Brock Reiher
Banned
Plus with less insects they'll have to move to eating humansSpiders are arachnids.
Plus with less insects they'll have to move to eating humansSpiders are arachnids.
May help that we are generally cleaner nowWhen I went to school in Australia, in the city, flies in summer were everywhere, kids got pretty good at catching them, for torture of course.
But now, at least in Sydney, a day featuring the great Australian wave is pretty rare.
Sorry guys, I'll try to kill less this week.
Seriously though, I find this hard to believe as many insects are becoming resistant to pesticides.
To the point where I now choose to implement an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) to help keep the pests at bay.
Added bonus, IPM only targets the pests and lets the beneficial insects thrive.
Sustainable food production will become a huge problem over the coming decades. A National Geographic article I read recently made note that in the next 30 years as we grow to 10 billion, we'll need to grow as much food as we have grown in the last 10000 years (since the dawn of agriculture).
Sobering stuff. I hope we get it right.
Indeed a local plot near me is being ransacked with a sign advertising more retail space. We already have plenty of similar strip malls half full atm and a mall next door with plenty of open area.This attitude if you see some land lets build has to change. Wildlife needs lots of land, it might look barren to you but it isn't. We have to stop with this chasing GDP and this mind set of perpetual growth. We're on the cusp of breaking the ecology from the plankton in the ocean to the insects who eat the dead animals.
Near me they've just obliterated acres of wild land to fit 60 homes in an already populated area with road bottlenecks. Tons of insects and rabbits have no home so we can boost the local GDP, all kinds of wild flowers, nettles with berries gone. Also these homes will be squeezed on with little to no gardens, everything squeaky clean.
We have been manufacturing and pollinating for years, if not decades already. Even "organic" farmers don't even rely on insects. Are you saying every fruit and plant that's sprouted in the last 10 years have been the work of bees, mosquitoes, and Flys? No, they became irrelevant.
I'm pretty sure none of us are making it to 2200
It probably depends on where you are.So your telling me there use to be even MORE insects around????!???
But they feed on insects, so they gonna die too!Spiders are arachnids.
Honestly? Good. I accept it. Fuck insects.
We used to step outside at night here in Georgia and see lightning bugs everywhere. We would catch them with our hands and put them in jars. You go outside now and you barely see any at all.
I don't find this story humorous in any way guys. If this is true it indicates that we could be looking at an end to all life on this planet in the very near future.
BTW major outlets reporting this. From BBC front page:
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-41670472
Look at some of the responses to this thread. Most people just don't care until they're directly affected by it.
Im about to have a panic attack reading this.
I am terrified of what the future holds.
Really disappointed in this thread. The potential destruction of the Earth's most essential creatures and half or more of the posts are cheap jokes.
Really disappointed in this thread. The potential destruction of the Earth's most essential creatures and half or more of the posts are cheap jokes.
They're kind of the start of the foodchain though. Also pollinators.
Would you prefer it was nothing but a string of people going "Wow, that's bad"?
i don't give a FUCK i'm dead in like 60 years anyways
If we (humanity) do nothing about this, shit is going to get real within 10 to 20 years. This 75% drop was within 25 years.
But sure, 'fuck you, got mine', etc. I have almost no hope for the future of humanity but I'm willing to fight for it.
Malthus was delayed by the green revolution, not defeated.
And what are you doing to fight?
Fortunately, corn, rice, and wheat do not need pollinators
Currently - volunteering for political candidates that support the environment, donating to the Sierra Club, planting flowers, putting bugs outside that get trapped inside, etc. It's little stuff but at least it's something. Something large scale needs to change to truly make a difference though.
Anyone have a list of good causes to donate to or volunteer with?
Just read the BBC article and it says a similar sampling in the UK (albeit only as far as 2002) shows a much smaller reduction.
Where are we getting this global estimate of a 75% reduction from?
Edit: It seems like this is a case of exaggerated reporting, is it not?
I'm 40, and remember there being many many more birds and insects 25 years ago.
Insects are doing just fine down here in Florida
I agree with you on the importance of further research in this. This is a big deal and needs more research to get a better picture of what is happening out there.2002 is 15 years ago, so it doesn't really answer the question. If the loss in mass has been exponential, then UK could be in the same place today. This should and probably will be tested all over the world due to these findings. Although Germany is not the world, I don't see why they would be especially worse so their sample is very valid and indicates further research should be done. Not only the what but the why.
Global human civilization isn't making it out of the next 50 years, let alone 2200. There will still be small groups of humans slowly dying in an unstable collapsing ecosystem by 2200 though.
Seriously? Taste seems fairly easy to fix, just separate it from the main source itself, and let people flavor them as desired.
If people already replaced two meals by something efficiently produced and nutritious, it would already be a significant boon.
True but there's a big difference between the original article extrapolating the German results to the entire world, and the newspaper making that extrapolation. The former I would tend to find more reliable but it seems like it's the latter.2002 is 15 years ago, so it doesn't really answer the question. If the loss in mass has been exponential, then UK could be in the same place today. This should and probably will be tested all over the world due to these findings. Although Germany is not the world, I don't see why they would be especially worse so their sample is very valid and indicates further research should be done. Not only the what but the why.