MMaRsu
Member
He was innocent.He isn't innocent. He was pretty much a murderer himself with how his company acts.
Just because healthcare in your country is so terrible, doesnt make someone who kills a ceo a fucking HERO.
Get fucking real man.
He was innocent.He isn't innocent. He was pretty much a murderer himself with how his company acts.
This would make a great anime.
"I Assassinated a CEO but a Girl Smiled at Me So I Showed My Face to a Camera and Now We Are Running Away Together"
He was a CEO of a company with one of his priorities being maximising shareholder return, which in turn meant increasing the % of rejected claims. It has already been reported UHC had the highest rate of rejections in the US.He was innocent.
He was a CEO of a company with one of his priorities being maximising shareholder return, which in turn meant increasing the % of rejected claims. It has already been reported UHC had the highest rate of rejections in the US.
CEO of a company with one of his priorities being maximising shareholder return
No, he didn't deserve to die, but that part of the conversation should be included as well, whereas all we hear is how incredible human bien the was, husband, father, etc. You can have the good with the bad, people are adults.Right so he deserves to die, and not even a natural death, nah just a straight up execution in the streets.
Make it make sense.
No, he didn't deserve to die, but that part of the conversation should be included as well, whereas all we hear is how incredible human bien the was, husband, father, etc. You can have the good with the bad, people are adults.
you do get that the all of the glee stems from the fact that the guy was a CEO of a healthcare company that has a less than caring attitude to those it is supposed to support, right?Gee, so like every other CEO ever?
you do get that the all of the glee stems from the fact that the guy was a CEO of a healthcare company that has a less than caring attitude to those it is supposed to support, right?
i don't think most people would be talking like this if it was the CEO of a middling supermarket chain
I'm not American 'man', my healthcare system is pretty good. The guy is (or was) responsible for a company that apparently caused the death of a bunch of people. He was a murderer or at least an accessory to murder. Yes I think proven murderers should be executed, but maybe not in the street.He was innocent.
Just because healthcare in your country is so terrible, doesnt make someone who kills a ceo a fucking HERO.
Get fucking real man.
I'm not American 'man', my healthcare system is pretty good. The guy is (or was) responsible for a company that apparently caused the death of a bunch of people. He was a murderer or at least an accessory to murder. Yes I think proven murderers should be executed, but maybe not in the street.
This guy didn't give a shit about other peoples lives but we are supposed to care about his? Give me a break.
Might as well murder every ceo of every insurance company then, because in the end they don't care about the people, they care about running a succesful business.
Yeah he deserved to die for that.
Ah now he's not running a company now he's a scammer.Sure they don't care like a lot of people. But these assholes actually take peoples money ,with the promise to maybe save their life someday with the healthcare these people paid for, and then refuse it to them. So it's not just not caring for peoples live, it's actually scamming them too and letting them die.
When two cold-blooded killers meet, people cheer for the lesser devil. Humanity has always been like this. Thanks to behavior like this, we're far less savage than we were 100 years ago.
My good Christian sense says the guy is guilty as hell, he deserves at least life in prison. His murderer deserves at least... 10 years, if he vows to correct his ways.
Hm, yes. He doesn't seem the type to kill again after sentencing. Especially now that he's dead.There's a joke to be made about how many years he'd get if he refused to correct his ways, but I think some might be appalled.
Ah now he's not running a company now he's a scammer.
Cmon man stop rationalizing murder!
I'm sure you, myself and most of GAF happily buy products from companies that use supply chains that exploit a shit ton of people, including children in Africa not in school and working in dangerous unregulated gang run mines (look into Cobalt), or slave labour in Xinjiang province in China etc...What?
He was actually a guy running a company that made money out of scamming people out of their rightful insurrance. Actually scamming many people out of their lifes. So yes he was a scammer AND a guy running a company AND a murderer/accomplice to murder.
Hm, yes. He doesn't seem the type to kill again after sentencing. Especially now that he's dead.
Not the way the health insurance companies see it, as they have entire departments dedicated to the sole purpose of scamming people out of the coverage that they’ve spent an entire lifetime buying into. Just because it’s legal doesn’t make it not murder. It’s just institutionalized murder.A human life is a human life.
I mean we have t-shirts on Amazon celebrating murderers.Interesting how shooting someone dead in the streets like a dog is somehow okay if the person works at a bad company. I'm amazed how easy people step over the threshold of morality that you can't just go around killing anyone you don't like in our society.
What?
He was actually a guy running a company that made money out of scamming people out of their rightful insurrance. Actually scamming many people out of their lifes. So yes he was a scammer AND a guy running a company AND a murderer/accomplice to murder.
Quality of care is rubbish and unexpected disease will bankrupt you. C'mon man, just do some homework. I did 5-month chemo + radiotherapy of absolutely no fault of mine (my cancer was not linked at all to my lifestyle), I paid exactly ZERO for a series of treatments. US healthcare is social darwinism (where the fittest have money) in practice.
Basically this.
So if I get this right for 500k bill you will first pay $1200 from your pocket then you will pay $49 880 (500 000 - 1200, take 10%) in addition?
You know how much I will pay for treatment that costs this much? 0€.
He was innocent.
Innocent of what?
When you run the company that has cost people their lives, that's not being innocent.
It would take a pretty big entity with lots of proof to do anything legally. I can see why there are people out there like "welp, have to go back to the old ways to remove evil people from the world".
His company was shit but I wish the people would wake up to who is really ripping them off and that's central bankers. Focus your energy on ending debt as currency, ending central banks, and forcing your governments to be fiscally responsible rather than spending your great grand children's money today.He was a CEO of a company with one of his priorities being maximising shareholder return, which in turn meant increasing the % of rejected claims. It has already been reported UHC had the highest rate of rejections in the US.
Yeah so its on 'the people' to start killing these folks off, then we'll have a better world!
Holy shit how many idiots are going to rationalize executing a man in the streets
Innocent of what?
When you run the company that has cost people their lives, that's not being innocent.
It would take a pretty big entity with lots of proof to do anything legally. I can see why there are people out there like "welp, have to go back to the old ways to remove evil people from the world".
Ok, so it's first $5000 in fees per year you pay out of your pocket, correct? Is the deductible the monthly fee for this coverage? So that's $14.4k per year?No, there's a max I pay in a year, $5000. You pay no taxes to cover your health coverage?
The idea here is that we (americans) have more money in our pocket to save, so if you don't have a lot of medical bills that year then you have money to save or spend on home improvements, hookers and blow, or whatever. For you socialized types, you lose that $$$ EVERY YEAR NO MATTER WHAT, so if you are healthy that year you still pay the same as if you were sick.Ok, so it's first $5000 in fees per year you pay out of your pocket, correct? Is the deductible the monthly fee for this coverage? So that's $14.4k per year?
Yes, of course I pay taxes for health coverage.
If you had a family member who was a crackhead, would you support his death because he's a net-negative for society? Do we deploy firing squads to eliminate anyone you believe is not morally innocent? Are you the judge of such assessment?
Except with insurance premiums most of us end up paying more than we would if taxed and also get hit up when we actually get sick.The idea here is that we (americans) have more money in our pocket to save, so if you don't have a lot of medical bills that year then you have money to save or spend on home improvements, hookers and blow, or whatever. For you socialized types, you lose that $$$ EVERY YEAR NO MATTER WHAT, so if you are healthy that year you still pay the same as if you were sick.
Obviously your mindset will determine which one is more acceptable to you, but that's the general 'idea' behind our system, formulated in a very different time in our economy.
That's a shit analogy, a crackhead who likely has major problems in their lives to get there, their not letting down what is likely thousands, tens of or more people and making them suffer.
They're not part of a bigger problem like this.
Also, you likely missed that I'm not rationalising it in my second post, I wouldn't do that and I wouldn't want anyone to do that.
But I can understand and explain a reason why someone would.
Thats an assumption. Might be an accurate one for certain tax brackets. Certainly the idea that, if solely tax payer funded, then all the young, working, uninsured would then be 'contributing to the pool' is an attractive one. But I question how well a single entity can really cover hundreds of millions and thousands of miles of territory. The VA isn't quite a 1:1 comparison since it also runs the hospitals, but there are few vets that really preach about how great the experience dealing with the VA is.Except with insurance premiums most of us end up paying more than we would if taxed and also get hit up when we actually get sick.
The problem we have in the US is that the Healthcare system is almost completely cut-off from market pressure. Doctors charge higher and higher rates - the insurance companies push back, but only so far because as Healthcare costs go up, they are skimming off the top of a bigger pie, and their service becomes more and more valuable. Most of us at the bottom - the actual consumers - have little choice in our insurance provider - that is our employers choice. The impact of shitty service is much lower than the impact of cost - so the company that can offer the lowest charge to the company for the same on paper coverage wins out, then they can claw out profit by being obtuse when it comes to claims. We do have (some) choice of doctor but we don't really know up front how much anything is going to cost - and because we have insurance, cost is not a primary concern.Thats an assumption. Might be an accurate one for certain tax brackets. Certainly the idea that, if solely tax payer funded, then all the young, working, uninsured would then be 'contributing to the pool' is an attractive one. But I question how well a single entity can really cover hundreds of millions and thousands of miles of territory. The VA isn't quite a 1:1 comparison since it also runs the hospitals, but there are few vets that really preach about how great the experience dealing with the VA is.
The other issue is if the gov is the primary health care funder, then it will HAMMER anything deemed a health care risk. Like motorcycles. Smoking. Drinking. Drug use. On and on, the bean counters will see the true costs and there may be some really surprising outcomes that folks may not like.
The only shit here is your childish teen angst mentality that tries to rationalize the death of a person based on some imaginary threshold of inflicted pain you created two days ago.
I think the term these days is “systemic”.Not the way the health insurance companies see it, as they have entire departments dedicated to the sole purpose of scamming people out of the coverage that they’ve spent an entire lifetime buying into. Just because it’s legal doesn’t make it not murder. It’s just [institutionalized murder.
You understand the difference between personally rationalising a belief, and rationalising why someone might do something right?
You know one isn't the opinion of the writer, yes?
When you run the company that has cost people their lives, that's not being innocent.
The biggest killer in the U.S is not cancer, not smoking, it's cholesterol aka heart problems from fatty and sugary foods. So the following companies CEOs would be on a hit list:If this murder was justified, CEOs of companies in the following branches are on a hit list:
Pharma,
Oil,
Weapon,
Tobacco,
Alcoholic beverages,
Mining,
Etc etc. The list goes on.
If this murder was justified, CEOs of companies in the following branches are on a hit list:
Pharma,
Yes, but I would say this idea is much closer to INSURANCE than the American one. After all if you have e.g. car insurance and you don't wreck it in a given year you are not complaining your money is wasted, right?For you socialized types, you lose that $$$ EVERY YEAR NO MATTER WHAT, so if you are healthy that year you still pay the same as if you were sick.
I guess it depends on your "base" payment. If I spend $2k/yr on auto premiums out of pocket or 2k/yr on an "auto coverage tax" then it's kinda moot, but at least the way the progressive tax system in the US works is about 50% of the country would be paying very little "auto tax", and the rest would be paying 2 to 20k a year, making out of pocket more appealing to the more wealthy. Of course the wealthy drive more expensive cars as well, with a higher premium, so it's hard to see where the cost savings come from for a tax based auto plan. Uninsured coverage is already a thing, plus folks without a car would balk at paying the tax as well. Plus you lose your driving privilege, and can even go to jail, for being uninsured. Hard to translate that to health careYes, but I would say this idea is much closer to INSURANCE than the American one. After all if you have e.g. car insurance and you don't wreck it in a given year you are not complaining your money is wasted, right?
I don’t disagree that Unitedhealthcare seems to be an egregiously terrible company that contributed to suffering on a wide scale, largely avoidably so, after having done some research.
If we abandon rule of law, though, we lose civilization. I would prefer sweeping health care reform over murder in the streets. Especially when a mob of emotionally volatile people can be convinced of virtually anything trivially, e.g., someone being an irredeemable piece of shit who deserves to die, regardless of the truth.
This time maybe you can consider it justifiable, but what about next time? Everyone with sufficient money and power will remain siloed from the rest of society, chaperoned by bodyguards, even more so than they already are. Let’s not turn ourselves into a failed state.