You couldn't come up with something else beyond that? There's a whole smorgasbord of potential roles that often go unused in forum mafias that could give you a cover.
did you have 2 abilities and were allowed to use both of them at the same time during the same night phase?I was Batman in a game and had two abilities. It's not impossible. If Blarg doesn't die his claim falls to pieces. He hasn't argued that he might survive. He will die. So I don't think there's much reason to pursue him.
Vote: Christina Mackenzie
You couldn't come up with something else beyond that? There's a whole smorgasbord of potential roles that often go unused in forum mafias that could give you a cover.
If fat4all is mafia, why would he intentionally try to force a tie? Hindsight tells us that MickD was town, and mafia would rather lynch a townie than not lynch, since they would win faster. Right?
If fat4all did that intentionally (and it's plausible that he didn't! We all make mistakes), the only way it makes sense to me is if Ynnek7 was his mafia partner to force a MickD lynch over a tie.
Is there another explanation?
what if he's an arsonist, and trying to convince us not to kill him today so he can fulfill his objective tonight?
We're so close to the deadline and I don't know how to vote; Blarg & CM's role claims seem consistent and bring the heat off of those 3 and Swamped mechanically, but how do we know they didn't corroborate this out themselves in their Baddie Chat?
Also, Blarg... You mentioned blocking me and swapping Swamped/CM? I can't think of a role like that, but outside of Witch/Doctors, I don't think any roles give you 2 powers, let alone both blocking and redirecting.
VOTE: Blargonaut
Swamped, you mentioned that you scumread Zubz D1+2. How do you feel about him currently, and why? I disagreed with you yesterday, but I'm interested in your thoughts.
let's just do this. this whole day is going in circles.
vote: Christina Mackenzie
vote: Christina Mackenzie
Fine by me.
On the flip side if Blarg is telling the truth about being poisoned the only question for me is 'why Blarg?'. As I have less questions about all this If Blarg is telling the truth about being poisoned than if he is lying I'm thinking it's best to let this go to the end of the day and see what happens with Blarg, rather than us potentially wasting a vote on Blarg.
It's not uncommon for neutrals to be removed from the game as soon as they hit their win conditions.If Blarg isn't telling the truth about being poisoned then something along these lines is the only reason I can see for him to lie. Thing is I'm not to familiar with neutral win conditions, would Night 3 be to early for them to achieve one? If he is still in the game and alive come Day 4 then he is going to come under a lot of scrutiny. Would that be worth the trade off of getting by relatively easily today? If this is all a gambit just to ensure Blarg makes it through the day then with how Day 3 opened I'm not sure it was needed as soon as it was. The day started with CM imediety under fire, and Blarg was only in the running on Day 2 for the author stuff. Dropping that would have probably been enough, which he did. Blarg not telling the truth raises a load of questions for me.
On the flip side if Blarg is telling the truth about being poisoned the only question for me is 'why Blarg?'. As I have less questions about all this If Blarg is telling the truth about being poisoned than if he is lying I'm thinking it's best to let this go to the end of the day and see what happens with Blarg, rather than us potentially wasting a vote on Blarg.
CURRENT VOTE TALLY:
.
.
.
No active vote for Day 3:
Dr. Worm
Fat4all
Hobohodo
infinit777
Mazre
Day 3 ends:
Automated vote tally here
9 votes for majority
*snip*
It's clear that CM will be lynched today. If he flips scum, great! Well played my friend. You will lynch me tomorrow, and that will be a 1-for-1 trade, but will at least give us more mislynches.
If CM is town, hopefully you can reevaluate me based on my own actions throughout the game. We really shouldn't lynch two townies in a row. That would give us less mislynches to work with (especially including poison deaths). So I really really do not want us to chain lynch.
I only ask that you do not lynch batsnacks once I flip town.
*snip*
*snip*
Blarg vs. Swamped/bats - As I've said before, I don't think being poisoned is something someone would lie about, town or scum. In both cases it's beneficial to get that information out there just in case the person who was poisoned started getting considered heavily for a lynch. Like bats, Blarg is playing very forceful but not in a way that's likely to get people to listen to them. It's rather condescending at times.
*snip*
*snip*
Still, their claims are somewhat all over the place, yet kind of believable. Their "targets" talk is intriguing, and Blargs misdirections between possible actions/targets could be very important. But it seems like Blarg just doesn't have enough information about what his switching/changes did concretely.
*snip*
*snip*
Maybe if we had one more day to talk with them,
*snip*
*snip*
which makes me believe the poison claim even more, because I don't think they would of come out with these switching scenarios otherwise. When it comes to Blarg against Swamped or bats, all we really have are suggestions(orders), and not really arguments. This, unsurprisingly, hasn't really lead to votes or even a lot of questioning for reasons outside the possible powers/actions.
*snip*
OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
I don't think so, player
I, for one, won't allow this sordid kind of psychiclogical daretrick to be played during MY lifetime, won't indeed
I'm not gonna let you use CM as a 1-Day disposable innocence shield kow, not I won't
This is what we're gonna do; we're gonna vote either you, batsnacks or Zubz out Today, because I don't like this little network of protection and scapegoats you got going between your little terrific trio, k?
I won't allow it
6 hours to go and no votes what so ever. Everyone of these players is suspicious.
Redirected what? I haven't experienced anything at night, yet.
Nevermind, I'm not sure if a switcher would know that.
We should lynch either batsnacks or Swamped instead of CM Today
I know for a fact they did something to the targets I redirected them to, no matter how much they or my targets try to deny it
Everyone should listen to me
and Swamped
Heya, everyone
*cut*
I actually really liked the Tic Tac Toe game between Timeaisis and Blarg, lol. Reminded me of the Plinko game from PiR.
Did everyone else miss this from Dusk Soldier?
No reasons were given for the votes against infinit777 and Zubz.
infinit777 vote
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=225438563#post225438563
Zubz vote
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=225578225#post225578225
Scared to be on a townie bandwagon? The Mazre vote was going nowhere.
So upshot: unsure about Infinit.
scum tend to get paranoid when there's pressure on their partners.
I placed a vote on infinite777 to see if any one would stick up for him.
that's what i meant by his role. his role was bait.
zubz was the one player to question my infinite vote on D2. I moved my vote to him when he started getting pressured since if he flipped scum I felt there was a good chance infinite would too.
The bold leads me to believe that you have more info based on your PR. I know for a fact that i didn't do anything last night. Why did you recently add Zubz to the mix, because he voted you and then changed to CM?
Wait, so you think Swamped's Mafia? Because I've been targeting her just as heavily as you and CM. You're all safe kills, but something something Fist of the North Star something (Which I totally forgot about, sorry).
Holy crap, i didn't expect squidyj to die... Well shit, I wounder if they were right about blarg after all...
*snip*
*snip*
-------------------------------------------
Though its weird that he is all of a sudden talking normally now, was Squidj a ghost writer and he was the author that released squidyj's work?
*snip*
*snip*
-------------------------------------------
(as of post #836)
As i am reading what blarg is saying in relation to his being poisoned and giving CM powers, I honestly BELIEVE him.
------------------------------------------
(as of #842)
This is a very wild day so far from what i am reading. we have CM Role claiming, Blarg getting poisoned and talking normal, Blarg claiming to have given swamped's power to CM and CM claiming they didn't receive anything.
*snip*
*snip*
I enjoyed it as well, it was very entertaining.
I have to say, now i feel like blarg is trying to put heat onto cm saying he gave them an item and they are lying.
I am very confused
*snip*
*snip*
Alternatively, I feel like Blarg is town. i really really do... but ... now hear me out, if he is messing with us and the poison is not real, we lose 2 more town. getting scum closer to the majority. all they have to do is convince 3 people to pick someone else. Blarg could try to slither by and say that it was to lure the scum out . ultimately confusing us more... at which point they will be close to majority.
*snip*
about what
Thanks for the correction, makes more sense to me now.CORRECTION: I didn't give CM Swamped's power, I made Swamped's power affect CM instead of whoever she was originally targeting that Night
ask him
ask her
Been a busy day in work, had hoped to post earlier in the day but time got away from me.
I've been thinking about how I see Zubz and CM some more and it's starting to shift around for me, I'm seeing Zubz as the more scummy of the two. The end of Day 2 saw Zubz stating how he wanted to change his vote off of CM and not vote for Mick but wouldn't do it as it would result in a tie that would put him in danger. But it was pointed out this wasn't the case, and as more votes came in he had the chance to change his vote onto CM and not cause a tie but he still left it untouched. In the closing moments of Day 2 he posted a number of times about how he didn't want to vote for Mick D so was in the thread and following along. If it bothered him that much why not change? Couple this with 'not noticing' how pointless a vote on Blarg is right now and his reduced activity for the day is leaving me feeling uneasy.
Vote: Zubz
I'm confused by these two statements. Trigger, explain what you understood by Blarg's claim?
the players I'm most suspicious of are all voting to keep C. Mac
it's making me second guess my vote now
but the scum team can't be this obvious can it?
I'm more of a breadcrumber lol.If I am night killed remember to lynch Swamped when CM flips mafia.
Remember to look at the day 2 votes:
Look at Satanic Saint and ynnek after Swamped, both late mickd voters and both of them voted off the main wagons day 1.
If blarg is telling the truth about being poisoned my yolo pick for a neutral poisoner would be Dusk Soldier.
- He has taken a back seat this game, voted off the main wagons day 1 and 2, isn't making enemies.
- He appeared to want to move this phase along quickly.
- Dusk Solder also voted blarg prior to the poison claim. His vote was unexplained and seemingly useless, or was it? Dusk Soldier could have poisoned blarg and voted him early on so that no one would suspect he is the poisoner.
I'm more of a breadcrumber lol.
I probably would have poisoned Blarg though.