koji kabuto
Member
Attorney: Betty Shelby had temporary loss of hearing during Terence Crutcher shooting
Uh huh...sounds about right.
Attorney: Betty Shelby had temporary loss of hearing during Terence Crutcher shooting
Uh huh...sounds about right.
You think that matters? He's black and had drugs in his system.Isn't this shooting the one where he had his hands up and walked back to his car and then got shot? If it is, the pcp wasn't doing what it normally does, which is make the person go nuts.
Shouldn't matter if he had drugs in his system. He was unarmed and non threatening. Yet this will someone be used as a reason he should've been murdered, and the officer given their job back like nothing happened.
An autopsy report released Tuesday by the Oklahoma Office of the Chief Medical Examiner said that Mr. Crutcher’s body had 96 nanograms of PCP per milliliter of blood. That is a high level, according to drug studies, which have found that hallucinations can occur at much lower concentrations, but the studies also show that the correlation between blood levels of the drug and intoxication is loose at best.
Yeah pretty much.Shouldn't matter if he had drugs in his system. He was unarmed and non threatening. Yet this will someone be used as a reason he should've been murdered, and the officer given their job back like nothing happened.
The videos show Shelby shoot Crutcher in his side as he is standing next to his vehicle.
Shelby said she remembers the exact moment.
Its like slow motion, she said. Me bringing my gun up, my finger coming in, and then letting off. And he stopped and then he just slowly fell to the ground.
She explains to reporter Bill Whitaker that she shot Crutcher because she thought he lowered his hand to possibly reach through his vehicles window a claim that is not clearly shown in available footage.
His shoulders drop, his arm drops, and hes reaching in and its fast, Shelby said. Just that would tell any officer that that mans going for a weapon.
No weapon was found in the vehicle or on Crutcher, however.
While viewing the video, Shelby told Whitaker that as Crutcher walked away from her toward his SUV she was thinking to herself, Dont do this. Please dont do this. Dont make this happen.
Shelby says the video shows Crutcher looking back at her as he stood near his SUV, something police refer to as targeting.
So hes getting my position, my last known location, to retrieve and then shoot, she said.
Shelby said she used a louder, more intense voice to try to get Crutcher to obey her.
 Stop. Stop! Stop! and he didnt, Shelby said. And thats when I took aim.
Crutcher was responsible for his own death, Shelby said.
If he would have complied, if he would have communicated with me, if he would have just done as I asked him to do, we would not be here, she said.
Shelby feels she has been misunderstood and treated as an enemy.
My situation was no different than ... a lynch mob coming after me, Shelby said.
I never wanted to kill anyone, she said. I saw a threat and I used the force I felt necessary to stop a threat.
She meant to say this case was like a chain around her neck, and social media has been whipping her over it since.Maybe you wanna use a different term than "lynch mob".
Yes, and she's going to get off on it too. "Scary Black Man Didn't Obey" has done well for getting officers acquitted for decades.They should just put "Comply or Die" on the side of their cruisers. Seriously, that's your defense?
Shelby says the video shows Crutcher looking back at her as he stood near his SUV, something police refer to as targeting.
So hes getting my position, my last known location, to retrieve and then shoot, she said.
So just looking at an officer while black is all it takes now? It wasn't bad enough that eye contact was considered an immediate threat of violence, now you can't look at a cop at all or they'll shoot you?
What is wrong with people? Jesus Christ
So she literally shot him because he looked at her funny.
Like, that's her actual defense.
So she literally shot him because he looked at her funny.
Like, that's her actual defense.
Well the actual defense is that in a country in which any person can have a gun in their car or waistband, you're always two seconds away from being shot at. So they seem to have all of this training based on body language and hand position that seems to make it so that disobeying one verbal order to a suspect to move their hands automatically justifies shooting.
So when it comes time to justify it to their superiors or a grand jury, I think they're accurate that what they did was consistent with their training. But the training almost seems to err on the side of shooting.
How come when I try to view the vid in the OP the twitter never loads?
Another supposedly similar trained officer arrives on the scene and chooses a non-lethal option. If all officers are similarly trained and equipped, why was that not her first option?
More likely the other officer gets fired for not killing him.
Update: Found not guilty of manslaughter
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/17/us/tulsa-police-shooting-trial/index.html?adkey=bn
Update: Found not guilty of manslaughter
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/17/us/tulsa-police-shooting-trial/index.html?adkey=bn
Update: Found not guilty of manslaughter
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/17/us/tulsa-police-shooting-trial/index.html?adkey=bn
Update: Found not guilty of manslaughter
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/17/us/tulsa-police-shooting-trial/index.html?adkey=bn
For fuck's sake, when will things start to change.
What are we left to do if non violent protests and the justice system fail us?
Update: Found not guilty of manslaughter
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/17/us/tulsa-police-shooting-trial/index.html?adkey=bn
UPDATE: Jury finds Betty Shelby not guilty of manslaughter
But she feared for her life guys.
Edit: beaten by the popo.
Incredible.Update: Found not guilty of manslaughter
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/17/us/tulsa-police-shooting-trial/index.html?adkey=bn