,500 miles across the shark-infested waters of the Mediterranean, Id have to have a pretty good reason. And it would have to be better than a forlorn hope a random Italian coastguard cutter might spot me and haul me aboard.
Isil would be a good reason. Those murdering, raping, torturing, butchering, psychos who are currently running amok across the Middle East. Id get on a boat to get away from them, regardless of who I thought might or might be waiting to pick me up. And over the coming months as the bodies of the Drown A Refugee To Save A Refugee program continue to wash up on the coastal resorts of Europe well have ample evidence that plenty of other people will take any risk to escape them as well.
But lets set aside this warped apology for logic. The sickening, disgusting, inhumane attempt of our government to insert some sort of moral hazard into the refugee train.
These people are seeking sanctuary. They are refugees. Genuine refugees. Yes, there will be some economic migrants among their number. But these people are running from places where you would need to have your head examined if you didnt have a well-founded fear of persecution.
And we have a golden rule. It is inviolate. If you are a genuine refugee, and you come to us seeking sanctuary, you will be granted it. No ifs. No buts. In Britain. In Europe. Wherever you are in the world.
A couple of years ago the former BNP leader Nick Griffin infamously said he would solve the Mediterranean refugee problem by sinking their boats. The British government has now adopted the same policy. Its simply decided to save on the ammunition.
This is what happens. This is where the death spiral into a political bidding war on immigration leads us. To a position where in 2014 the British Government our Government is saying that we should stand aside and watch asylum seekers drown.
Bring us your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free. So we can sit back and watch as they vanish for a final time beneath the cold dark waters of the Mediterranean.
While it isn't necessarily the responsibility of the UK, the reasoning is ridiculously cold-hearted.