i love people defending overbooking.
"its not going away anytime soon so we should get used to it".
Yes, when a company is shitty, the best thing anyone can do is just get used to it
BUT THE CORPORATIONS, WONT SOMEONE THINK OF THEIR BOTTOM LINE!?
In the wake of this and the debates being brought to the surface about what airlines can do with overbooked flights, in general, we can try and pressure for it to be made illegal.
To understand why it happens you go down the rabbit hole of understanding airline ticket prices and the race to the bottom of passengers wanting the cheapest prices possible to travel across the country. Airlines claim to do it to make up for loss in people not travelling or cancelling at the last minute, empty seats, and say that outweighs the costs they have to spend in the likes of the figures above of 132k passengers bumped in a calendar year. That is to say more money would be lost from empty seats versus the amount of money that has to be given out in compensation. So the airlines say overbooking is the lesser of the two evils if passengers main concerns are
rock bottom prices to travel. Everyone claims to say they'll pay more for quality, but the bigger core of any service industry tends to be price sensitive, not always quality sensitive (although people do demand great quality even at the cheapest prices). In todays world of "comparemyticketprices.com" sites, the majority are always sorting by lowest price.
Having these debates isn't inherently
defending it but trying to get to the bottom of why it happens, if it can be stopped and what the consequences are for stopping it. One opinion may be for the money it can save on ticket prices maybe the short-term step is demanding airlines don't assault passengers before going right to we need to abolish overbooking asap? Considering how long overbooking has been going on with relatively few PR issues/0 people being assaulted, is that really the main issue here, or is the real issue that UA brought on police to drag someone violently off a plane?
Many including me have said multiple times, the guy said he was a doctor and was very clear in saying he wasn't leaving, leave him alone and move onto someone else. Considering involuntary bumping is cash in hand, I'm sure another passenger selected randomly would have given in just like the 3 prior to this man did. Then there would have been no assault and no PR nightmare. That simple. How the cabin crew and manager couldn't accept that and went right to calling on security is mind-numbing. Even if involuntary is suppose to mean strictly involuntary, management needs to be able to use it's head to look at SOME cases in a case-by-case basis. Not always tow a rigid company policy line. This is the perfect example of what happens in a company when there is 0 autonomy at ALL times. You actually could use this in business schools as a prime example of what happens when management does not think on the spot, and instead answers to chain of command like they are literally IN chains.
They can't do that. How would you feel if you were the "next" person selected, and they only came to you because the guy before you resisted? You would feel that why should he get to stay and I have to go? That would have honestly been worse PR than what they got.
The amount of inconvenience this airline was willing to put it's passengers through in this circumstance should have made them realize they need to open their wallets to get some cooperation. When they stood firm at $800 they screwed themselves over. I'm not saying they need to go into the thousands all the time, but this time it was necessary, because the next flight wasn't until the following afternoon and they are bumping people due to their own logistical incompetence, not due to overbooking.
You don't get cash in hand for voluntary bumping. You literally HAVE to hold out for involuntary to get cash. Therefore logic would dictate there would literally be someone else on that plane who would jump at the ability to get 1k in their bank account to travel 24 hours later. They cannot get it from volunteering, though. Or even if it's not "jump at it", certainly agree in a disgruntled manner, but agree nonetheless. Hence as I just said above UA cabin crew and management acting like there was NO other option than to force this man led to this mess.
3 people got off the plane for the cash who originally did not volunteer. That tells you people may well "agree" once the offer of compensation is far more attractive than flying vouchers and a hotel. Although, maybe it was best for their own sakes they agreed as not to get dragged off the flight...