The "fakes" referred to only the herbal supplements listed though, not actual synthesized vitamins. Herbals are by and large useless bullshit.
Anyone have a recommendation for good placebos? I want to make sure it really does nothing.
That statement is bullshit and only continues to perpetuate the thought that things are only cured by synthetically created drugs.
That statement is bullshit and only continues to perpetuate the thought that things are only cured by synthetically created drugs.
I don't know if you're serious or not, but it got me thinking - I wonder if anything is actually -cured- by non-synthetic drugs. I know very few things are cured by them, but I can't think of anything that is cured via 'natural remedies'.
I mean, there are things like pain relief from chewing willow bark, for example - but is there anything that acts like an antibiotic, for example (one of the only synthetic drugs that actually cures stuff as far as I know).
I really don't understand why people think like this. Do they think the thousands of years people brewed willow bark tea was for nothing? Or all the herbs used (and still used) for calming or analgesic effects were just fake? Or do they pretend opium never existed?
As I said earlier not all of them. St Johns Wort works for one.
That's why you eat real food.
The herbs do actually do stuff. Willow bark = aspirin etc.
Except it was the NY State attorney's office that found this and not the FDA... off of a NYT article no less.
Big Mac is expensive but have you looked at the dollar menu? If you're determined you could feed a family of 5 off the dollar menu for less than the cost of a big mac.
Edit: Also many would argue eating a sirloin isn't healthy eating at all.
Right- there is already a proven, synthesized, superior solution on the market.
Umm, penicillin? Before modern semisynthetic antibiotics, antibiotics were all found in nature. Even the modern ones are mostly just modifications of those found existing naturally.I don't know if you're serious or not, but it got me thinking - I wonder if anything is actually -cured- by non-synthetic drugs. I know very few things are cured by them, but I can't think of anything that is cured via 'natural remedies'.
I mean, there are things like pain relief from chewing willow bark, for example - but is there anything that acts like an antibiotic, for example (one of the only synthetic drugs that actually cures stuff as far as I know).
Unregulated supplement market continues to fucking suck.
Goddamn Mel Gibson
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_F_ZZvdHqPM
Well the diet is mostly up to you, and yes I agree that it varies across different cultures and classes, and people have been used to that, but who can honestly prove that all these pills are actually beneficial.
Umm, penicillin? Before modern semisynthetic antibiotics, antibiotics were all found in nature.
A large number of drugs (maybe a majority) are non-synthetic, semi synthetic or are a synthesized version of the exact same molecule that exists in nature. Look up something like taxol for example. You are falling into the same trap as the alternative medicine people in thinking that 'drug', 'chemical' etc mean non-natural. All the xxxx-imab drugs for example are antibodies which are 99 - 100% 'natural'.I don't know if you're serious or not, but it got me thinking - I wonder if anything is actually -cured- by non-synthetic drugs. I know very few things are cured by them, but I can't think of anything that is cured via 'natural remedies'.
I mean, there are things like pain relief from chewing willow bark, for example - but is there anything that acts like an antibiotic, for example (one of the only synthetic drugs that actually cures stuff as far as I know).
Came back to say this, but you already beat me.
You generally aren't going to have a lot of studies showing the efficacy of things found in nature because their isn't a way to patent these things or control the market easily. Synthetics are patentable. Companies provide funding and influence research because there is money to be made. For fucks sake they are making synthetic THC in Japan even though natural THC and marijuana is legal. The synthetic THC is protected by patent laws.
Or give the FDA more money. There are countless "supplments" out there that never get tested and are sold by the millions. The least we can do is set up some sort of approval process for "supplements." Now you could put poop ashes in a pill and call it "Vitamin P" and it would sell.The FDA is so worthless I think we need actually need to start over. Give enforcement to a different agency.
This is completely wrong. Of course you can patent natural things.Came back to say this, but you already beat me.
You generally aren't going to have a lot of studies showing the efficacy of things found in nature because their isn't a way to patent these things or control the market easily. Synthetics are patentable. Companies provide funding and influence research because there is money to be made. For fucks sake they are making synthetic THC in Japan even though natural THC and marijuana is legal. The synthetic THC is protected by patent laws.
Umm, penicillin? Before modern semisynthetic antibiotics, antibiotics were all found in nature. Even the modern ones are mostly just modifications of those found existing naturally.
A large number of drugs (maybe a majority) are non-synthetic, semi synthetic or are a synthesized version of the exact same molecule that exists in nature. Look up something like taxol for example. You are falling into the same trap as the alternative medicine people in thinking that 'drug', 'chemical' etc mean non-natural. All the xxxx-imab drugs for example are antibodies which are 99 - 100% 'natural'.
To be clear, I don't think you're going to find an herbal supplement that actually acts to kill bacteria or viral infections. You won't find an herbal supplement that cures cancer.
But there are plenty of things you can do with herbal medication. St Johns wort works as an antidepressant. Plenty of calming herbs like passion flower and chamomile work for anxiety. Chamomile and others are also great to help you feel sleepy, or you could just take a melatonin supplement; this works for insomnia.
There are also herbal supplements that work well as blood thinners, analgesic herbs for pain management, and more.
It's not a placebo. It might not be as good as proscription medicine, but in many cases its cheaper and easier to access (you can even order them online). In some cases though herbal supplements have the same intended effect as proscription medicine but with fewer side effects.
Conspiratorial nonsense. Medical universities live and die on their research. This is literally the reason we have penicillin and aspirin and countless other medicine.
You are espousing medicine that was discovered before the 1900's. The landscape of pharmaceutical companies and Universities have changed greatly in just the last 40 years. You are being foolish. You literally use aspirin to try and prove a point even though it came from the Willow Tree, when previously you said herbs were bullshit even though they are both plants with medicinal properties.
You are espousing medicine that was discovered before the 1900's. The landscape of pharmaceutical companies and Universities have changed greatly in just the last 40 years. You are being foolish.
The "fakes" referred to only the herbal supplements listed though, not actual synthesized vitamins. Herbals are by and large useless bullshit.
Knowing my posts, it's probably not shocking that I agree with him - but let me tell you why.
Generally, synthesizing medicines provide you with the exact components you need for your medicine - as opposed to the whole kit and kaboodle that you get from taking the herb whole, or even refining it with a mortar or a kettle or whatever. Further, when you understand the molecular compound and why it does what it does, you can take that further with the scientific method and make better versions - significantly harder to do that by just breeding new plants. Finally, it's easier to mass produce something synthetic.
Patenting these things also makes sense considering the hundreds of millions/billions of research that go into each drug. You don't want to spend that time and money and not at least have a headstart on it's usage.
This is completely wrong. Of course you can patent natural things.
The latter paragraph is exactly what I was talking about. I took issue with him saying herbals are bullshit even though they have medicinal properties.
It is very hard to patent a natural occurring chemical that will stand up in court.
Herbals *are* bullshit. Instead of chewing on bark, try aspirin. It's only 99 cents at the corner store.
A lot of drugs come from plants and nature.
BUT, these compounds are generally extremely complex and so are (1) hard to make and (2) open to having lots of side effects and interactions.
St Johns Wort is popular but it interacts with a shitload of other medications and can cause serious problems. It's also dodgy in its effectiveness.
It's best to stick with the real drugs. Many are based on the herbal stuff but have been modified so the crap is minimised.
I have a problem with someone equating something natural as bullshit just because the active ingredient hasn't been extracted. We have aspirin now because people realized the bark had a medicinal property. Rhodiola Rosea still hasn't had an active ingredient extracted or synthezised, yet it has fatigue relieving and cognitive activity increasing effects. You would probably tell me it is bullshit though apparently.
I have a problem with someone equating something natural as bullshit just because the active ingredient hasn't been extracted. We have aspirin now because people realized the bark had a medicinal property. Rhodiola Rosea still hasn't had an active ingredient extracted or synthezised, yet it has fatigue relieving and cognitive activity increasing effects. You would probably tell me it is bullshit though apparently.
Research regarding R. rosea efficacy is contradictory. While some evidence suggests that the herb may be helpful for enhancing physical performance and alleviating mental fatigue, methodological flaws limit accurate assessment of efficacy. A rigorously-designed well reported RCT that minimizes bias is needed to determine true efficacy of R. rosea for fatigue..[15]
St Johns Wort is popular but it interacts with a shitload of other medications and can cause serious problems. It's also dodgy in its effectiveness.
It's best to stick with the real drugs. Many are based on the herbal stuff but have been modified so the crap is minimised.
Well...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhodiola_rosea#Phytochemicals_and_health_effects
Scientists agree that willow bark gives you pain relief, I don't think they're on board with Rhodiola though.
It only interacts because it affects serotonin levels. Any "real drug" SSRI will do that.
Because no one is doing research on it doesn't mean it doesn't work. The limited number of studies calls it into question.
Eh? No one said 'real drugs' don't have interactions.It only interacts because it affects serotonin levels. Any "real drug" SSRI will do that.
Still blows my mind that such a commercial existed. How stupid are we?
Because no one is doing research on it doesn't mean it doesn't work. The limited number of studies calls it into question. There haven't been any studies I've seen that refute its improvement on the experiment group. More research needs to be done. I'd be very interested in research done on the Maca root. I'd honestly like to know if it does anything or just has essential minerals in it. Apparently it helps men with libido problems and women with hot flashes, but I've only seen like two studies done on the stuff.
I'm not sure what your point is exactly.
This is fallacious reasoning- the absence of evidence is not evidence. If a proven treatment already exists there's little reason to chance it on an unknown quantity.
Herbs are proven to have active ingredients that are medicinal. You say Herbs are bullshit. Your fallacious reasoning is outstanding.
Herbs are proven to have active ingredients that are medicinal. You say Herbs are bullshit. Your fallacious reasoning is outstanding.
I think he's clarified, and it's something I would agree on as well. Any particular herb that has a proven (and I mean proven) medical effect has most likely already been turned into a more effective medication. Why would you use the less effective version? That would be 'bullshit', as Zophar described it.
.There are also a lot of people (especially in the US) who can't afford to go to the doctor to get proscriptions, and can't afford the cost of proscription medicine. There are a surprisingly huge number of people who rely on OTC drugs, herbal supplements, and fish antibiotics in order to get by.
I think he's clarified, and it's something I would agree on as well. Any particular herb that has a proven (and I mean proven) medical effect has most likely already been turned into a more effective medication. Why would you use the less effective version? That would be 'bullshit', as Zophar described it.