BruceLeeRoy
Banned
Gotta shill for Ubi ;P
Ha well the AC series is still ass but RB6:Siege and now the Division is starting to renew my faith in good ole UBI.
Gotta shill for Ubi ;P
Übermatik;196501247 said:I had to do it...
![]()
Heh.
I have a brother. I can say he is handsome for different girl. Me the exact opposite. So.I still don't get why they made Nathan Drake's brother so ugly.
Having magazine cover model run around with hobo looking guy is so bizarre, they don't even look related.
Why would you want that? He's old and fat now.![]()
Maybe people are learning very slowly to not jump to conclusions (some of us that is) They could well have asked for permission to use the art. The only thing i'm impressed by but also at the same time find a little sad is people spotting this one piece of art so quickly that is from some ACIV art book..Uhh, if it was literally ANYOTHER developer, GAF would have their pitchforks and torches out. Not sure how this stuff works, but if they got the ok for it, then that's cool, still weird. But if it's in the final game then I smell a lawsuit and somebody is getting canned.
lmao
Nobody gives the smallest shit about it, why should anyone?
it's just a picture
![]()
I would sincerely consider giving ROTR or QB's previews a watch, especially considering that they started out with keyframing, and are using a more traditional performance capture setup compared to CD or Remedy who're both using incredibly high quality capture methods, CD especially, they used MOVA. In-game character animation is ND's specialty, not specifically facial.
There are so many nuances in that webm that it kinda disapproved your point. ._.
Ahahahahaha
Chromatic aberration. Its a defect caused by shitty camera lenses on pictures taht for some reason game developers are copying. This is an example I always give. Life Is Strange. You cannot turn it off in game settings, but you can force it off with a config file, and the game just looks so much better
One of the more extreme examples, the other would be bloodborne. A lot of games try to use a little CA because it gives an illusion of anti aliasing, but in reality is just blurs and distorts the image and looks like shit
Maybe people are learning very slowly to not jump to conclusions (some of us that is) They could well have asked for permission to use the art. The only thing i'm impressed by but also at the same time find a little sad is people spotting this one piece of art so quickly that is from some ACIV art book..
though the game looks amazing overall, the only reasonable amount of CA is 0
Why are we automatically assuming it isn't? Until we know more, it really isn't a big deal.How hilariously foolish. This is straight up STEALING somebody else's work if its not licensed. But hey they make amazing games so who gives a shit right?
How hilariously foolish. This is straight up STEALING somebody else's work if its not licensed. But hey they make amazing games so who gives a shit right?
How hilariously foolish. This is straight up STEALING somebody else's work if its not licensed. But hey they make amazing games so who gives a shit right?
Originally Posted by 5amshift
Uhh, if it was literally ANYOTHER developer, GAF would have their pitchforks and torches out. Not sure how this stuff works, but if they got the ok for it, then that's cool, still weird. But if it's in the final game then I smell a lawsuit and somebody is getting canned.
Maybe people are learning very slowly to not jump to conclusions (some of us that is) They could well have asked for permission to use the art. The only thing i'm impressed by but also at the same time find a little sad is people spotting this one piece of art so quickly that is from some ACIV art book..
There are so many nuances in that webm that it kinda disapproved your point. ._.
I'm done.
Plenty of people care. Don't confuse two posters with the entire thread.
Ruh-oh.
Someone's getting fired.
From Beyond3d
![]()
cant believe naughty dog would steal an image like that. their standards should be higher
whats the worst that could happen as a result?
cant believe naughty dog would steal an image like that. their standards should be higher
whats the worst that could happen as a result?