• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

US nearly detonated atomic bomb over North Carolina – secret document

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ether_Snake

安安安安安安安安安安安安安安安
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/20/usaf-atomic-bomb-north-carolina-1961

A secret document, published in declassified form for the first time by the Guardian today, reveals that the US Air Force came dramatically close to detonating an atom bomb over North Carolina that would have been 260 times more powerful than the device that devastated Hiroshima.

The document, obtained by the investigative journalist Eric Schlosser under the Freedom of Information Act, gives the first conclusive evidence that the US was narrowly spared a disaster of monumental proportions when two Mark 39 hydrogen bombs were accidentally dropped over Goldsboro, North Carolina on 23 January 1961. The bombs fell to earth after a B-52 bomber broke up in mid-air, and one of the devices behaved precisely as a nuclear weapon was designed to behave in warfare: its parachute opened, its trigger mechanisms engaged, and only one low-voltage switch prevented untold carnage.

Each bomb carried a payload of 4 megatons – the equivalent of 4 million tons of TNT explosive. Had the device detonated, lethal fallout could have been deposited over Washington, Baltimore, Philadelphia and as far north as New York city – putting millions of lives at risk.

Supposedly one of the two bombs that dropped remains unrecovered:eek:
 

Mike M

Nick N
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/20/usaf-atomic-bomb-north-carolina-1961



Supposedly one of the two bombs that dropped remains unrecovered:eek:

Broken-Arrow-poster.jpg
 
Isn't it INCREDIBLY hard to successfully ignite the payload?

If the warhead goes off, it'll spread radioactive contaminant all over the place and that wouldn't be so great, but it's nowhere near the magnitude of damage if the bomb properly detonated and you get Hiroshima-esque results.

...right, physics-GAF?
 
Isn't it INCREDIBLY hard to successfully ignite the payload?

If the warhead goes off, it'll spread radioactive contaminant all over the place and that wouldn't be so great, but it's nowhere near the magnitude of damage if the bomb properly detonated and you get Hiroshima-esque results.

...right, physics-GAF?

260 times Hiroshima-esque results!
 
They would have blamed the Soviet Union

And let them "get away with it"? Or you think they'd rather destroy the world (themselves included) than fess up to an accident?

How the fuck do you not know where you dropped that shit.

Because the aircraft is moving quickly, and its exact position at the time of the release is unknown. We're talking 1960's, where even if you have a specific target in mind the best you're hoping for is to drop a bomb within a kilometer of it.
 

pompidu

Member
Isn't it INCREDIBLY hard to successfully ignite the payload?

If the warhead goes off, it'll spread radioactive contaminant all over the place and that wouldn't be so great, but it's nowhere near the magnitude of damage if the bomb properly detonated and you get Hiroshima-esque results.

...right, physics-GAF?

I imagine the fall knocked a lot of the material loose. The detonation within has to be precise. The initial bullet explosion probably be as big as it would get. It wouldn't trigger the nuclear material within.
 

NeonZ

Member
Isn't it INCREDIBLY hard to successfully ignite the payload?

If the warhead goes off, it'll spread radioactive contaminant all over the place and that wouldn't be so great, but it's nowhere near the magnitude of damage if the bomb properly detonated and you get Hiroshima-esque results.

...right, physics-GAF?

The article makes it sound like the bomb was behaving like it had been properly launched though, at least partially.
 
Isn't it true scientists working on the Manhattan Project weren't entirely sure what would happen when they detonated an atomic bomb? That sounds pretty scary. I guess if it blew up the space time continuum they wouldn't have much time for regrets.
 
D

Deleted member 13876

Unconfirmed Member
There is an old discovery channel doucmentry about this. Back when Discovery channel was about such things.

Hey man, I'm looking forward to their upcoming Ghost Bombs From The Phantom Dimension documentary.
 

cdyhybrid

Member
I find it hard to believe they don't know where it is. They must have surveillance on every square inch of the country.
 

pompidu

Member
Isn't it true scientists working on the Manhattan Project weren't entirely sure what would happen when they detonated an atomic bomb? That sounds pretty scary. I guess if it blew up the space time continuum they wouldn't have much time for regrets.

Yeah they knew, they even tested it multiple times to see the results before they hauled one over to Japan.
 

JoeMartin

Member
Isn't it INCREDIBLY hard to successfully ignite the payload?

If the warhead goes off, it'll spread radioactive contaminant all over the place and that wouldn't be so great, but it's nowhere near the magnitude of damage if the bomb properly detonated and you get Hiroshima-esque results.

...right, physics-GAF?

No. Once you understand the principle behind fission and acquire the necessary materials, it's a fairly simple thing to make a nuclear warhead. You are correct in that the primer requires extremely precise implosion timing on the conventional charges, thus the temperamental nature so referenced - a nuclear warhead being blown up by an external, conventional catalytic explosive will very likely do nothing except scatter radioactive contamination. That said, the technology to properly arm and detonate a warhead isn't exactly hard either, and should one decide to accidentally arm itself it's not as tho that presents some technical hurdle to detonation that 60's technology couldn't do without human interaction.

A delivery device is the hard part. Reliable, accurate rocketry is enormously more complicated than nuclear warheads.
 
Isn't it true scientists working on the Manhattan Project weren't entirely sure what would happen when they detonated an atomic bomb? That sounds pretty scary. I guess if it blew up the space time continuum they wouldn't have much time for regrets.

Edward Teller put forward the idea that it might ignite the earth's atmosphere, but then one of the other bros did the calculations and worked out that it couldn't happen.
 

Ether_Snake

安安安安安安安安安安安安安安安
I find it hard to believe they don't know where it is. They must have surveillance on every square inch of the country.

The point is that regardless of what they did do, they didn't find it.
 

goomba

Banned
And let them "get away with it"? Or you think they'd rather destroy the world (themselves included) than fess up to an accident?
.

Heh I dunno, they could have easily mistakenly blamed the soviet union in the immediate aftermarth of the bomb going off before the details of the accident even got through.
 

thefit

Member
Yeah I think the missing one fell in the ocean and wasnt found. Therr was and NPR programm about this about a yea ago and the last they heard the missing one might still be out there somewhere.
 

DoomGyver

Member
I've heard of this before. It's probably a few hundred feet below the surface of some swampland, leaking into the water supply.
 

Savitar

Member
One day they shall get it back.

When a tractor accidentally bangs into it while moving land.

Okay so they won't get it back so much as a huge ass hole.
 
I find it hard to believe they don't know where it is. They must have surveillance on every square inch of the country.

According to this article, they have a pretty good idea where it is. Also, they say that the second bomb broke into many pieces, and most of it has been accounted for. Except for the part that has uranium, which is lunged somewhere deep into the swampy land:
More alarming information about the crash was revealed later. In 1992, Congress released a summary of the Goldsboro accident indicating that, according to investigators, upon impact the parachute-less bomb had broken into several pieces, one of which was never found. The missing piece contained uranium, and it was believed that it may have struck the ground so hard that it sank deep into the soft, swampy earth. Crews excavated the surrounding farmland to a depth of fifty feet, but were unable to recover the missing piece. Two days after the accident, officials at nearby Seymour Johnson Air Force Base asked that all visitors to the crash site return any aircraft parts they may have removed. The officials claimed that these parts were needed to assess the cause of the accident, though they made no mention of the missing portion of the bomb. The Air Force eventually purchased an easement to the area surrounding the crash site, in order to prevent any land use or digging.

Source
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom