Hari Seldon
Member
I believe the improper scanning thing. They used to print those boarding passes on good card stock but now that shit is on tissue paper.
Holy crap, how tiny is this woman or how massive is this kid.
Because now they know the government is unabashedly pro-big business, and there likely will be minimal, if any, actual repercussions.How can literally every single air service have daily news coming out about how shit they treat their customers?
2017.Toddler's lucky he made it off the plane in one piece, given United's reputation.
United stock is at an all-time high despite all the negative press. Why should they give a fuck?
Shit I'd hold my kid for 3 hours if it saved me $1000.
Now, if she didn't get that money back that's another issue.
Try this stunt with an adult passenger next time, I'd like to see what happens.
27 month old? .....gtfo kid is 2 years old. Say the 2 year old.....fucks sake
Holy crap, how tiny is this woman or how massive is this kid.
So United announces a new policy of offering up to $10000 for overbooked flights.. They get around it by lying and saying the ticket was improperly scanned.
No, only kids under 2.Aren't you not supposed to hold the toddler on the flight and are required to have the extra seat or am I not remembering the pre flight videos correctly?
Holy crap, how tiny is this woman or how massive is this kid.
They expected you to give up your purchased seat for free?Interesting, Southwest tried to do this to me just last week, but it was a southwest employee not a standby passenger. I offered to sell it back to them since my daughter was going to insist on sleeping in my lap the entire flight anyway, they didn't bite.
I was on a Delta flight with my family. Apparently they forgot to scan my 3 year olds ticket or it didn't scan right. So the attendants came by, asked if she was on and said, "Okay. Thanks."
I would be so furious if this happened to me.
You'd think US airlines were unregulated reading all the latest news about horrible customer service. If the airlines knew they couldn't step on the rules to sell more seats without suffering hefty fines or worse, they'd have the incentive they need to stop. Is that not the case?
I'm honestly amazed they aren't already bleeding badly from this stuff.Why does bad news continue to pour out of United flights? They seriously need to retrain all staff and halt these bad practices before it starts costing them big.
I'm honestly amazed they aren't already bleeding badly from this stuff.
There's been a string of shitty news about United recently and they just keep coming.
Yeah I thought point 3 is against FAA regulations. Not only should she get a refund+compensation, the FAA should be fining United. But if not, I see it is clearly United policy to require children over two to have their own seat and ticket. So still violating their own policy.1) the excuse is bullshit because they would check on a kid traveling with an adult and not just sell the ticket.
2) the standby guy can just get fucked and go back on standby
3) holding a kid over 2 isn't safe. She doesn't deserve a ticket refund, she deserves a shitload more
Competition among service providers is supposed to be what pushes change, better customer care etc. If you have a bad experience with one try a competitor. Unfortunately when they're all shit (or there is no choice) this doesn't work.Flight is a commodity, like cable and internet. What, are people going to walk from Hawaii to Boston? There is very little incentive to improve, particularly service for rare flights.
Kids are getting bigger at a younger age these days, its all the fluoride in the water.Holy crap, how tiny is this woman or how massive is this kid.
A United spokesman told The Washington Post that Taizo's boarding pass had been improperly scanned and that because the toddler wasn't logged in to the system, his seat was released to a standby passenger.
I can't believe airlines are allowed to be so shitty.
Depends on the age. For young kids, you can have them as a "lap infant", while older kids require a seat. I'm fairly certain, though, that lap infant ends at 2, so this kid's too old for that anyway.
Also, I can buy they screwed up the scanning of the ticket, but how that possibly means that they can forces the mom to give up a seat is nuts. When it happened, they should just have said "oh crap, seat's taken", and walked the standby guy back off the plane.
1) as a parent i would have probably gotten thrown off the plane if that was my kid.
2) if i was the standby passenger i would not have taken the seat and insisted the child take it.
Yamauchi, 42, told the station she didn't want to cause a scene, remembering recent United incidents such as the Kentucky doctor, David Dao, who was violently dragged off his flight in April.
"I'm scared. I'm worried. I'm traveling with an infant. I didn't want to get hurt. I didn't want either of us to get hurt," she said.
Ummmm... paying someone what they are fucking owed is not a good will gesture. It's fixing your fuckup.
Yeah. 200% refund would be a goodwill gesture.
Give her the $1000 back, United.
Did she get her money back?
The companies make so much money. Goddamn. Just give her a refund. Apologize and say she'll be fully refunded and even get some bonus miles and the story goes away before it even becomes one.
United continues to be shit. Improperly scanned? They have fucking numbers that can be manually entered in if the barcode can't be scanned
Why would they let someone on the plane if their ticket didn't scan properly?
Bunch of bastards. You'd think after their bad PR a few months ago they'd be making sure they're treating passengers better to ensure shit like this doesn't happen.
"No other flight attendants asked Yamauchi about the seating arrangement for the remainder of the flight, despite the fact that it violated Uniteds own traveling with children policy. The FAA also strongly advises against allowing children to sit on an adults lap during flights because arms arent capable of holding your child securely, especially during unexpected turbulence.
So many issues with this story. It's illegal for anyone over 2 to sit on a parents lap so they shouldn't have even kept them on the plane. It's also strange how they didn't just make the standby person get off the plane, it's not like they were in the air already. The story's account of how the flight attendant just shrugged and said "flights full" is either a huge embellishment or that flight attendant is a sociopath.
The standard of service needs to be higher for airlines though. And policies need to be in place that are viewed universally as fair. If they had told the standby passenger that they made a mistake and that the flight was already sold out, he would have been pissed off, but that's the risk when you're on standby... you weren't even guaranteed a spot on the plane. The lady paid for her son's ticket, and was guaranteed a spot for him, until United made the wrong decision and took it away.
Its like they make their decisions based on the view of "common sense" by the employee handling it rather than strict written policies that are agreed on by all. Way too much of that horseshit going on, which is what sparks all of the outrage. If that seat wasn't taken by a 2 year old, the standby passenger would have got the boot.
United refunded the mom the cost of both tickets, plus additional compensation before this thread was even posted. OP used the one story that doesn't include that information.