AgentOtaku
Member
I honestly forgot everything I just watched. The narration was great. But if there was gameplay story spoilers beyond that mountain gif and Nate swimming, I don't remember them.
okay then
I honestly forgot everything I just watched. The narration was great. But if there was gameplay story spoilers beyond that mountain gif and Nate swimming, I don't remember them.
cant believe naughty dog would steal an image like that. their standards should be higher
whats the worst that could happen as a result?
Maybe people are learning very slowly to not jump to conclusions (some of us that is) They could well have asked for permission to use the art.
I doubt it, because this was pointed out by a Ubi Soft (AC) guy ...
I always said Nate chose wrong.
but also at the same time find a little sad is people spotting this one piece of art so quickly that is from some ACIV art book..
They edit out that scene to have a different picture on the wall before it goes gold? Or has it gone gold already?cant believe naughty dog would steal an image like that. their standards should be higher
whats the worst that could happen as a result?
cant believe naughty dog would steal an image like that. their standards should be higher
whats the worst that could happen as a result?
Hahahahahaha, oh my god. This is amazing.
game cancelled probably
I was mocking them for claiming nobody cares or should care.
I always said Nate chose wrong.
The image with CA looks better to me. At least the effect hides lots of the flaws of the graphics.Chromatic aberration. Its a defect caused by shitty camera lenses on pictures taht for some reason game developers are copying. This is an example I always give. Life Is Strange. You cannot turn it off in game settings, but you can force it off with a config file, and the game just looks so much better
One of the more extreme examples, the other would be bloodborne. A lot of games try to use a little CA because it gives an illusion of anti aliasing, but in reality is just blurs and distorts the image and looks like shit
cant believe naughty dog would steal an image like that. their standards should be higher
whats the worst that could happen as a result?
I'd bet on this being the result of a outsourced art team in charge of creating that room using the picture and passing it off to ND as their work. There's a lot of outsourcing for environment art like this in modern development.How hilariously foolish. This is straight up STEALING somebody else's work if its not licensed. But hey they make amazing games so who gives a shit right?
What am I missing?
Mine was more of a response to your initial post of "you people."
Apologies if I misunderstood.
The picture Nate is looking at is straight from an Assassin's Creed artbook. The guy tweeting is Assassin's Creed head of content.What am I missing?
Come on!. Several UBI devs have started working for ND. It could even be the image creator one of them. It could perfectly be a tribute.
Yooooo
I always said Nate chose wrong.
Nope. Martin (the creator of the artwork) sits right here.
Regarding Ubisoft's comment on female animations back in the day:
![]()
![]()
Now:
![]()
Savage.
If not licensed its an automatic win for the artist in court. Ultimately they'll be forced to replace the assert, but the real damage would be their integrity.
Yeah the 2 I quoted. Its ridiculous to just glaze over this when its clear they made some very minor changes and tossed it on their as if they couldn't be bothered to Mae their own.
Once again hopefully its licensed although I don't see why you would pay for the asset when you could easily put your own.
Official Assassin's Creed twitter account retweeted this.
Nope. Martin (the creator of the artwork) sits right here.
Regarding Ubisoft's comment on female animations back in the day:
![]()
![]()
Now:
![]()
Savage.
Nope. Martin (the creator of the artwork) sits right here.
Regarding Ubisoft's comment on female animations back in the day:
![]()
![]()
Now:
![]()
Savage.
Again what is wrong with the people defending this? Don't bring up past garbage. Ubisofts statement was stupid... ND I'd stupid to steal and that's the topic at hand. Stop trying to defer.
Or, since the game isn't released or finalized, they just change the asset now while its still in development. This is why its such a non-issue. If an artist slipped up & googled 'island concept art', pulled it without looking where it came from and put it in there, and now its turning out that piece is from a highly licensed product, its no sweat off their backs to just change the asset to some other generic island concept art.
You're making this a far more significant issue than it actually is. If the game was out right now, and available for commercial sale, and this asset was in there, then yes, this would be an issue. But its not, its a product that is still in active development, and is still subject to change.
I always said Nate chose wrong.
Which ones specifically if you don't mind me asking? Besides the ones I named.I own Rise of the Tomb Raider and have pre-ordered QB. They both look fantastic and I don't plan to take anything away from them, despite my view of Uncharted 4's elements being superior.
Those nuances are also directly from the actress. That scene isn't the only one in the game but i'd rather not flood the thread with TR gifs,All those "nuances" happen individually, one after the other, as if the game's imploring for you to look at them. Lara looks like a robot as a result.