• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Videogame Influencers Can Not Ask The Hard Questions Because They Want Your Money

bender

What time is it?
lQ-Qa1R6rOAaKUpnSEGGbzVcXBqbQQPFx1I3Btw2_p0.jpg
 

GHound

Member
More that they don't want to get blacklisted by publishers or platform holders that are being dipshits. Next!
 

CamHostage

Member
This is not only for videogames, every tech products is now presented in a very positive way to push the viewers to buy them using the affiliate links

For pc parts:


Who are you following?

Such a blanket statement is unrealistic. The internet and Youtube are FULL of negative voices who are doing just fine attracting business. And positive-pushing outlets who are unashamed of their positive relations with advertisers (like Disney fans or VR enthusiasts or whatever has fan-based influencers) are generally up-front and purposeful about it.

You just now used a negative influencer (commenting on other influencers, BTW, which is always curious to see fire fighting fire,) to make the case that negative influencers do not exist.

GCP3jFI.jpeg


You should be aware of the revenue stream of your preferred content providers. (And YT influencers have relatively few choices of who to seek revenue from, but they also are often very purposeful in what content they're putting in front of their niche audience and generally believe to some degree in what they're saying... sometimes a soap really is the best soap, and sometimes you can get pretty good food through the mail.) Worrying that everybody is out to lie to you and fuck you over with filtered reality, though... I mean, you are ultimately your own filter.
 
Last edited:

Fbh

Member
They can't ask the hard questions because the only thing 99% of them have to offer is access.
The only thing that makes them relevant is that they get sent review copies, they get invited to events, they are allowed to interview the people making games, etc.
They can't risk asking hard questions because then they'll loose the only thing that makes them relevant.

And people are to blame too because the average gamer would rather blindly give their money to some big publisher and play the latest hyped game on day 1 instead of waiting 2-3 weeks to get an unbiased review
 

March Climber

Gold Member
This is not only for videogames, every tech products is now presented in a very positive way to push the viewers to buy them using the affiliate links

For pc parts:

Another 2 realities situation happening here:

One reality: Posting a video criticizng MKBHD as proof of what you say.

Second reality: MKBHD has been a bit controversial lately in the tech world due to his recent scathing reviews of new tech, to the point where people had to sit down and seriously consider if he could kill an entirely new tech company with one bad review.
 
Last edited:
It's very true, they won't say what they truly think, for fear of no likes and no subs.
Thats why none will call out the SCUM that is Nintendo
 

Calverz

Member
This is not only for videogames, every tech products is now presented in a very positive way to push the viewers to buy them using the affiliate links

For pc parts:

Have you not been following the mkbhd controversy? This is not true. People blaming marques brown reviews being negative and killing new tech.
 

SJRB

Gold Member
100% agreed!

This post is sponsored by Raid: Shadow Legends. Test your might against other players in Classic Arena, Tag Team Arena, and Live Arena battles! Climb the rankings, earn unique Gear, and dominate your opponents with your tactical brilliance. Learn from every fight to tune your team, and turn it into a force of nature. Use code "SJRBeautiful" for massive discounts!
 

Mr Reasonable

Completely Unreasonable
All that's needed is for reviewers to consider their readers/viewers their employer instead of the companies who make the products they review.

Unfortunately, audiences don't value reviews enough to pay for them. I don't see how any of this changes, tbh.

So, I don't think the premise in the title is quite right. Really, if a reviewer wanted (and could get) an audiences money then they'd do more to serve that audience. But that's not the economy of reviews now.
 
Last edited:

StueyDuck

Member
What op wants is a gaf slack channel.

And to become a journalist organisation of our own, operating entirely through slack
 
Top Bottom